India might play an essential position within the manufacture of vaccines

A medical professional holds Covid-19 vaccine Covaxin vial during the nationwide vaccination campaign in Jaipur, Rajasthan, India, Saturday, February 6, 2021.

Vishal Bhatnagar | NurPhoto | Getty Images

India could become the second largest Covid vaccine maker in the world, and analysts say the country has the capacity to manufacture for both its own people and other developing countries.

Most of the world’s vaccines historically came from India. Even before Covid-19, the South Asian country was producing up to 60% of the world’s vaccines – and at relatively low costs.

“India was a vaccine manufacturing center before the pandemic and should be a strategic partner in vaccinating against COVID-19 worldwide,” JPMorgan analysts wrote in a report last month.

Consultancy firm Deloitte predicts India will rank second after the US in terms of coronavirus vaccine production this year. PS Easwaran, partner at Deloitte India, said more than 3.5 billion Covid vaccines could be produced in the country in 2021, compared to around 4 billion in the US

In addition, companies in India are currently increasing production to meet demand.

“We are expanding our annual capacity to deliver 700 million doses of our intramuscular COVAXIN,” said Indian company Bharat Biotech, which worked with the Indian State Council for Medical Research to develop a Covid vaccine.

Covaxin was approved for emergency use in India, but was controversial due to criticism that the approval was not transparent enough and because not enough efficacy data was published.

India vaccines suitable for developing countries

Another vaccine – known in India as Covishield and jointly developed by AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford – has also been approved as an emergency in India. It is made locally by the Serum Institute of India (SII).

SII manufactures around 50 million cans of Covishield every month, according to Reuters, and plans to grow production to 100 million cans per month by March.

Other Indian companies have agreed to make vaccines for developers such as the Russian Direct Investment Fund and the US company Johnson & Johnson. To be clear, these vaccine candidates have not yet been approved for use.

“Even without successful vaccine development from our own pipelines, the available capacity offers the opportunity to work as a contract manufacturer with approved vaccine developers in order to meet the supply needs, particularly for India and other countries [emerging markets]”said the JPMorgan report.

With a proven track record on the scale that vaccines are made, India should be able to ramp up production to meet international demand as well.

Nissy Solomon

Center for Policy Research

India’s vaccines are likely to be more suitable for developing countries, said K Srinath Reddy, president of the Public Health Foundation of India.

Some of today’s leading vaccines, such as those from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, use messenger RNA (mRNA) technology, which uses genetic material to trigger the body’s infection control process.

These vaccines require “stringent cold chain requirements” that will be difficult or even “out of the realm of possibility,” for most health systems, Reddy said.

Vaccines made in India are easier to transport and cheaper, putting the country in a better position than the US and Europe when it comes to meeting demand in developing countries, he added.

India’s “proven record”

India’s enormous manufacturing capacity also gives analysts confidence that the country can provide vaccines to other nations.

New Delhi has pledged to send vaccines to its neighboring countries and has already delivered 15.6 million doses to 17 countries, according to Reuters.

“India’s manufacturing capacity is sufficient to meet domestic demand,” said Nissy Solomon, senior research associate at the Center for Public Policy Research (CPPR).

“With a proven track record of the same scale as vaccines, India should be able to ramp up production to meet international demand as well,” she told CNBC.

Solomon added that the country is monitoring domestic needs before making decisions about exports.

For its part, Bharat Biotech said it was “fully prepared to meet the needs of India and global public health”.

Vaccine storage and distribution challenge

However, there will be challenges as the country attempts to meet vaccine demand in India and beyond.

Jefferies stock analyst Abhishek Sharma wrote in a note that vaccine adoption in India has been slow. Even assuming the speed of vaccination will increase, Sharma estimates that only 22% of India’s 1.38 billion people can be vaccinated in one year.

That is roughly the number of people India would like to vaccinate by July or August.

“The supply of vaccines is less of an issue than the storage, distribution and intake of vaccines,” said Solomon of CPPR.

“India is unable to store and distribute such large quantities to the masses,” she said, adding that the country should “strategically” choose vaccines that do not need to be stored in extreme temperatures.

I would say that [these challenges are] more like speed limiters slowing the program down than actual roadblocks where the program must be stopped.

K Srinath Reddy

Public Health Foundation of India

The vaccines India is currently manufacturing require normal refrigeration. However, the vaccines manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech must be stored at extremely cold temperatures of minus 70 degrees Celsius, while those made by Moderna must be stored at minus 20 degrees Celsius (minus 4 degrees Fahrenheit).

