Insurgent Wilson shares new pictures of her little woman on Mom’s Day

Aca-adorable!

On her first Mother’s Day as a mother Rebel Wilson has shared the most prominent photos yet of her first child, her daughter Royce Lillian Elizabeth Wilson.

In her May 14 Instagram post, the Pitch Perfect actress shared a picture of herself and her fiancée Ramon Agrum– who wears a pink baseball cap that says “Mama” and sits with the 6-month-old baby. Royce wears a cream wool bunny hat, a pastel pink cardigan, gray sweatpants, and white and pink fluffy socks.

Another picture shows Rebel holding up the little girl as she stands with her on the deck of a large boat. Royce wears a pink and white polka dot ruffled dress and is barefoot. A third image shows the baby wearing a blue and white sun hat and lying on a towel with his mother on a desk overlooking the ocean.

In her caption, the Bridesmaids actress shared an anecdote about parenting that was just perfect.

“Happy Mothers’s Day! (I just woke up at 5:30 am and I’ve changed a lot [poo]” she wrote. “How about you?”

Chinatowns confront fast luxurious growth

Just a few hundred people of Chinese heritage still live in Washington, D.C.’s Chinatown. Many have been pushed out to cheaper and safer areas.

Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

Penny and Jack Lee, now married, grew up in the 1960s and 1970s among the thousands of people of Chinese heritage who lived in apartments lining the main stretches of Washington, D.C.’s bustling Chinatown.

“Chinatown was very bright, vibrant,” Jack Lee recalled. “All of our recreations ended up being in the alleys of Chinatown.” They felt it was a safe haven, he said.

related investing news

CNBC Pro

But the neighborhood didn’t stay the same for long. First came a convention center in 1982 that displaced many in the majority Chinese community. Then, in 1997, came the MCI Center, now Capital One Arena, a few blocks from the heart of the neighborhood. These developments, as well as luxury condos, caused rents to rise and forced grocery stores and restaurants to close. They also pushed residents to move to safer and cheaper areas, Penny Lee said.

Just a few hundred people of Chinese heritage still live in the neighborhood, mostly in Section 8 apartments for lower-income residents. There are now fewer than a dozen Chinese restaurants, as well as the long-standing Chinatown gate and non-Chinese businesses with signs bearing Chinese characters. Jokingly called the “Chinatown Block,” reflecting its diminished size, what’s left of the neighborhood is mere blocks from a wealthier area that contains the U.S. Capitol and the National Mall.

Chinatowns across the nation face a similar reckoning. In major Chinatown neighborhoods, luxury development and public-use projects have altered the fabric of these historic communities, according to more than two dozen activists, residents and restaurant owners. While some argue these developments accelerate local economies, many interviewed by CNBC say they destroy the neighborhoods’ character and push out longtime residents.

Some Chinatown residents benefited from the development boom, selling properties to developers or drawing more customers from increased foot traffic. Many others, meanwhile, have been driven out by higher rents, limited parking and increasingly unsafe conditions.

The changes in Chinatowns across the country look similar, though they’re unfolding at different timelines and magnitudes. Chicago’s Chinatown, in comparison with other Chinatowns with shrinking populations, more than doubled its Chinese population between 1990 and 2020.

“Those who are interested in preserving D.C. Chinatown should look toward its intrinsic value to tell the Chinese American story, the American story,” said Evelyn Moy, president of the Moy Family Association, which provides education and assistance to residents in Washington, D.C.

Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

Cities already deeply affected by gentrification and high-end development stand as templates for how the shift may unfold elsewhere. For many, housing is the problem — and the solution.

“We can’t build our way out of the housing crisis, but we can’t get out of the housing crisis without building,” said Ener Chiu, executive vice president of community building at East Bay Asian Local Development Corporation in California, which has built 2,300 permanently affordable homes in Oakland.

A case study in the heart of Manhattan

In Manhattan’s Chinatown, which dates back to the late 1800s, residents and local organizations said there are two interrelated fights: one against luxury development, and another to build more affordable housing and maintain existing apartments. Some have been frustrated that money and government support have gone toward skyscrapers and not the longtime residents who still struggle to secure housing in the neighborhood.

Opponents say tall, modern buildings — such as One Manhattan Square, a 72-story residential skyscraper in nearby Two Bridges developed by Extell Development Group, which features units priced at over $1.2 million — will affect surrounding property values, the structure of neighboring buildings and the percentage of Asian residents in Chinatown.

Opponents say tall, modern buildings such as One Manhattan Square affect surrounding property values, the structure of neighboring buildings and the percentage of Asian residents in Chinatown.

Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

There are also plans to develop four more towers ranging from 62 to 77 stories, each with 25% affordable housing, by Extell, JDS Development Group, and Chetrit Group.

City councilmember Christopher Marte and residents of the Lower East Side and Chinatown filed a lawsuit against the buildings’ developers and the city in October, arguing construction of the towers will create further environmental and health issues. The suit contends the developments violate the Green Amendment granting New York state residents the right to clean air.

Extell and JDS Development Group did not provide comment for this story.

Some residents have shown tentative support for the luxury buildings, saying they might make the neighborhood safer or bring in wealthier Asian residents who could boost Chinatown’s economy. Most who spoke with CNBC, however, expressed frustration over the rapid development of these megaprojects.

The Two Bridges fight is an experiment in looking out for residents’ livelihoods while “fighting against a very anti-humanity way of seeing a city,” said Alina Shen, the lead Chinatown Tenants Union organizer at grassroots community organization CAAAV: Organizing Asian Communities. “It’s a response to the fact that people who remain in Chinatown feel a deep pessimism for what’s happening and from literally being in the shadow of a ledge of a mega tower.”

