Michael Cohen blasts the previous President

Michael Cohen, former attorney for former US President Donald Trump arrives at the New York Courthouse on March 13, 2023 in New York City, USA.

Eduardo Munoz | Reuters

Donald Trump’s former personal attorney Michael Cohen testified for three hours Monday before a Manhattan grand jury investigating the former president and will return Wednesday to answer more questions from prosecutors about a hush money payment to a porn star he made arranged for Trump.

“Michael has had a long and productive afternoon,” Cohen’s attorney Lanny Davis told reporters outside Manhattan Criminal Court, NBC News reported.

Davis added that Cohen plans to return Wednesday afternoon to “complete his testimony.” The attorney declined to go into detail about what Cohen told prosecutors.

Before entering the courthouse early Monday, Cohen told reporters his “goal is to tell the truth” and not to engage in “revenge” against Trump.

“This is all about accountability. He must be held accountable for his dirty deeds,” Cohen said.

Cohen, who served as Trump’s attorney for years, paid porn star Stormy Daniels $130,000 just before the 2016 presidential election to conceal an alleged sexual tryst with Trump.

The Trump Organization later reimbursed him but classified the payout as legal costs. False characterization is now the focus of the criminal investigation into the former president.

CNBC Policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

  • Australia gets nuclear-powered submarines under deal with US and UK
  • Former Trump attorney Michael Cohen testifies before the grand jury and beats up the ex-president
  • GOP presidential candidates blame Silicon Valley bank collapse
  • “That’s how capitalism works,” Biden says of SVB, investors in Signature Bank who have lost money at failed banks
  • DeSanti’s memoir sales in the first week far outpace the books by Trump, Pence, Clinton and Obama
  • North Carolina lawmakers step in to defend abortion pill restrictions if FDA’s power is tested
  • House Conservatives are releasing a new list of demands that could upend the debt ceiling talks
  • House of Representatives votes unanimously to release intelligence information on the origins of the Covid pandemic
  • Judge in Trump rape libel case admits Access Hollywood tape into evidence
  • Gulf cartel apologizes after Americans are kidnapped and killed in Mexico
  • Mitch McConnell suffered a concussion after a fall and will remain in hospital “a couple of days,” his office says
  • Senate confirms Daniel Werfel as IRS commissioner in bipartisan vote
  • California will not renew a $54 million deal with Walgreens over abortion pill policy
  • House Republicans are targeting the CFPB while the agency targets “junk fees.”
  • The Biden budget would cut the deficit by $3 trillion over the next decade, with a 25% minimum tax on the wealthiest Americans
  • The Biden budget would cap monthly insulin prices for people with private insurance at $35
  • Senate confirms Daniel Werfel as IRS commissioner in bipartisan vote
  • US spymasters testify before House Intelligence Committee on global threats
  • House Democrats are fighting back against the GOP bill to scrap the IRS and introduce a national sales tax
  • US intelligence chiefs warn that Putin is becoming increasingly dependent on nuclear weapons as the war in Ukraine drags on
  • The Oklahoma Republican tells the Teamsters president to shut up in a terse exchange at the Senate hearing
  • Russia has tried to sway US elections in 2022 and will do so again, says the country’s top intelligence agency

Cohen later pleaded guilty in Manhattan federal court to multiple felonies, including one related to the Daniels payoff. He has been an outspoken critic of Trump ever since.

Trump declined an offer to testify before the grand jury investigating him, his attorney said Monday.

Such an offer is common just before prosecutors file charges against those who have extended the chance to testify.

Trump has denied having sex with Daniels and condemned the probe into the payout. The investigation is being conducted by the Manhattan Attorney’s Office.

In a post on his social media page over the weekend, Trump said the late former Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau would “turn in his grave if told that his office was even considering indicting the 45th… leading Republican contender for the 2024 nomination.”

Trump called the case a “scam” spearheaded by Daniels, Cohen and Daniel’s ex-attorney Michael Avenatti, who is serving a federal sentence for cheating clients.

How Chris Rock celebrated the Oscars 2023 far-off from Hollywood

From the Dolby Theater to Miami, Hollywood’s biggest stars are sure to have had a rocking Sunday night.

One year later Chris Rock served as a presenter at the 2022 Oscars – and was punched by an attendee Will Smith— the comedian decided to stay far away from the awards ceremony venue. Instead, he made an unexpected appearance at a viewing party across the country.