The “real challenge” lies in the sheer number of people who need to be vaccinated, said Reddy of the Public Health Foundation of India.

“This is the first time an adult vaccination program has been carried out on such an unprecedented scale,” he told CNBC.

He said vaccination programs usually focus on vaccinating children and mothers, and the logistics network may not be prepared to handle vaccines for entire populations.

Reddy suggested using the existing food cold chain for vaccines, hoping this could be resolved.

“I would say that [these challenges are] more like speed limiters slowing down the program than actual roadblocks where the program has to be stopped, “he said.

‘Silence of the Lambs’ celebrates 30th anniversary

Jodie Foster and Anthony Hopkins star in “Silence of the Lambs.”

Orion Pictures

“Believe me, you do not want Hannibal Lecter inside your head,” veteran FBI Agent Jack Crawford warns trainee Clarice Starling, and viewers, at the start of Jonathan Demme’s Academy Award-winning film “Silence of the Lambs.”

Thirty years later, the charming, yet monstrous, villain remains fresh in the minds of modern audiences.

“Silence of the Lambs” is not the first film to delve into the twisted mind of Dr. Lecter, and certainly wasn’t the last. It’s based on Thomas Harris’ novel of the same name, which was actually the second book he wrote centered around the prolific and eerily bewitching serial killer, a follow-up to the hit “Red Dragon.”

Released on Valentine’s Day in 1991, “Silence of the Lambs” was a low-budget sleeper hit that gradually gained widespread critical acclaim and box office success. With Demme at the helm, the film was not only lauded as a cinematic work of art, but has had a lasting impact on Hollywood.

The film follows a young FBI trainee named Clarice Starling who is tasked with interviewing the brilliant psychiatrist Dr. Hannibal Lecter, who has been imprisoned for murder and cannibalism. Senior FBI Agent Jack Crawford believes that Lecter may have insight into an ongoing serial murder case and Starling could be the perfect bait to get his cooperation.

Starring Jodie Foster as Clarice and Anthony Hopkins as Dr. Lecter, “Silence of the Lambs” quickly captured the imaginations of moviegoers.

“When I think back on the movies I really remember seeing in theaters, you know… it’s an alarmingly short number,” said Robert Thompson, a professor at Syracuse University and a pop culture expert. “I left the theater thinking I had seen a movie to be reckoned with, in a way I didn’t usually feel leaving the theater.”

A big win for the horror genre

The film opened on a Thursday, garnering $1.4 million in ticket sales domestically. By the end of the weekend, it had tallied $11.6 million, according to data from Comscore.

And that was after running in less than 1,500 theaters, a relatively small number compared to modern day wide releases which often debut in up to 5,400 locations, explained Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst at Comscore.

The film had long legs in theaters, running for eight months and collecting more than $130.7 million in the U.S. and Canada and a total of $275 million worldwide.

Although not the first horror film to be nominated for the Academy Awards, or for the ceremony’s best picture honor, it was the first film in the genre to win the top award. In fact, “Silence of the Lambs” swept the 1992 Oscars, becoming only the third film in history to win best film, best director, best actor, best actress and best adapted screenplay.

“It Happened One Night” and “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest” were the only films to previously achieve this distinction and no film has done it since.

“It was horror as presented by the Louvre,” Dergarabedian said.

Best Actor recipient Anthony Hopkins, Best Actress recipient Jodie Foster and Best Director recipient Jonathan Demme hold their Oscars at the 64th annual Academy Awards March 30, 1992 in Los Angeles, CA.

John T. Barr | Hulton Archive | Getty Images

While the horror genre has often been synonymous with blood, gore and jump scares, it’s actually a bit more broad and nuanced. Generally, the horror genre encapsulates any form of storytelling that is intended to scare, shock or stir up dread and terror in an audience.

This can take on many forms. “Silence of the Lambs,” for example is a psychological thriller in addition to being a horror film. Whereas a movie like “Poltergeist” is a supernatural horror film or “Shaun of the Dead” is a comedic horror film.

“If you define what the horror genre was before ‘Silence of the Lambs,’ it wasn’t all goofy slashers,” Thompson said. “There had been intelligent horror films, but I think there was a sense with ‘Silence of the Lambs’ that really did change the idea of what could constitute a horror movie. “It wasn’t so much about the moments of screaming, it was a much more almost quiet sense of absolute hopeless terror.”

Filmmakers had blended genres long before Demme’s “Silence of the Lambs.” The film arrived in Hollywood at a time when the horror genre had become inundated with “creatively exhausted” slasher films, said Adam Lowenstein, professor at the University of Pittsburgh and director of the Horror Studies Working Group.