The struggle with luxury developers has also involved the fight for secure housing.

Manhattan Chinatown’s housing stock is “really aged,” which has led to costly fires, according to Thomas Yu, executive director of Asian Americans for Equality.

Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

Chinatown’s housing stock is “really aged,” but sparse vacant land has made creating affordable housing difficult, said Thomas Yu, executive director of Asian Americans for Equality, which has created more than 800 affordable housing units citywide. The development process for new units can take years, he said, and developers have rapidly sought out Manhattan’s Chinatown as the borough’s “last place with huge potential returns.”

Evictions, buyouts and deregulation of rent-stabilized housing have contributed to Chinatown’s population decline and illegal sublet situations, according to Yu.

Chen Yun, a tenant leader for CAAAV, said she had a landlord who for years refused to repair heating and hot water. She said she and her husband would boil pots of water at work and bring them home to bathe. They also dealt with a collapsed ceiling, she said. Yun spoke in Mandarin, translated by Shen and CAAAV communications manager Irene Hsu.

In 2005, Yun helped grow the Chinatown Tenants Union to help residents fight landlords and report faulty conditions. However, residents continue reporting similar housing issues, which Yun said has pushed some onto the streets, and more residents have mobilized to oppose developments they say could exacerbate these issues.

“No matter how beautiful or well-built these buildings are, [residents] simply can’t afford it, it’s not within their means, and these luxury buildings have nothing to do with us,” said Yun, who lost her job during the pandemic and spends much of her retirement money on rent.

Yu, of Asian Americans for Equality, said his organization is not against development but that more affordable housing should go up instead of solely market-rate buildings. Asian Americans have among the highest citywide poverty levels and have poor odds of finding secure housing, Yu said.

Some argue luxury development is eliminating affordable housing opportunities by sheer proximity, as one of Chinatown’s ZIP codes was excluded from a city loan program for low-income areas since it also included the wealthy Soho and Tribeca neighborhoods.

In Manhattan’s Chinatown, residents and local organizations said there are two interrelated fights: one against luxury development, and another to build more affordable housing and maintain existing apartments.

Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

Some residents expressed feeling an intense divide between their local government and Chinatown — fueled in part by rezoning debates, not to mention a proposed $8.3 billion 40-story jail in the neighborhood.

Zishun Ning of the Chinatown Working Group has led protests against the proposed jail, as well as against the Museum of Chinese in America, which stands to benefit from the jail’s expansion via a $35 million government investment. Ning said the city government’s “big development” agenda has “pitted us against each other.”

The museum’s leaders said they’ve been scapegoated, as they weren’t included in development talks with the city but could not turn down the money.

Moving out

For many Chinatown residents, rising rents and sparse affordable housing have left them with one choice: moving away. But challenges often follow residents, and once they resettle, some face familiar changes.

Maggie Chen, a receptionist in Boston who has lived in an affordable housing development for eight years, said rising rents have made her reconsider whether living in Chinatown is economical.

Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

Many Chinese residents have relocated from Boston’s Chinatown to the nearby suburbs of Malden and Quincy, said Angie Liou, executive director of Boston’s Asian Community Development Corporation. Luxury buildings have opened in these suburban satellite Chinatowns as developers look to capitalize on less developed parts of the city, pushing residents further away.

In Manhattan, a woman with the surname Yang, who requested partial anonymity to preserve her privacy, said she had lived in a $1,100-per-month Chinatown apartment, which her family could no longer afford due to increasing rent. After applying for public housing through the NYC Housing Authority, she moved eight miles away in 2009 into a $400-per-month apartment in East Harlem.

“It was a hard readjustment period just because my life is even to this day still tied to Chinatown, so the train commute is an extra hour,” Yang said. She spoke in Fujianese, with translation by Ling Ren, Asian Americans For Equality’s manager of residential services.

Some Chinatown residents have looked to the suburbs for cheaper rent, lower maintenance costs and better parking, said Patty Moy, manager of China Pearl Restaurant, which has locations in Boston and Quincy, Massachusetts.

Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

Yang said she still goes downtown each week for doctor’s appointments and groceries. She found several other people of Chinese heritage living in her new neighborhood with whom she waits in food pantry lines, some of whom have also relocated from downtown Manhattan, she said.

Other displaced members of New York’s Chinese community have relocated to Flushing, Queens, a hotbed for condominium and affordable housing developments.

Though communities such as Flushing have long appealed to residents across many socioeconomic backgrounds, it’s recently attracted wealthier residents moving into new developments.

“One of the unique aspects of Flushing is what I call the 15-minute neighborhood, the idea that you can live, work, play, go to school, partake in open space, shop, sort of all within 15 minutes,” said Ross Moskowitz, partner at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, who represents several developers’ projects in the neighborhood.

And as more people move in, rents go up, meaning many residents who relocated to Flushing for cheaper rent have found themselves in the same battles with developers that they fled from, according to Jo-Ann Yoo, executive director of Asian American Federation.

Chinatowns and the pandemic

Many debates surrounding luxury development and affordable housing were accelerated by the pandemic, which shuttered hundreds of businesses across Chinatowns. After experiencing xenophobia and discrimination fueled by anti-Chinese sentiment during the pandemic, many people stopped coming to Chinatowns and frequenting restaurants, clothing stores and art shops. Local families were forced to restrict spending, and some businesses had to cut staff and hours.

Some businesses in Oakland have been unable to build back after looting and anti-Asian attacks on public transit caused many residents to fear going out after dark, said Evelyn Lee, former president of the board of directors at Oakland Asian Cultural Center. This has contributed to reduced pedestrian traffic in Chinatown, she said.