Chris surprised his fellow comedian Whitney Cummings when she hosted a watch party with Vanity Fair and Xeomin at the Four Seasons Hotel in Surfside, Fla. on March 12.

And according to video captured by an attendee, Whitney was completely shocked by the visitor. “What the hell?” She said. “Chris Rock is in the damn building!”

Instead of getting the red carpet ready, Chris kept things casual in a white t-shirt, baseball cap, black pants and a pair of headphones around his neck. As for Whitney, she celebrated Hollywood’s glamorous night at the 305 with a red hot dress.

While it’s unclear how much of the show Chris actually watched at the party, viewers across the country witnessed the host Jimmy Kimmel repeatedly address the now infamous confrontation on stage.

Biden administration is asking Congress to ban household seating charges

Passengers wearing protective masks are seen boarding prior to a JetBlue flight to London at JFK International Airport in the Queens borough of New York, August 11, 2021.

jeenah moon | Reuters

The Biden administration is asking Congress to pass legislation that would ban airlines from charging families traveling with children under 14 to sit together, their latest attempt to crack down on consumer surcharges, the Transportation Department said Monday.

“After reviewing airline seating policies, DOT remains concerned that airline policies do not guarantee adjacent seating for young children traveling with a family member, and that airlines do not guarantee adjacent seating at no additional cost,” Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg wrote in one Letter to Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy.

President Joe Biden has promised to stamp out so-called junk fees in all industries, such as hotels, airlines and banks.

earlier this month, Alaska Airlines, American Airlines And Frontier Airlines said they would include seat guarantees in customer service plans for families whose violations could result in DOT fines. United Airlines Last month it said it would give families traveling with children access to seats, which usually cost extra at the time of booking.

The Biden administration’s bill calls for refunds for passengers who cannot get adjacent seats for children in their group.

The Department of Transportation is working on a rule to guarantee family seating, but said because the “rulemaking process can be lengthy, the President and the DOT are asking Congress to do so without delay.”

How Medicare and Medicaid Fraud Turned a $100 Billion Downside for the US

A nondescript row of offices in a bland building tucked away in a quiet suburb of Miami seemed as good a place as any for a medical supply company to rent office space.

But this company rented two floors above a regional office of the US Department of Health and Human Services Criminal Investigation Department. It also tried to bill Medicare more than $500,000 for various medical devices — like braces, orthotics and wheelchairs — for patients that didn’t exist.

During a routine inspection by HHS’s Office of Inspector General, which investigates Medicare and Medicaid fraud, special agents in Florida noticed that a local business had recently changed hands and had a different address in its building. But this location had no real employees. It was no more than a mailing, a physical location of a shell company designed to make it appear legitimate on paper, said Omar Pérez Aybar, the special agent in charge of Florida.

A closer look at the company’s billing practices revealed what appeared to be Medicare fraud, Pérez Aybar said.

When agents spied on the new owner, he admitted that his name was used in company business records to disguise the identity of the true owners. With investigations ongoing and no arrests made, agents provided few details identifying the operation. But Pérez Aybar said it closed last year before Medicare lost money.

Fraud thrives

That’s just one of thousands of examples of how Medicare fraud is thriving — not just in South Florida, but across the country.

The National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association estimates that taxpayers lose more than $100 billion annually to Medicare and Medicaid fraud.

“That’s probably a conservative figure,” said Pérez Aybar. “If we think about all of Medicare and Medicaid’s businesses, that’s probably a drop in the bucket.”

Omar Pérez Aybar, Special Agent in Charge / Office of the Inspector General

CNBC

The scam runs the gamut: billing for unauthorized Covid tests, fake billing for wheelchairs, braces and other medical devices, genetic testing fraud, home health care billing and a host of other schemes. Investigators say scammers have gotten bolder in recent years – as Washington quickly distributed trillions of dollars in Covid-19 relief funds and other aid in response to the pandemic.

The rise in crime has weighed on the inspector general, who has just 450 agents across the country. The amount at stake is staggering: Medicare spends approximately $901 billion annually to serve its 65 million beneficiaries, while Medicaid spends $734 billion to provide medical care to more than 85 million poor and disabled Americans each year care, according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. which falls under HHS. The inspector general describes the scam as widespread and inventive, according to its annual reports, routinely seducing full-time criminals as well as legitimate doctors and health professionals.