After the success of films like “Halloween,” “Nightmare on Elm Street” and “Friday the 13th,” the entertainment industry began to churn out films in the slasher subgenre. While there were a number of horror films produced in the ’80s and ’90s that went on to cultivate cult audiences, the majority of films were widely panned by critics and the category was soon thought of as inferior compared to other genres.

“I saw it when it came out and I was very impressed and very excited,” Lowenstein said. “Not just because it was a good movie, but because I was excited for the genre at large because here was in my mind an undeniable horror film that was winning all sorts of acclaim and it felt like a breakthrough in a sense.”

Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal Lecter in “Silence of the Lambs.”

Orion Pictures

Prior to “Silence of the Lambs,” there had only been two films in the horror genre nominated for best picture since the very first Oscars ceremony in 1929 — “The Exorcist” in 1974 and “Jaws” in 1976.

In the years that followed, only three joined that list. “The Sixth Sense” was nominated for the top prize in 2000, “Black Swan” in 2011 and “Get Out” in 2018.

There is some debate within the entertainment community about whether Guillermo del Toro’s “The Shape of Water,” which won best picture in 2018, should be considered along these other films. After all, del Toro’s film was inspired by “Creature From the Black Lagoon.”

Lowenstein argued in favor of this. However, it seems that the film’s horror elements are overshadowed by other classifications like fantasy, romance and drama.

The brilliance of Jonathan Demme

Much of the success of “Silence of the Lambs” as a film is due to Demme. The filmmaker, who studied under horror legend Roger Corman, dialed back on the gore, at least for the first two-thirds of the film, and relied on tight close ups, editing and exposition to stir dread and terror in audiences.

With only around 16 minutes of screen time, Hannibal Lecter looms over all of the characters in the film. Ahead of his first appearance, Clarice is repeatedly warned about him. Crawford tells her not to let him into her head and Dr. Chilton, the director of the sanitarium in which Lecter resides, describes in detail how she is to behave around the imprisoned psychiatrist.

He then shows Clarice the reason the sanitarium insists on such precautions. Lecter had complained of chest pains nearly a decade before and was brought to the building’s medical center for an EKG. When his restraints and mouthpiece were removed, he brutally attacked a nurse.

“The doctors managed to reset her jaw more or less,” Chilton says, showing Clarice a picture. “Saved one of her eyes. His pulse never got above 85, even when he ate her tongue.”

The audience is not privy to the image, but the implied violence is enough to set a firm picture of “Hannibal the Cannibal.” That is, until audiences first lay eyes on him.

Jodie Foster and Anthony Hopkins star in “Silence of the Lambs.”

Orion Pictures

The man waiting for Clarice to approach his cell is a gentleman. His speech is impeccable, a cutting and succinct dialect that Hopkins said he mirrored from Hal 9000, the evil computer from “2001: A Space Odyssey.”

The camera begins cutting between Clarice and Hannibal, extreme close-ups that seem to suggest the characters are speaking to the audience and not each other, and the terror builds.

“Hopkins is only in it for 16 minutes,” Thompson said. “That piece of data is a real testimony to the real power of that movie and the highly disturbing nature of the message that I left [the theater] with. The intellectualizing of horrible behavior, the idea that this really monstrous character thought and behaved in ways that were rational and intelligent and ways in which I was taught to admire.”

It is only in the last third of the film when audiences get a glimpse at the physical monster lurking beneath the surface. Lecter, who had been planning his escape since the beginning, savagely beats two guards; hangs one from the rafters of the court house, disembowled, and carves the face from the other, using it to pose as the deceased officer in order to gain transport in an ambulance.

“Demme is not afraid to showcase [the film’s] attachments to the genre,” Lowenstein said. “He understands the need to alternate graphic violence and implied violence. You increase the impact of each by alternating them. ‘Silence of the Lambs’ does that very well.”

The case of Buffalo Bill

One piece of “Silence of the Lambs,” which has become a hot topic in recent years, is its portrayal of Buffalo Bill.

In Harris’ novel and Demme’s film, Jame Gumb is a disturbed man. He is a man who kidnaps women so he can make suits from their skins. Within the film, Gumb dances around wearing women’s clothing, a woman’s scalp complete with blond hair, and has had a homosexual relationship with a least one man.

On the surface, the character is very negative stereotype of the LGBTQ community. However, in both the book and the film, it is pointed out that Gumb is not actually a transsexual person.