Manhattan Chinatown native David Leung took over Wo Hop Restaurant in 2016. Leung reduced his restaurant’s hours in 2020 during the Covid pandemic and watched as storefronts emptied.

Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

In Manhattan, Chinatown native David Leung, who took over Wo Hop Restaurant in 2016, remembers old-school factories making tofu and small grocery stores that recently closed. Amid rising anti-Asian sentiment and the pandemic’s harsh economic impact, Leung reduced his restaurant’s hours and watched as storefronts emptied.

“There are so many stories about Chinese restaurants around for decades, and now they’ve gotten replaced by modern types like tea shops or pastry shops,” Leung said. “Chinatown is still an Asian community, I guess, but it’s a lot more mixed than it used to be decades ago.”

To assist struggling small businesses, nonprofit organization Welcome to Chinatown distributed over $750,000 in small business grants throughout the community through its Longevity Fund, its co-founder Vic Lee said. Send Chinatown Love, which provides relief and growth efforts, raised over $1.1 million for the neighborhood and directly supported 59 merchants, according to its website.

Mei Lum is the fifth-generation owner of Wing on Wo & Co., the oldest operating store in Manhattan’s Chinatown, as well as the founder of the W.O.W. Project. She said there isn’t a robust next generation to “really problem-solve and think through these circumstantial, political, and contextual issues arising in the neighborhood.”

Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

Still, many small businesses are threatened by the changes. The new generation hasn’t frequented restaurants such as Hop Lee as often as older clientele due to differences in taste, said the restaurant’s owner, Johnny Mui.

“A lot of our businesses now, they’re more for a higher income bracket, and it’s just growing over the years slowly,” said Carry Pak, a Chinatown resident and CAAAV youth leader. “Having spaces where the immigrant community can still feel comfortable with being able to speak the language to street vendors or grocery vendors is particularly key.”

The stadium debate

Another common issue facing Chinatowns: sports arenas and other public-use venues. Some argue stadiums can provide Chinatowns with more foot traffic and opportunities, though others say they have historically destroyed homes and attracted chain businesses that outcompete Chinatown businesses.

Plans for a new Oakland Athletics ballpark a mile from the city’s Chinatown, which prompted concerns from residents, fell through last month after the team purchased land for a new stadium in Las Vegas.

In Philadelphia, plans for a new arena have irked some Chinatown residents and business owners, who say developers and city governments have neglected the community’s needs.

“We as a community need to be opposing it as much as possible in case there’s legs to this idea that the arena is going to be built,” said John Chin, executive director of the Philadelphia Chinatown Development Corporation.

Pia Singh | CNBC

A proposed $1.3 billion Sixers arena would sit blocks from the city’s Chinatown Friendship Gate. The privately funded arena is in the first stages of construction. Developers are working on gaining entitlements and approvals as the project moves toward its scheduled September 2031 opening date.

The development team expects the 18,000-seat arena to be a “major economic driver” for Philadelphians, projecting $400 million of annual economic output and 1,000 jobs.

Since the proposal was made public last summer, several Chinatown community members and residents petitioned the developers and city leaders to shutter the project. Experts previously said professional sports stadiums fail to generate significant local economic growth, and tax revenue is insufficient to make positive financial contributions.

The owner of Little Saigon Cafe in Philly’s Chinatown, a man known as “Uncle Sam,” leads a coalition of more than 40 association leaders against the arena development. Uncle Sam, a Vietnamese refugee, came to the city more than four decades ago.

“If the arena is built, it will destroy a community, destroy our culture,” he said.

“We’ll fight to the end. We’ll do everything we can to defeat this [arena] project,” said “Uncle Sam,” the owner of Little Saigon Cafe in Philadelphia’s Chinatown.

Pia Singh | CNBC

Private and government-led investments in public spaces have pushed out lower-income residents, said John Chin, executive director of the Philadelphia Chinatown Development Corp. His organization empowers native Chinese speakers to voice their opinions to Chinatown’s elected officials, city representatives and Sixers development heads.

The Sixers did not respond to a request for comment on how the development would impact Chinatown.

Last month, Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney announced the city would conduct an independent study on the arena’s impact on the community.

Staying alive — and growing

Many Chinatowns have struggled to secure government support while they contend with tough conditions in the economy and the real estate market.

Yet some Chinatown leaders remain optimistic they can work with developers to maintain the neighborhoods’ character. Some leaders doubled down on fighting developers to preserve historic architecture and businesses, while others embraced development to grow opportunities for residents.

Business owners in San Francisco’s Chinatown who spoke with CNBC said the neighborhood’s businesses, though still recovering, are keeping the city’s culture alive.

Rebecca Smith | CNBC

San Francisco Chinatown’s more than 14,000 residents, many of whom are low-income and elderly, have faced housing shortages. Modern businesses are taking over decades-old shops.

However, business owners who spoke with CNBC said Chinatown’s businesses, though still recovering, are keeping the city’s culture alive.

George Chen, who owns the contemporary Chinese restaurant China Live, remains optimistic about getting San Francisco’s Chinatown back to its heyday.

“You can look from my roof and go see pretty much the 22 blocks of Chinatown, and I think there’s a cultural relevance to keeping the immigrant story alive,” Chen said.

At least one U.S. Chinatown has grown while others shrink.

The Asian population of Chicago’s Chinatown has more than doubled in three decades, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Many new residents are Fujianese from Southeast China and have driven new restaurants, buildings and support services.

Paul Luu, CEO of Chicago’s Chinese American Service League, said families have moved from other Chinatowns to Chicago’s to take advantage of the city’s nonprofits and the growing local job market. He added that its distance from the pricier South Loop makes prices cheaper than in other cities.