Scamming Medicare is ‘easy’

“It’s just that simple. It’s incredible,” said a Miami man who admitted he made a living stealing from Medicare.

This convicted felon says Medicare and Medicaid fraud is “very easy” to get away with.

CNBC

“You will be surprised. They will do anything for money,” he said, asking not to be identified for fear of retribution from people he had worked with in the criminal underworld. “It has always been like this. And people keep going – they get caught, they get out, and they’re going to do it again.”

According to agents handling his case, he was arrested and charged with running an illegal pill business. The scheme involved several players, all of whom were on the alert and received a share of the good fortune from Medicare’s scam, the special agents said.

Describing the scheme, the scammer said he recruited patients to receive a prescription from a doctor, which was then filled at a pharmacy and paid for by Medicare. He would then remove the label and “wash” the bottle to make it look like new before reselling the pills to a wholesaler, who would sell them back to that pharmacy or to another who was involved in the deal, he said. The same pills could be sold and resold to different fake patients multiple times, billing Medicare each time.

It was a lucrative scheme.

“I had houses, I had cars”

“I was inconspicuous, nobody knew about me. I had everything I had houses, I had cars, I had watches,” he said, adding that he routinely made millions from healthcare fraud for more than a decade.

Eventually, however, someone who knew him was caught and turned him over to law enforcement in exchange for lenient treatment, he said. He eventually pleaded guilty to healthcare-related fraud and served three years in prison.

Even if the scammers are caught, the reward can outweigh the risk.

“I don’t think the government can keep up,” he said. “People keep going. You won’t stop.”

Pérez Aybar said the inspector general was understaffed to handle the endless stream of cases. In fiscal 2021, about 2 cents for every $100 spent by HHS went to oversight and enforcement, according to the Office of the Inspector General.

Fraud is something Medicare and Medicaid take very seriously, Dara Corrigan, assistant administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said in a statement to CNBC.

“We continually work to protect taxpayers’ money and strengthen program integrity in our operations by identifying vulnerabilities in the system,” she said. “CMS uses every tool at our disposal to reduce the risk of fraud and abuse in the Medicare and Medicaid programs and works with law enforcement to identify and investigate fraud and abuse.”

Buried Treasure

In another plan, inspectors general found $2.5 million in cash wrapped in plastic in PVC pipes under the home of Jesus Garces in 2021. He is serving a 12½-year sentence after pleading guilty earlier this year to counts of conspiracy to count in healthcare fraud and wire fraud. Garces ran a fraudulent Medicare business out of a mall, Pérez Aybar said. According to investigators and a copy of the video obtained by CNBC, a government informant recorded Garces with a hidden camera and smiled as he counted cash he stole from Medicare.

Federal agents found millions of dollars in PVC pipes under the home of a man now in prison on Medicare fraud charges.

YOUNG | FBI

“We were shocked to learn that there was so much cash,” Pérez Aybar said. “I think a lot of us hadn’t necessarily seen that much, but it was the way it was packaged, vacuum sealed back in bricks and put in PVC pipes. And it really gave us an indication of how brazen that was [durable medical equipment] cheating is.”

Garces “thought he was a CEO when in reality he was just a crook,” Pérez Aybar said.

Ricardo Carcas, the special agent who oversaw the Garce case, explained how these systems normally work.

“When I show up, I see that it’s the shell that we usually see in this durable medical device scam scheme,” Carcas said, pointing to the storefront at a Miami mall where Garces founded his fraudulent medical device company. “It was pretty empty – it just had a desk (and) a shelf with maybe three braces on it. And it was closed during opening hours.”

To prove it was fraud, Carcas said he identified the referring physicians who allegedly signed patients who billed their medical devices to Medicare. None of the patients saw these doctors.

Whack-a-Mole

“They bought a list of patient information,” Pérez Aybar said. “They have doctors that they either use as part of the program, they pay kickbacks, or they might also buy a list of doctor information and then you start filing the claims. Once the money is in the bank account, they have money launderers and mules who have paid them to go out and just withdraw the money from those accounts.”

Pérez Aybar described the fight against the scammers as “almost like the hit-the-mole game where we hit one and another shows up”.

On the ground, agents fighting healthcare fraud see a never-ending scenario.

Take the Miami Merchandise Mart for example.

The sprawling, aging mall is home to low-cost wholesale retailers, as well as numerous medical supply companies set up to scam the government, according to investigators.