“Look for severe childhood disturbances associated with violence,” Dr. Lecter tells Clarice about the serial killer. “Our Billy wasn’t born a criminal, Clarice. He was made one through years of systematic abuse. Billy hates his own identity, you see, and he thinks that makes him a transsexual. But his pathology is a thousand times more savage and more terrifying.”

Ted Levine as Jame Gumb aka Buffalo Bill in “Silence of the Lambs.”

Orion Pictures

“When ‘Silence of the Lambs’ came out, the list of trans characters in big movies and in television was a pretty short list,” Thompson said.

While the filmmakers intention may not have been to showcase the trans community in this way, with so few of these characters in the industry, having someone who is questioning their identity be a savage serial killer didn’t help public perception of transgender individuals.

Not to mention, during the time that “Silence of the Lambs” was released, the majority of transgender characters were either portrayed as prostitutes or male characters dressing in drag for comedic effect.

“There’s no doubt that we live in a time now that our awareness of not just queer but trans issues is so much more nuanced and mainstream,” Lowenstein said. “There’s no doubt that the portrayal of Buffalo Bill would have to undergo a rewrite of some kind and would have to deal with it in a more in-depth way.”

“I don’t think it disqualifies the film from admiration or further study,” he continued. “It is, as all film, a product of its era. It’s valuable to go back and study old films. They tell us something about the time they came from.”

An enduring legacy

“Silence of the Lambs” helped elevate the horror genre in the decades after its release, but it also had a clear rippling effect across the entertainment industry.

Harris wrote four novels that centered around the character of Dr. Lecter — “Red Dragon,” “Silence of the Lambs,” “Hannibal” and “Hannibal Rising” — and there have been adaptations of each in the last four decades.

However, Demme’s film took Harris’ work and brought it into the mass culture. The iconic portrayal of Dr. Lecter by Hopkins, the quiet and profound performance by Foster and the psychological elements of the film that captured audiences and filmmakers in 1991 are still influencing them today.

Nearly 30 years to the day of the anniversary of “Silence of the Lambs” debuting in theaters, CBS launched a series called “Clarice” which follows the newly minted FBI agent a year after the events of “Silence of the Lambs.”

Clarice Starling and the VICAP team are deployed to Tennessee where the FBI is laying siege against a fringe militia group called “The Statesmen,” on CBS’ “Clarice.” , Thursday, Feb. 18 (10:00-11:00 PM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network. Pictured Rebecca Breeds as Clarice Starling (Photo by Brooke Palmer/CBS via Getty Images)

CBS Photo Archive | CBS | Getty Images

Only a few years ago, NBC had a three-season series called “Hannibal,” which followed the psychiatrist in the time leading up to his arrest.

Outside of direct adaptations, “Silence of the Lambs” has inspired and laid the groundwork for numerous projects.

“You look at a series like ‘Dexter,’ it owes so much to ‘Silence of the Lambs,'” Thompson said.

The Showtime series, which ran for eight seasons, follows Dexter Morgan, a Miami-based blood spatter expert who doesn’t just solve murders, he commits them, too. He’s a serial killer, but only murders the guilty. His adoptive father, recognizing his homicidal urges at a young age, taught him to hone his skills and use them for good.

Dexter is an antihero that, by all accounts, audiences should be rooting against. However, he is portrayed as a normal guy who rationalizes his addiction — murder — in such a straight-forward way that viewers begin to rationalize it, too. His intellect, tenacity and sense of justice almost shield him from ire. The audience sympathizes with him.

Then there is NBC’s series “The Blacklist,” which started as a show about a career criminal named Raymond Reddington who turns himself in to the FBI, but will only talk to Agent Elizabeth Keen, who is coincidentally starting her first day at the bureau.

James Spader stars as Raymond Reddington in “The Blacklist” on NBC.

NBC

When Keen first meets Reddington, he’s sat in a glass cage waiting for her with a similar expression as Dr. Lecter had while waiting for Clarice to arrive. While the show ultimately deviated from “Silence of the Lambs,” its initial premise centered heavily around Reddington using his expertise while incarcerated to help Keen solve crimes and apprehend criminals.

A similar storytelling setup can be found in Fox’s “Prodigal Son,” although the Hannibal/Clarice relationship is now between a father and son.

Malcolm bright is an ex-FBI agent turned NYPD consultant whose father, Martin Whitly, is a serial killer known as “The Surgeon.” Malcolm is forced on multiple occasions to consult with his father on cases because of his unique insights into the psychology of criminals and murders.

Tom Payne and Michael Sheen star in Fox’s “Prodigal Son.”