The Asian population in Chicago’s Chinatown has more than doubled in three decades, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

Despite the growth, Chicago’s Chinatown is facing some of the same issues as those in other cities.

Some residents have expressed concerns about a $7 billion development called The 78, which will include high-rises, residential towers, office buildings and a riverwalk to the north of Chinatown. Some fear The 78 would raise rents and property taxes, as well as push out local businesses and residents.

Luu said The 78’s leadership team approached Chinatown leaders early in development to hear concerns and work to establish more affordable and accessible housing and commerce.

As high-end development occurs in the right locations, it can promote the local economy and encourage progress, said Homan Wong, an architect on the board of directors for the Chicago Chinatown Chamber of Commerce. He said issues of parking and safety still hurt Chicago’s Chinatown but that the Chamber remains focused on working with developers to keep the community growing.

“The opposite of development would be decay,” he said. “The reality is that if you don’t move forward, you’re going to fall behind.”

— Noah Sheidlower reported from Boston, Chicago, New York and Washington, D.C. Pia Singh reported from Philadelphia. CNBC’s Rebecca Smith contributed reporting from San Francisco.

Free Covid vaccinations for the uninsured following a public well being emergency

A health care worker prepares a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine at a immunization clinic at the Peabody Institute Library in Peabody, Massachusetts on Wednesday, January 26, 2022.

Vanessa Leroy | Bloomberg | Getty Images

For now, uninsured Americans will continue to have free access to Covid-19 vaccines even after the US public health emergency has ended.

The Biden administration on Thursday lifted the three-year-old state of emergency that had allowed the government to provide improved welfare benefits and free Covid vaccines, testing and treatment during the pandemic.

But the availability and cost of these vaccines are actually determined by the federal government’s provision of free vaccinations, not the public health emergency.

That means people with or without insurance don’t have to pay for the Covid vaccinations out of their own pocket while supplies last.

According to the Centers for Disease Control Prevention, providers of government-purchased Covid vaccines cannot charge their patients or deny them vaccinations based on a person’s insurance status.

The Biden administration ordered 171 million Omicron Covid boosters last July. Since then, about 56 million Omicron shots have been administered, according to the CDC.

This means that more than 100 million free recordings are available to the public. The government estimates that supplies could last until the fall.

“There are many, many cans left.”. As you know, the uptake of booster shots hasn’t been very good,” said Jen Kates, senior vice president of KFF, a health policy research organization.

CNBC Health and Science

Read CNBC’s latest global health coverage:

But the vast majority of Americans will not have to pay for the Covid vaccines out of their own pockets, even after federal supplies run out.

The government will shift distribution of Covid vaccines to the private market once that stock runs out.

That means vaccine manufacturers Pfizer And Modern will sell their vaccines directly to healthcare providers for around $130 per dose — a nearly five-fold increase from current prices.

Insured Americans can access Covid vaccinations as part of their insurance coverage without having to pay for them out of pocket.

Private insurers and the state Medicare and Medicaid programs are required to cover all CDC-recommended vaccinations.

But for uninsured Americans, federal and corporate programs aim to close the gap.

There are still unanswered questions about what that effort will look like.

Here’s what we know about these programs so far:

Vaccines for Children program.

The CDC Vaccines For Children program is providing free Covid vaccines to children whose families or caregivers cannot afford them after the vaccines make it to the commercial market.

Children 19 and younger who are uninsured, underinsured, or eligible for Medicaid are eligible for the permanent VFC program.

This program already offers free vaccinations for other diseases, like measles and chickenpox.

The CDC’s decision to add Covid vaccinations to the free immunization program will be critical in maintaining access for many children – particularly those who are no longer eligible for other programs.

According to a report by the Department of Health and Human Services last year, up to 5 million children are expected to lose their health coverage through Medicaid or the children’s health insurance program without a public health emergency.

HHS Bridge Access Program

The Biden administration proposed creating a permanent program similar to the VFC for uninsured adults who cannot afford Covid vaccines and immunizations for other diseases. However, Congress has not yet enacted this proposal.

Meanwhile, the government last month launched the “HHS Bridge Access Program,” a temporary measure that will make free Covid vaccinations and treatments available to uninsured Americans once those products hit the commercial market.

Under the agreement, the CDC will continue to buy Covid vaccines at a discount and distribute them through 64 state and local health departments.

This HHS effort will leverage drugmakers’ “public obligations” to provide free Covid vaccines and treatments to uninsured people. As part of these commitments, HHS expects manufacturers to ship syringes directly to pharmacies free of charge.

Kates said HHS appears to be referring to the newly announced patient assistance programs from Pfizer and Moderna, which are committed to providing free Covid vaccines and treatments to uninsured people.

“As far as I know, HHS is essentially saying it will pay pharmacies the cost of administering vaccines and treatments to the public, while manufacturers will provide free vaccines and treatments directly to pharmacies as part of their patient assistance programs,” he said Kate’s to CNBC.

Pfizer and Moderna didn’t say they would supply free vaccines to pharmacies.

Overall, Kates said the Bridge Access Program will “certainly help some uninsured Americans,” but added that it’s still “difficult to estimate” how many people would benefit and how long the program will last.

The Pfizer and Moderna programs

Pfizer and Moderna both intend to launch patient assistance programs for their Covid shots, but the companies have shared few details about those efforts.

In patient-assistance programs, pharmacies and other vaccine providers typically pay a company for a drug up front, according to Claire Hannan, executive director of the Association of Immunization Managers.