When CNBC visited the mall in December, there were numerous storefronts, mostly empty save for the names of medical supply companies adorning the entrances.

Pérez Aybar described what agents had found in previous investigations at the mall and elsewhere.

“It’s Medicare regulations that you have to have a company, especially in this case for durable medical devices. And stuff like that usually – when we go out I just see a little bit of a shell. It’s an office that’s maybe 12 by 15 feet wide,” he said.

“Maybe there’s a desk, there’s a bit of oddity with one or two different types of braces. They’ll have the manuals that Medicare needs to do it—that they’re familiar with. And usually there’s some sort of divider when we say we’re talking about orthoses, because the patient is supposed to come in and actually be fitted.”

Medicare showcase

Along a corridor in the mall, CNBC found a young woman sitting alone at a desk in a small glass-enclosed store called United Med Supply Market Inc. She said it was a medical supply store and gave us the business card with a phone number for the owner. When a reporter called the number a few minutes later, the woman’s desk rang.

Company President Antonio Lantigua was reached by phone a few weeks later. When asked why the equipment wasn’t visible on site, he said they were storing it in other locations.

“We have devices in other places. We send papers to the company, the company sends devices to the patients,” Lantigua said.

When pressed for more information, he said, “I don’t know why you’re calling me,” and hung up.

Government documents show that United Med Supply Market billed Medicare more than $2 million, mostly for wound care.

After an investigation by the Inspector General, the company was barred from reporting Medicare payments.

Ali Ghraoui, general manager of the Miami Merchandise Mart, told CNBC in a February interview that United Medical had cleared that space and was working to improve the mall’s image.

However, as Pérez Aybar points out, there is always another fraudulent operation ready to cheat the system.

“South Florida is without question ground zero for healthcare fraud, but it is only one state. There are 49 others and territories that have these types of programs,” he said.

Bernie Sanders blasts Trump for inflicting Silicon Valley financial institution to fail

Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) blamed Trump for weakening banking regulation that led to the failure of Silicon Valley Bank.

Senator Sanders said in a statement to PoliticusUSA:

So that we understand each other. The failure of Silicon Valley Bank is a direct result of an absurd 2018 banking deregulation bill signed into law by Donald Trump, which I strongly opposed. Five years ago, the Republican director of the Congressional Budget Office released a report noting that this legislation would “increase the likelihood that a large financial company with assets between $100 billion and $250 billion would fail.”

Unfortunately, that’s exactly what happened. During the debate on the law, I said, “Are our memories so short that we didn’t learn anything from the Wall Street crash of 2008? Didn’t we learn anything from the savings and loans disaster of the early 1990’s, or Wells Fargo’s theft in recent years, or Equifax’s dishonesty, or the accounting fraud at Enron and Arthur Anderson, or the failure of Long-Term Capital Management? the billions of dollars in fines that financial institutions have paid after financial institutions for illegal or fraudulent activity?’ Unfortunately, the Republican Congress and the Trump administration answered all of these questions with a resounding NO.

Now is not the time for US taxpayers to bail out the Silicon Valley bank. If there is a bailout for Silicon Valley Bank, it must be funded 100 percent by Wall Street and big financial institutions. We cannot continue down the path of more socialism for the rich and rugged individualism for everyone else. Let’s have the courage to stand against Wall Street, repeal the disastrous Bank Deregulation Act of 2018, break up too-big banks, and cater to the needs of working families, not the risky bets of vulture capitalists.

Subscribe to our newsletter:

The corporate media seems ready to dance around the fact that Donald Trump has signed off on the watered-down and removed Dodd-Frank regulations of small and medium-sized regional banks. Republican deregulation efforts always have consequences for people at the middle and at the bottom of the US economy.

This time, the executives and shareholders who caused the bank to fail will not be saved. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced that all Silicon Valley bank deposits will be protected so workers at companies that had their money at SVB will be paid, but those at the bank will not persuade the government to fix their mistakes.

Jason is the managing editor. He is also a White House press pool and congressional correspondent for PoliticusUSA. Jason has a bachelor’s degree in political science. His thesis focused on public policy with a specialization in social reform movements.

Awards and professional memberships

Member of the Society of Professional Journalists and the American Political Science Association

California will not renew Walgreens contract over abortion tablet

California will not renew a $54 million contract Walgreens on the drugstore chain’s decision not to sell the abortion pill mifepristone in some states due to legal restrictions.