Fox

Some of the marketing for “Prodigal Son” even featured Whitly standing behind his son, mimicking the iconic shot of Clarice with Dr. Lecter.

“‘Silence of the Lambs’ opened the door for other filmmakers,” Dergarabedian said. “You could pitch unconventional heroes and antiheroes and not get a boot out the door.”

Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal and CNBC.

Meghan Markle’s being pregnant announcement gown has a particular which means

Meghan Markle is expecting Baby No. 2 with Prince Harry

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry continue to prove that they are the definition of relationship goals!

The couple who are proud parents of their 21 month old son Archie Harrison, announced on Valentine’s Day that her family is growing.

“We can confirm that Archie will be a big brother,” a spokesman for the couple said in a statement on Sunday, February 14. “The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are overjoyed to have their second child.”

While many fans are dying to learn more about the duo’s little one, both Meghan and Harry keep some details to themselves – like their baby’s gender and the former suit star’s expected due date.

The timing of Meghan’s pregnancy was especially sweet for many reasons, with the obvious fact that she and Harry shared the exciting news about the romantic vacation.

However, the couple paid tribute to the deceased Princess Diana in a special way. As royal fans will remember, Princess Diana announced that she was pregnant and was expecting her second child Prince Charles (aka Prince Harry!) on – wait for it – Feb. 13, 1984.

CDC investigating the dying of a Nebraska man who obtained a dose of Covid vaccine

Vials and a medical syringe are displayed in front of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) US logo. The FDA finds the COVID-19 vaccine.

Pavlo Gonchar | LightRocket | Getty Images

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will investigate the death of a Nebraska man after local health officials listed the Covid-19 vaccine as one of several causes of death, the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services said in a press release on late Thursday with.

The man, a long-term care facility in his late forties with multiple concurrent diseases and conditions, died on January 17 between one and two weeks after receiving his first dose of a Covid-19 vaccine.

The CDC and FDA received 1,170 reports of deaths in people in the United States who received Covid vaccine between December 14 and February 7 – 0.003% of those vaccinated. During that time, over 41 million doses of Pfizer or Moderna’s Covid were administered 19 vaccines across the country, according to the CDC.

“Typically, deaths from COVID-19 vaccines can be attributed to anaphylaxis and occur relatively soon after the vaccine is administered, so monitoring is done,” said Dr. Gary Anthone, Nebraska Chief Medical Officer.

“While I can’t speculate about this case, if people die days or weeks after being given the vaccine, it is more likely to be due to other underlying factors,” Anthone said.

The death was recorded on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, a national vaccination safety monitoring program run by the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration. All adverse events or deaths must be reported to the system if they occur after vaccination.

“This process enables the CDC and FDA to closely monitor and assess adverse events for ongoing safety assessments,” said a statement from the state health department.

The CDC has not reported any patterns for cause of death that would suggest safety issues with the vaccines.

People with high-risk diseases should consult their medical providers about vaccination, Anthone said.

GM introduces absolutely electrical Chevy Bolt EUV and a redesigned, lower-cost Bolt EV

2022 BOLTS EUV

Source: Chevrolet

General Motors is taking another step towards its zero-emission future.

The Detroit-based company presented a new, fully electric Chevy Bolt Electric Utility Vehicle (EUV) on Sunday evening in addition to its redesigned Chevy Bolt Electric Vehicle. The new Chevy Bolt EUV is designed to bring out the best of the Chevy Bolt, which was first launched in 2017, but in a larger and longer SUV-like ratio, according to GM executives.

The vehicles are the first from Chevrolet to be equipped with GM’s Super Cruise semi-autonomous motorway driving system, which uses facial recognition to determine if the driver is paying attention so they don’t have to touch the steering wheel while the system is in operation.

Super Cruise is restricted to more than 200,000 miles of restricted-access freeways in the US and Canada that have been fitted with a lidar card to support the onboard system of cameras, radars and sensors.

The new 2022 Bolt commercial vehicle, which starts at $ 33,995, is about 6 inches longer than the Bolt EV and has a “modern, muscular design, roomier interior, and plenty of rear legroom.” The vehicle has a “distinctive front end with a shaped grille”, standard LED headlights and an upscale interior, according to GM managers.

2022 BOLTS EUV

Source: Chevrolet

The revamped 2022 Bolt EV, which starts at $ 31,995, includes a number of new design updates. GM cut the starting price for the new Bolt EV by more than $ 5,000 from the 2021 model, which starts at under $ 37,000, as the cost of battery technology dropped.