She said those providers can then apply to the program for reimbursement of the cost of that drug after administering it to an eligible patient.

Pfizer’s patient assistance program will allow eligible, uninsured Americans free access to its Covid vaccine once the vaccines hit the commercial market, according to a company spokesman. Pfizer already has a support program for its other drugs.

The company will share more information on the utility’s application process and eligibility guidelines as it becomes available, the spokesperson added.

Moderna announced in February that its patient assistance program would go into effect after the public health emergency ends.

The company did not immediately respond to CNBC’s questions about further details of the program.

Lawmakers and health policy experts have strongly criticized patient support programs for being difficult to access and understand.

A 2018 study found that providers don’t always know which patients are best suited for these programs due to a lack of clear information about eligibility and benefits.

Hannan said companies need to ensure people without insurance have easy access to a free Covid shot through their patient assistance programs.

“If you make it challenging and have them jump through multiple hurdles, vaccine uptake probably isn’t going to be what we would like,” Hannan told CNBC.

Debt ceiling defined: What it is best to know

An inverted image of the US Capitol reflected in a puddle on the Eastern Front on Tuesday, May 9, 2023. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Tom Williams | Cq-roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

The White House and Republicans in Congress are locked in a stalemate over the debt ceiling. Failure to raise or suspend interest rates could result in the US’ first-ever default. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has warned that the US could run out of money to meet its obligations as early as June 1 if Congress doesn’t deal with the matter.

With neither side likely to budge, here’s what you need to know about the situation.

What is the debt ceiling?

This is the maximum amount that Congress can borrow from the federal government to pay its bills. Since the state usually spends more money than it collects in taxes, it has to take on debt to pay its expenses. However, unlike a credit card, spending has already been approved by Congress, so the debt ceiling does not apply to new spending.

The mechanism was created during World War I to make borrowing easier. Before 1917, Congress had to approve additional debt for each new spending measure it passed. Until recently it was a rather routine process. Congress has raised the debt ceiling 78 times since 1960. The debt ceiling was last raised by $2.5 trillion in December 2021, bringing the ceiling to $31.381 trillion.

Unless Congress agrees to raise the debt ceiling, the government will have no money to pay its bills and will not pay its debts. The Treasury Department has already begun taking extraordinary measures to continue funding the government, but Yellen said she expects the funds to be fully depleted by early June.

What happens if the US defaults?

A sovereign debt default would have a devastating impact on the economy and would roil markets around the world. A default on government bonds could send the US economy into a tailspin. When Republicans in Congress last threatened to default in 2011, Standard & Poor’s downgraded the US credit rating from AAA to AA+ for the first time ever.

If the US defaulted, gross domestic product would fall by 4% and more than 7 million workers would lose their jobs, Moody’s Analytics recently predicted. Even a brief default would result in the loss of 2 million jobs, according to the data.

In this scenario, according to Fitch Ratings, US bond ratings would be classified as “limited default” and government bonds would be rated D until the US could resume borrowing. The Brookings Institution found that a default could result in $750 billion in higher federal borrowing costs over the next decade.

Furthermore, a default would shake the US position on the world stage. US Intelligence Director Avril Haines told the Senate Intelligence Committee last week that Russia and China would take advantage of a potential US default. Haines warned the two nations were trying to “highlight the chaos within the United States that we are unable to function as a democracy.”

What about government programs?

Should the US default, it would mean a tens of billions of dollars in pause in payments. The Bipartisan Policy Center estimates that in the first half of June, $50 billion in Social Security benefits, $20 billion in payments to Medicaid providers, $12 billion in veteran benefits, $6 billion in federal salaries and $1 billion -Dollars in SNAP benefits will be removed.

In an interview with CNBC on Monday, Yellen declined when asked how payments would be prioritized.

“There are no good options; every option is a bad option,” Yellen said. “I really don’t want to discuss them and rank them because, as every Treasury Secretary knows, the only option that’s really going to keep our economy and financial system in good shape is to raise the debt ceiling and make it clear that Congress is behind it.” stands.” The rationale is that America pays its bills.”

What is the Republican position?

Republicans are concerned about the rising national debt, which has grown from less than $1 trillion in the 1980s to over $30 trillion today. They refuse to raise the debt ceiling without spending cuts.

Republicans in the House of Representatives passed the Limit, Save and Grow Act last month, outlining the areas they want to limit. The bill would see sweeping cuts in discretionary federal spending, mandate new work requirements for welfare recipients, and expand mining and fossil fuel production — all in exchange for a debt ceiling hike for about a year.

What is the position of the White House?

The White House insists it is Congress’s responsibility to raise the debt ceiling unconditionally, as it has done three times under the Trump administration. President Joe Biden has repeatedly urged House Republicans to pass a clean debt ceiling hike and hold separate talks on budget spending cuts.

The president has asked lawmakers to engage in “normal arguments” rather than ultimatums.

“Like I’ve always said, we can discuss where we save, how much we spend, how we finally redesign the tax system so that everyone pays their fair share, or we can continue on the path we’re on but not below Threat of default,” Biden said on Friday. “Let’s eliminate the risk of default. Let’s argue normally. So we need to openly discuss a budget process for all of you to see.”

What’s next?

Leaders from both parties need to continue talks to reach a compromise before the scheduled June 1 deadline. If not, the Treasury Department must start making decisions about which bills to prioritize before it completely runs out of money, which Yellen has called untenable.

Most People do not get publicity alerts on their cell telephones

In most states, Americans will no longer receive notifications of a Covid infection on their smartphones after the end of the US public health emergency.