“California will not stand by as businesses cave in to extremists and shut down critical access to reproductive care and freedom,” Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a statement Wednesday. “California is on track to become the fourth largest economy in the world, and we will use our market power to defend the right to free choice.”

Newsom said Monday that the state is “done” with dealings with Walgreens. California used the contract to buy special prescription drugs for the prison system. The state reviews all of its business contracts with Walgreens.

Walgreens said in a statement Thursday it was “deeply disappointed” by California’s decision, which the company blamed on “false and misleading information.”

“Walgreens is facing the same circumstances as all retail pharmacies and no other retail pharmacy has said they would address this situation differently, so it’s unclear where this contract is moving now,” said Fraser Engerman, a spokesman for the company.

“Our position has always been that once we’re FDA certified, Walgreens plans to distribute mifepristone in every jurisdiction where it’s legal, including the state of California,” Engerman said.

Republican attorneys general in 21 states warned Walgreens in February that selling or distributing the abortion pill in their states would violate local laws.

The drugstore chain told them it would not sell or ship mifepristone in their states.

The Food and Drug Administration in January allowed retail pharmacies like Walgreens to sell mifepristone as long as they are certified under an agency program that oversees how the pill is used and distributed. Walgreens and CVS have announced that they will be certified under this program.

At least 12 states have banned abortion since the Supreme Court ruled in Roe v. Wade lifted. Several other states have stricter restrictions on mifepristone than the FDA.

Walgreens also doesn’t sell the abortion pill in states like Alaska, Kansas and Montana, where abortion is protected as a right under state constitutions.

Alaska requires patients to get birth control pills from a doctor. In Kansas, the state had required patients to receive the abortion pill in person from a doctor, but a state court blocked that law in November. Montana’s requirement that patients see a doctor to get mifepristone is also being temporarily blocked by a court.

The drugstore chain also won’t sell mifepristone in Iowa, where the state Supreme Court overturned state protections for abortions last year.

Join CNBC’s Healthy Returns on March 29, where we’re hosting a virtual gathering of healthcare CEOs, scientists, investors and innovators to reflect on the advances made today to reinvent the future of medicine. We also have an exclusive look at the best investment opportunities in biopharma, healthcare technology and managed care. Learn more and register today: http://bit.ly/3DUNbRo

Sunny Hostin argues Will Smith cannot be mad at Chris Rock jokes

Following Chris Rock’s Selective Outrage special on Netflix, Sunny Hostin chimes in to say that Will Smith has NO room to get upset about any of the comedian’s comments!

Will is reportedly “embarrassed and upset” about the Chris Rock special.

Hostin’s testimony came during Friday’s episode of The View, and the matter was brought up while the co-hosts chatted about recent reports that Will was allegedly hot and worried about Chris’s jokes.

When the comedy special aired, Chris punched Will and also took aim at Jada Pinkett Smith. As a result, reports of Will’s alleged reaction to the special began swirling, including an article in Entertainment Tonight that claimed the actor was “embarrassed and hurt” by Selective Outrage.

Despite this report, we should note that neither Will nor Jada have made any official public comment on the situation.

Sunny Hostin admits speculation: ‘He wasn’t the one who got hit’

Regarding the rumors that Will doesn’t particularly like Chris Rock: Selective Outrage, as well as other speculation about how stroke will be addressed at this year’s Academy Awards, Sunny Hostin says Smith only has to grapple with Chris’ answers.

After Sunny noted that Chris’ jokes “felt less retaliatory and more engaging,” Joy Behar pointed out that Will probably “wasn’t thinking.” [Chris] was easy for him.”

In return, Sunny unapologetically pointed out

“Well, he wasn’t the one who got hit.”

Amid audience applause, Hostin also cheekily noted that Chris ultimately made $40 million from the special, saying, “I think you could beat me for $40 million.”

“I don’t like violence, but I think you could beat me for $40 million.”

In other words, Sunny suggests that Will can’t be upset now that Chris is taking the time to address the slapping matter personally (and earning a pretty penny in the process!).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SE7yMw3rmjc

What do you think of the overall situation and do you agree with Sunny Hostin’s comment?

Oscar field workplace hits are shrinking

Michelle Yeoh in Everything, Everywhere at Once.

Source: imdb

The best picture winner at Sunday’s Oscars may not get a box office hit for taking home the biggest prize of the night.