The hatchback features a more upright bumper cover or fascia and updated interior seats that are “more comfortable with a triangular geometric pattern and contrasting stitching that offer a more upscale appearance,” said Jesse Ortega, chief engineer of the new Bolt EV and EUV on a media call with reporters.

Both new vehicles have an infotainment color touchscreen with a diagonal of 10.2 inches and an integrated climate control “for clean, intuitive user interfaces”.

The Bolt EV has a range of 259 miles when fully charged, while the Bolt EUV reaches 250 miles. Using the myChevrolet Mobile App, drivers can view their current charging status, adjust their charging settings and set up notifications.

“As of 2017, we’ve sold more than 100,000 Bolt EVs worldwide and our owners have accumulated more than 1.2 billion miles of EV trips,” said Steven Majoros, Chevy vice president of marketing, to the reporter. “Bolt EV helped make Chevrolet the best-selling EV brand, and current Bolt EV sales increased 26% in 2020.”

The new and refurbished vehicles are part of the company’s plan to bring 30 new electric vehicles to market worldwide by 2025. The updated Bolt EV was due to hit the market last year, but GM delayed the vehicle due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

“We’d like to fit all of them into an electric vehicle, and the new Bolt EUV and redesigned Bolt EV are critical to that,” GM President Mark Reuss said in a statement. Industry analysts have been expecting the Bolt EUV to expand the company’s EV platform for years.

Both vehicles are powered and powered by GM’s Battery Electric Vehicle 2 platform, which was first launched in December 2016 with the Bolt EV. Since then, the company has only sold about 79,000 vehicles.

Later this year, the company’s next generation EV platform with a new battery system called the Ultium is expected to launch with the 2022 GMC Hummer EV Sport Utility Truck (SUT). Initial availability of the Hummer EV this fall starts at $ 112,595.

The Bolt EV and EUV are set to help GM reassure EV buyers, while the company expands its Ultium platform to lower the cost of next-generation EVs. Ortega told reporters it was “not intended” to move the Bolt EV to the Ultium platform.

The vehicles are part of GM’s plan to bring 30 new electric vehicles to market worldwide as part of a $ 27 billion investment in electric and autonomous vehicles from 2020 to 2025.

McConnell votes for the acquittal, however says “no query” Trump, who’s accountable for the rebellion

Minutes after the “not guilty” vote in Donald Trump’s impeachment proceedings, Senate Minority Chairman Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. Said the former president was clearly responsible for the deadly Capitol riot.

“There is no question that Trump” is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day, “said McConnell shortly after the Senate acquitted Trump of instigating the attack.” No question. “

But “the question is contentious,” said McConnell, because Trump, as a former president, “has no constitutional right to convict”.

“After much deliberation, I believe that the best reading of the Constitution shows that Article 2 Section 4 exhausts the group of people who can lawfully be tried, tried or convicted,” McConnell said.

“It’s the president, it’s the vice-president and civil servants. We have no power to convict a former incumbent who is now a private individual,” he said.

While 57 out of 100 senators found Trump guilty, the chamber fell below the two-thirds threshold required for a conviction. Seven Republican senators, along with all Democrats and Independents, voted to condemn Trump.

The House indicted Trump on January 13, a week before the end of his term in office, of an article on “incitement to rebellion.” The Democrats had pressured McConnell, who was the majority leader at the time, to quickly open a lawsuit before Trump left the White House. However, the trial itself didn’t begin until nearly three weeks after President Joe Biden was sworn in.

On Tuesday, 44 Republican Senators, including McConnell, voted that the Senate was constitutionally not even responsible for conducting a trial against a former president.

However, in his post-vote speech, McConnell endorsed the view that “President Trump is still liable for everything he did during his tenure”.

“He hasn’t gotten away with anything yet,” McConnell said, noting, “we have a criminal justice system in this country. We have civil trials. And former presidents are not immune to being.” [held] accountable by both. “

McConnell, who previously stated that Trump provoked the crowd of his supporters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, also pushed back some of the arguments made by Trump’s defense team during the trial.

“The problem is not just the moderate language spoken by the president on Jan. 6,” McConnell said, “but the whole atmosphere of impending disaster,” including “the increasingly fierce myths of a landslide election that was somehow stolen.”

Trump’s lawyers had argued extensively that what the former president had said at a pre-insurrection rally was an ordinary political speech protected by the First Amendment. McConnell argued, however, that other examples of cutting-edge political rhetoric “are different from what we’ve seen” than Trump.

Before McConnell spoke, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, DN.Y., railed against the Republicans who voted in favor of the acquittal.

“There was only one correct judgment in this process: guilty,” said Schumer.