As of 2020, almost 30 countries are using a Bluetooth system developed by Apple And Google to track the spread of Covid infections and to send push notifications to all smartphone users who have been in close contact with a person who has tested positive for the virus.

The national server running the system was hosted by the Association of Public Health Laboratories.

On Thursday, the organization said that “a majority of states” stopped using the exposure reporting system after the Biden administration ended the public health emergency on May 11.

APHL added that key components of the system are no longer supported, which should help Millions of Americans are tracking their exposures and making decisions about isolating and testing for the virus.

In a joint statement Apple And Google did not address states’ decisions to stop using the system.

The tech giants told CNBC the system has helped health officials fight Covid in a way that protects privacy, citing how it tracks infections without capturing users’ location or identities.

California, New York, Massachusetts, Washington, Virginia, New Mexico and Colorado are among the states that have said they will stop using the system after the U.S. declaration of emergency ends.

“These systems should be shut down the same day the country’s COVID-19 state of emergency ends,” California’s Department of Health and Human Services said in a statement late Thursday.

Several states used the system to create apps that smartphone users could download, such as CA Notify and WA Notify.

States also provided exposure notifications through a built-in feature in Apple and Google’s operating systems.

This method required state health departments to submit a configuration file to Apple and Google with their contact information and Covid notices. The two tech companies would use the file to set up a feature on phones that users could turn on to receive notifications.

On Friday, some Apple users who opted in for this feature received push notifications informing them that their iPhones “stop logging nearby devices and you won’t be alerted to potential compromises.”

An Apple user shared in a Twitter post that their warning read, “Your public health agency has disabled exposure notifications.”

However, as of Friday afternoon, not all Apple and Google users in states that no longer use the exposure reporting system have received similar warnings.

Neither Apple nor Google addressed why some users received notifications while others did not.

There’s no clear figure on how many Americans have turned on the exposure notification feature on their phones or downloaded apps over the past three years.

Virginia estimates that since the launch of these tools in 2020, more than 3 million users have downloaded the state’s app or used the notification feature.

New Mexico said the “majority” of residents have the notifications feature turned on on their phones. According to the state, more than 1.5 million alerts have been sent to users who may have been exposed to Covid.

Washington said the state has generated more than 2.5 million exposure alerts through its app or alerts feature.

Researchers in Washington found that the state’s notification tools saved an estimated 30 to 120 lives and likely prevented about 6,000 Covid cases in the first four months after their launch in November 2020.

Despite these benefits, some Americans are skeptical about tools used to report Covid exposure.

A 2021 report by the US Government Accountability Office said the public had raised privacy concerns. The report says the public may not trust both local governments and tech companies to handle sensitive health information.

State decisions to halt Covid exposure reporting are part of a broader shift in how the country is responding to the pandemic.

Health officials have eased Covid restrictions like masking and social distancing over the past year as more Americans have been vaccinated and vaccinated against the virus.

This culminated in the end of the public health emergency, which phased out much of the funding and flexibility that had helped expand Covid testing, insurance coverage and access to healthcare during the pandemic.

Still, more than 1,000 Americans die from Covid every week, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

FDA lifts blood donation ban on homosexual and bisexual males

The FDA According to the New York Times, the country has eased much of its long-standing ban on gay and bisexual men donating blood.

Gay and bisexual men – but only those in monogamous relationships – can now donate blood in the United States without having to give up sex.

The FDA is ending the ban on gay and bisexual men donating blood, but some restrictions still apply

Instead, the FDA will now require all potential donors to fill out a form with details of their recent sexual history, the Times reports. This applies regardless of sexual orientation, sex or gender.

These questions will include whether a person has had anal sex in the past three months and whether they have had sex with new or multiple partners in the same period.

However, several prohibitions remain in place for people who have new or multiple sexual partners or have engaged in anal sex in the past three months. The ban also extends to those prescribed oral PrEP to prevent HIV infection.

Meanwhile, blood supply shortages and new donations have prompted the FDA to revise its guidelines, in what critics say is discriminatory.

The FDA’s latest move is to expand donor availability after donations plummeted due to the COVID-19 pandemic

Blood donations fell during and after the pandemic because there were fewer blood drives in schools and offices.

The FDA said the new screening policy adjustments remain in line with regulations in the UK and Canada.

This is the FDA’s latest move to expand donor eligibility and increase donation numbers. The move also comes amid widespread pressure from LGBTQ groups, who say the ban is discriminatory.

Meanwhile, those who previously tested positive for HIV are still unable to donate blood. Anyone who takes medication for HIV prevention through sexual contact remains blocked for up to three months after the last dose.

The federal agency reports that certain HIV medications (PrEP) can often delay detection of the virus on screening tests.

Updated blood donation guidelines were finalized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Thursday, easing restrictions on men having sex with men. pic.twitter.com/AWWjCIKC6p

— CGTN America (@cgtnamerica) May 11, 2023

A history of blood donation restrictions for gay and bisexual men, current screening issues

Each potential blood donor must answer questions about their sex history, drug use (injectable medications), new tattoos, and new piercings.

The blood is then tested for HIV, hepatitis C, syphilis and other infectious diseases before being eligible for donation, according to the Times.

It’s just the FDA’s latest move to adapt to the new societal mores of recent years.

In 2015, the FDA lifted a lifetime ban on men having sex with men before requiring a year’s abstinence, according to NPR.

A few years later, the federal agency shortened the abstinence period from 12 months to three months.

The decline in donations during the COVID-19 pandemic was primarily the trigger for the reduction in abstinence periods.

Years later, regulators said there had still been no negative impact on the blood supply due to the coronavirus.

Tax loophole in Inflation Discount Act encourages leasing

Dave Walters of Orange County, California stands by his newly leased Hyundai Ioniq 5 electric vehicle.