“This was about electing a country before Donald Trump. And 43 Republican members voted for Trump,” said Schumer.

In response to the CDC director, elevating the masks necessities is a mistake

Dr. Rochelle Walensky, Joe Biden’s chief executive officer for the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), listens as Biden announces candidates and officers for his health and coronavirus response teams during a press conference at his transitional headquarters Wilmington, Delaware, December 8, 2020.

Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said Sunday it was too early for states to stop wearing masks as coronavirus cases and deaths are high in the US on a daily basis

“We still have 100,000 cases a day. We still have between 1,500 and 3,500 deaths a day,” Walensky said during an interview on CBS’s Face the Nation. “Yet we see some communities loosening some of their mitigation strategies. We are nowhere outside of the forest.”

As the spread of the virus slows in the US and the introduction of the vaccine speeds up, states have begun to relax restrictions. Republican governors in Montana and Iowa lifted statewide mask wear requirements this month. North Dakota’s mask mandate expired in January.

In New York, Democratic Governor Andrew Cuomo recently allowed indoor dining at 25% capacity despite the high risk of contagion, and opened stadiums and arenas with limited capacity.

According to a CNBC analysis of data from Johns Hopkins University, the US reports an average of more than 93,000 cases per day, a 22% decrease from the previous week and more than 3,000 deaths per day, an increase of 4% from the previous week.

The daily average of deaths in Covid may have increased over the past week as some states have conducted audits and found previously unreported deaths.

More than 480,000 people in the U.S. have died from the virus and more than 27 million have been infected.

Health experts fear that the rapid spread of more contagious variants could lead to a renewed spike in cases and deaths in the United States. Cases of the contagious variant, first found in the UK and known as B.1.1.7, double roughly every 10 days across the world in land.

“If we loosen these mitigation strategies with increasing communicable variants, we could be in a much more difficult place,” Walensky said. “Now is the time not to let go of our watch. Now is the time to double up.”

Health officials are urging Americans to tighten and double the masks, which offers significant protection against the transmission of viruses. Recent studies by the CDC suggest that firmly worn surgical masks or doubling up with a surgical and cloth mask reduce the risk of transmission by up to 96%.

“We need to get our communities back to normal functioning before we can think about abandoning our mitigation strategies,” said Walensky.

Biden celebrates third Parkland anniversary with a robust vow to finish the gun violence epidemic

President Biden celebrated the third anniversary of the Parkland shooting with a strong crackdown on the gun violence epidemic.

The president told PoliticusUSA in a White House statement:

Three years ago today, a lone gunman killed 14 students and three educators at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. In a matter of seconds, the lives of dozens of families and the lives of an American community were forever changed.

The Parkland families have been spending birthdays and holidays without their loved ones for three years. They missed the experience of sending their kids to college or seeing them on their first job after high school. Like far too many families, they had to bury parts of their souls deep in the ground. How far too many families – and indeed our nation – have they wondered if things would ever be right.

These families are not alone. In big and small cities. In schools and shopping malls. In churches, mosques, synagogues and temples. In cinemas and concert halls. On city street corners never mentioned on the evening news. Across our nation, parents, spouses, children, siblings, and friends have known the pain of losing a loved one to gun violence. And this season of so many casualties, the historic spike in murders across America in the past year, including gun violence disproportionately devastating black and brown people in our cities, has increased the number of free seats at our kitchen tables. As we mourn with the Parkland Church today, we mourn all who lost loved ones to gun violence.

In those three years the Parkland families have taught us all something profound. Time and again, they have shown us how to turn our grief into purpose – march, organize, and build a strong, inclusive, and lasting movement for change.

The Parkland students and so many other young people across the country who witnessed gun violence continue the story of the American journey. It’s a story written by young people of every generation who challenged the prevailing dogma to demand a simple truth: we can do better. And we will.

This administration will not wait for the next mass shootings to heed this call. We will take steps to end our gun violence epidemic and make our schools and communities safer. Today I call on Congress to pass reforms to the Arms Act, including revising all arms sales, banning offensive weapons and high-capacity magazines, and removing immunity from arms manufacturers who knowingly put war weapons on our streets. We owe it to everyone we have lost and everyone who has been left behind to grieve in order to change something. The time to act is now.

Biden’s testimony did not suggest taking away weapons, confiscating weapons, or any other nonsense used by the NRA (the weapons manufacturing lobby) to get Republicans opposed to sensible weapons reforms. At some point in the near future the pandemic will end and it will only be a matter of time before the next terrifying mass shootings take place.