Provided by Dave Walters

Fed up with high gas prices and lured by federal tax breaks, Dave Walters decided to buy an all-electric Hyundai Ioniq 5 for his next vehicle.

The Orange County, California resident initially considered buying a used model until learning he could lease the vehicle and take advantage of a key loophole in the Inflation Reduction Act.

Buying a used Ioniq made in South Korea and Indonesia wouldn’t earn him a $7,500 rebate through a federal tax credit. The vehicle would be leased.

“I ran through the numbers – what it would be without the lease loan and with the lease loan – and it kind of overdid me and that was the main reason I went in that direction,” he said. “It was a few hundred dollars less a month.”

Walters is exactly the type of consumer Hyundai engine and other automakers have begun hiring electric car leases to take advantage of a loophole in the IRA that allows vehicles manufactured outside of North America to qualify for the credits. It’s something lawmakers like U.S. Senator Joe Manchin, DW.V., wanted to block with the rules.

Under the IRA, leasing is categorized as It is a commercial business and is therefore exempt from regulations requiring the vehicle and battery components to be manufactured in North America. Most electric vehicles for sale today are not eligible for the full tax credit due to where the vehicles or components were manufactured.

Senator Joe Manchin, DW.V., speaks with other members of the House of Representatives before a joint session of Congress in the U.S. Capitol in Washington April 27, 2023.

Elizabeth Franz | Reuters

But leasing could save motorists thousands, as long as the companies that get the loans pass the savings on to consumers.

“I’m not surprised manufacturers are saying they will offer more leasing,” said Charlie Chesbrough, chief economist at Cox Automotive. “For the IRA to use electric vehicles and allow them to qualify for the $7,500 is truly a game changer and it has a huge impact on our monthly payment.”

Chesbrough estimates that the full $7,500 tax credit for a $50,000 electric vehicle and a 36-month lease equates to a monthly savings of $222 for a consumer.

Auto research firm Edmunds reports that about 37% of electric vehicles purchased in April were leased, up from 25% in the first quarter and 13% last year.

“It kind of creates a loophole for automakers to target more affluent customers who are more likely to be able to afford an EV and actually get approval to buy it,” said Jessica Caldwell, Executive Director of Insights at Edmunds. “It also allows them to level the playing field against the competition, which gets the full tax credit on purchase.”

According to Hyundai Motor America CEO Randy Parker, the percentage of Hyundai Ioniq 5 vehicles leased rose from about 2% earlier this year to over 30% in April. As of this month, the company is offering to lease the vehicle for $499 per month — less than the industry average lease rate of $577, according to Edmunds.

The Kia EV6 will be on display at the April 13, 2022 New York Auto Show.

Scott Mill | CNBC

“We want to continue to push and highlight leasing as much as we can so that we can continue to benefit from the tax credit and consumers can benefit from the tax credit,” Parker told CNBC. “Right now, that’s how the cards are dealt.”

Kia and Ford also say they will look to increase leasing of their electric vehicles to lower prices and increase sales.

Kia expects to increase its leasing share of electric vehicles from under 15% currently to as much as 40% in the coming months, Watson said. Like Hyundai, Kia is offering its EV6 on a $499 lease with a $4,999 down payment.

“Over the next few years, Kia will have to rely heavily on leasing to pass the $7,500 credit on to customers. And that’s what we want to do,” said Eric Watson, vice president of sales operations for Kia Americas.

Prior to the IRA’s passage, Hyundai and Kia, owned by the same South Korean parent company, were second only to Tesla in US electric vehicle sales. But their sales have since lagged behind those of General Motors and Ford, both of which have vehicles that are eligible for some or all of the federal tax credits.

Hyundai and other automakers that were no longer eligible for loans under the IRA opposed the rules, calling for a longer relaxation period for the new rules or broad exemptions based on their U.S. electric-vehicle plans.

“It gives us a lifeline. I wouldn’t call it a level playing field,” Watson said of the lease eligibility for the $7,500 tax credit.

President Joe Biden stands next to a Ford Mustang Mach-E SUV during a visit to the Detroit Auto Show to highlight manufacturing of electric vehicles in America September 14, 2022.

Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

A Ford spokesman said the company’s credit department is working on a leasing strategy for electric vehicles like the Mustang Mach-E, which is made in Mexico and is currently eligible for half the federal tax credit on purchase. The company’s electric Ford F-150 Lightning is eligible for the full $7,500.

“We’re going to be leasing electric vehicles and you’ll be hearing more about that from us soon,” Ford CFO John Lawler said last month.

A spokesman for GM said the company is not changing its electric vehicle leasing strategy because all of its vehicles are eligible for the full tax credit. Only about 3% of GM’s electric vehicles are leased, he said.

While lease terms are typically only a few years, automakers have touted that electric vehicles are attracting new customers to their brands.

“I think the sooner you get these customers on to your brand, especially with the new technology, the better chance you have of retaining them,” Edmunds’ Caldwell said.

And term leasing could be an attractive option for many consumers like Walters, who traded in a Nissan Murano in 2009, as electric vehicles remain an emerging industry with changing technologies and a significant number of new entrants.

“I wanted to check it out and see if I really liked it. It’s only been six weeks but so far it’s been really good.” said Walters. “It’s really fun to drive and I really enjoy not having to pay for gas.”

Leqembi might value Medicare $5 billion a 12 months

Alzheimer’s drug Leqembi can be seen in this undated handout picture obtained by Reuters on January 20, 2023.

Eisai | Reuters

New Alzheimer’s antibody treatment Leqembi could cost Medicare up to $5 billion a year, according to a study published this week in a leading medical journal.