After a week of being distracted by the ghost of the corrupt, failed president of the recent past, Joe Biden reminds America that there is real work to be done and that those who have lost their lives or have lost forever find themselves in shootouts like Parkland will get the change and justice they fought for.

For more discussions on this story, join our Rachel Maddow and MSNBC groups.

Follow and like PoliticusUSA on Facebook

Mr. Easley is the Founder / Executive Editor, White House Press Pool, and a Congressional Correspondent for PoliticusUSA. Jason has a bachelor’s degree in political science. His thesis focused on public order with a specialization in social reform movements.

Awards and professional memberships

Member of the Society of Professional Journalists and the American Political Science Association

Meek Mill and Tekashi 69 get right into a screaming match that nearly bodily modified outdoors of the Atlanta Membership (video)

There wasn’t much love before Valentine’s Day, at least in Atlanta, where Meek Mill and Tekashi 69 got into a heated exchange in the wee hours of the morning that wasn’t full of a physical fight.

While it appeared like the two men happened to meet in the parking lot near the club, Meek now claims Tekashi purposely targeted him to build him up through a physical altercation.

Meek says he ran to his car, presumably with his crew and security, when Tekashi showed up and started yelling at him.

The two rappers and their respective security teams got into a screaming match in which Tekashi 69 accused Meek Mill of collaborating with the cops.

In Meek’s version of the exchange, he claims the government sent Tekashi to “take me out”.

“The government sent him to get me out. I had to spit on him to get him back out. He was really waiting for me outside the club. I thought I was dreaming about WTF,” Meek Mills’ caption read.

From Tekashi’s point of view, he claims he exposed Meek as a false gangsta.

Meek doubled its version of events in a series of tweets.

“Why did he choose meeeee wtf lol,” was one of Meek’s tweets.

“We didn’t meet when I got into my car, he just got out … we almost smoked on that 69 pack, out of love for a viral moment … the Tryna locked something up without a cap lol”, read another.

Shortly after that verbal sparring game, both rappers removed the video evidence from their respective social media accounts, but we captured the exchange before it was deleted:

The two had a history of the shadow, and Meek heavily criticized Tekashi for his collaboration with the government in Tekashi’s federal struggle.

We’re glad things didn’t get physical and while we don’t see these two reconciling like Meek Drake in the future, hopefully they can just ignore each other to keep the peace.

We’ll keep you up to date.

Would you like tea right in your inbox? Hit us at 917-722-8057 or Click here to take part!

Chocolate gross sales are booming this Valentine’s Day as shoppers keep near dwelling

Ferrero Rocher chocolate and hazelnut confectionery in a supermarket.

Alex Tai | SOPA pictures | LightRocket | Getty Images

Reservations aren’t required this Valentine’s Day as the pandemic is making romantic dinners less likely. But chocolate will still be an important part of the celebration as people express their love not only for their romantic partners, but also close family members and friends.

According to the National Confectioner’s Association, 86 percent of Americans plan to buy chocolate or candy for Valentine’s Day this year.

“It will likely look a little different in 2021 than other years, but surely friend appreciation will still be very meaningful this season,” said Phil DeConto, vice president of category management and customer insights at the chocolate manufacturer Ferrero in an interview with CNBC.

According to a survey by the National Retail Federation and Prosper Insights & Analytics, spending is expected to decrease this Valentine’s Day. Consumers spend an average of $ 165 on gifts and celebrations this year. That’s $ 32 less than last year, mostly because people are mostly partying at home.

However, chocolate sales, especially for premium products, have increased. According to DeConto, total chocolate consumption has increased 4.7% in the last 52 weeks, and premium chocolate is double what it was before. The trend continues until Valentine’s Day.

“Premium chocolate could play a role in ensuring normalcy or a disruption in mental health,” Deconto said. Ferrero owns brands like Kinder, Nutella and Butterfinger, but also has premium products like Ferrero’s Golden Gallery.

With these different confectionery brands in its portfolio, Ferrero can appeal to a wide range of consumers during the holidays outside of traditional romantic relationships. For example, parents can surprise children with a new type of box of chocolates, while themed assortment bags are suitable for a Galentine Day celebration with friends. (Galentine Day, usually celebrated on February 13, was popularized by the sitcom Parks & Recreation more than a decade ago, and continues to have a following.)

Ferrero also saw increased demand for its Nutella chocolate hazelnut spread as consumers cook breakfast at home. DeConto said people are buying bigger jars of Nutella and more units.

“People make fewer trips, but when they are out, those trips count and the two possibilities, as we saw, were that the overall size of the basket increased and the size of the unit that people were buying increased.” he said.