Medicare would spend about $2 billion a year if about 85,700 patients tested positive for the disease and were treated with it Eisai And biogenic Product Leqembi, according to the study published Thursday in JAMA Internal Medicine.

According to the study, the program would spend $5 billion for seniors if approximately 216,500 patients are eligible for the breakthrough treatment.

The authors said the estimated costs for Medicare are conservative and that spending on Leqembi could increase more than expected depending on demand and other factors.

The researchers who conducted the JAMA study included physicians and Public health and policy experts. They are affiliated with the University of California Los Angeles, Rand Corporation, Harvard Medical School and the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, among others.

Eisai and Biogen have priced the twice-monthly antibody infusions at $26,500 per year.

There are also additional annual costs estimated at $7,300 per patient associated with visits to the neurologist, MRI and PET scans, administration of IV fluids, and monitoring and treatment of possible side effects, according to the researchers.

The study assumed that Medicare would cover 80% of the cost, while patients would have to pay all or part of the remaining 20%, depending on whether they had supplemental insurance.

According to the study, patients could expect an annual bill of about $6,600 per year, depending on which state they live in and whether they have supplemental insurance. Some lower-income people who are eligible for Medicare and Medicaid would not pay anything out of pocket.

CNBC Health and Science

Read CNBC’s latest global health coverage:

The Alzheimer’s Association, which works to help patients with the disease, estimates that Alzheimer’s and other forms of dementia will cost the United States $345 billion this year. According to the association, these costs could increase to $1 trillion by 2050.

“This is the case without treatment. Prevention and treatment is the only way to reduce these costs over time,” Robert Egge, the association’s head of public policy, said in a statement.

“But it’s not the cost that should decide whether people have access to life-improving care – it’s the impact on people,” Egge said. “Treatments in early-stage Alzheimer’s disease could lead to a better quality of life.”

Clinical study results published in the New England Journal of Medicine in January showed that Leqembi had a beneficial effect on patients with early Alzheimer’s disease.

The expensive treatment is currently unavailable to the vast majority of patients because Medicare has severely restricted coverage of the antibody.

Medicare has promised to provide broader coverage for Leqembi if the FDA grants full approval for the treatment in July. Leqembi received accelerated approval from the Food and Drug Administration in January.

The Alzheimer’s Association, congressmen and attorneys general are pushing for Medicare to drop its restrictions and give Leqembi full coverage.

Antibody treatment, which targets brain plaques associated with the disease, slowed cognitive decline by 27% in Eisai’s clinical trial.

There are currently no other drugs on the market that have shown comparable effectiveness in slowing down Alzheimer’s disease. Eli Lilly’s Donanemab showed promising clinical trial results earlier this month. The company plans to file for full FDA approval this quarter.

Leqembi and donanemab both carry a serious risk of brain swelling and bleeding.

Biden attracted extra viewers than Trump along with his CNN City Corridor

How much has Donald Trump’s CNN Town Hall failed? In the same format and on the same channel, President Biden attracted more viewers than Trump.

The Washington Post has this interesting little note: “At a time when CNN was struggling to reverse its viewership decline, the show proved a disappointment in ratings, with Nielsen reporting just 3.1 million total viewers.” That was a big gain over CNN’s typical 8 p.m. show, but smaller audiences than CNN’s Town Hall with President Biden last summer (3.7 million) and six previous Trump Town Halls carried by Fox News — reflecting both the appeal of CNN as well as Trump questioned. ”

Which is it? Don’t people want to see CNN, or don’t people want to see Trump?

The answer is that Donald Trump copied the Fox News model of retaining followers. In terms of business structures, Trump and Fox News share the same DNA. The real implication of this dynamic is that a network that decides to host Trump is unlikely to attract as many viewers as Fox News does for the same event.

CNN seems to have many misconceptions about Trump and his supporters.

Trump himself isn’t big enough to lure Fox viewers to CNN. This dynamic suggests that CNN destroyed its credibility with an audience that would never come.

None of this explains how Biden was able to attract more viewers than Trump to CNN. There are a significant number of Americans who don’t want to see or hear Trump, and have absolutely no interest in listening to the former President and watching him play his oldies.

The numbers don’t lie, and they tell us that Joe Biden has more appeal on TV than Donald Trump.

For more stories like this, subscribe to our newsletter:

Jason is the managing editor. He is also White House press secretary and congressional correspondent for PoliticusUSA. Jason has a bachelor’s degree in political science. The focus of his thesis was on public policy with a focus on social reform movements.

Awards and professional memberships

Member of the Society of Professional Journalists and the American Political Science Association

Kendall Jenner shares cheeky bikini photographs from Tropical Getaway

The sun is shining, the rolls out!

Kendall Jenner Soaking up the sun’s rays during a recent tropical vacation with friends. As seen in photos posted to Instagram on May 11, the supermodel worked on her tan in a barely-there black bikini while lounging on a white-sand beach. One picture showed Kendall, who accessorized her cheeky two-piece suit with a bright red baseball cap, playing air guitar in the sun, while another snap showed her cooling off in the water.

Of course, the 27-year-old relaxed with a refreshing drink. She was seen in several pictures with a bottle of her 818 Tequila and a colorful cocktail.

Earlier this week, Kendall captured a shared laugh with the rumored flame bad bunny in a TikTok posted by the photographer Renell Medrano. In a moment that’s hard to miss, the two spent basking in the sun on what appeared to be a tropical golf course.

Neither Kendall nor the “Diles” have spoken publicly about the nature of their relationship, although they have been spotted together several times in recent months.