It’s part of Hollywood’s evolution. The Covid pandemic and the rise of streaming have fundamentally changed the industry. The result was a smaller increase in box office at the time of nominations and a significant increase in demand for streaming.

From late January nominations through Wednesday, this year’s 10 Best Picture nominees brought in $82 million in domestic box office revenue, of which $71 million came from Avatar: The Way of Water. (“The Way of Water” has grossed more than $670 million in North America.)

For comparison, in 2020, the nominees made about $201 million at the domestic box office after being nominated in mid-January, Comscore data shows. The Oscars were awarded on February 9th this year, weeks before Covid was declared a pandemic and the shutdowns began.

“Many of this year’s contenders are from earlier in the release calendar and have therefore been ‘played off’ in terms of their ability to generate Oscar bonus dollars in theaters,” said Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst at Comscore.

In the past, films like 1917, Hidden Figures, and Silver Linings Playbook — which were nominated solely for the award — made 50% or more of their domestic box office gross after receiving a nod, according to data from Comscore. For 2014’s “American Sniper,” 99% of box office sales came after its nomination, a whopping $346 million.

That year, all Best Picture nominees saw less than 13% of the box office receipts after nomination, with one exception. “Women Talking,” one of the smaller films nominated for top honors, generated 77% of its post-nominations earnings, or approximately $3.9 million, according to Comscore data.

“The Oscar boom is not a new phenomenon,” said Brandon Katz, industry strategist at Parrot Analytics. “For decades we have seen contenders pick up additional ticket sales at the box office as soon as picture nominations are announced. But what has changed recently, especially as the Oscars have been a month later than usual in recent years and that they have also been affected by Covid, is a streaming bump.

Parrot Analytics found that the 10 Best Picture nominees experienced an average viewer demand of 21% in the week after receiving the coveted nomination. This demand metric is calculated by looking at consumption, including piracy, social media posts and interactions, social video views, and online research on sites like IMDb and Wikipedia.

Much of that demand likely manifested itself in streaming. Only six of the 10 Best Picture nominees released comparable box office data in the week following the nominations’ release.

The Banshees of Inisherin saw the largest percentage increase between the week before the nominations and the weeks after, with ticket sales soaring 381%. However, that means a jump from $73,000 in box office receipts to $352,000.

This weekend, fellow nominees “Everything Everywhere All at Once,” “The Fabelmans,” “Tar,” “Triangle of Sadness,” and “Women Talking” each generated under $1 million in ticket sales, despite receiving a substantial increase in the number of tickets sold recorded public traffic.

Only “Avatar: The Way of Water,” which saw ticket sales fall 21% over the weekend following the nominations, grossed more than $1 million — with $15.9 million in domestic revenue.

The amazing difference has a lot to do with when these movies were released, how they are available on streaming platforms, and what genres the movies are.

The blockbuster The Way of Water was in its sixth week in theaters and caused a stir at the box office, while Everything Everywhere All at Once has just returned to the big screen after a nearly six-month hiatus.

By the time the nominations were announced, “Everything Everywhere All at Once” had been in the public zeitgeist for almost a year. The film was released in late March 2022.

Movies are now everywhere at once

Traditionally, Oscar-baiting films are released in the last quarter of the year, with most hitting theaters in November and December. Of this year’s nominees, only three made their debuts in the last two months of last year.

Historically, the Oscars have been held in February, so even films released in October might still have been exclusively in theaters if the pandemic hadn’t pushed the event to March.

This year, however, at the time of the nominations in late January, eight of the ten Best Picture nominees were available to stream. But that’s not necessarily a bad thing, Katz said.

“In recent years everyone has said: cinema versus streaming. I never saw it that way,” Katz said. “I don’t necessarily think the data supports that. I actually think these two mediums can be additive and complementary and not opposites.”

Katz noted that some films receive box office gains from being nominated, but the availability of streaming titles can add excitement and momentum in the later part of the voting period.

“Obviously, it’s difficult to make a case with the dollar sign and the box office numbers,” said Wade Payson-Denney, an analyst at Parrot Analytics. “But that’s only part of the equation these days. Streaming plays such a big role.”

All Quiet on the Western Front generated the largest increase in demand, up 59% in the week following its Best Picture nomination. The film ran in theaters for a limited time, just long enough to stir up Oscar competition before crossing over to its homeland Netflix. The fact that the film was only available via streaming is probably the reason for the biggest jump in demand.

This also explains why there are no box office results for the film.

At the other end of the spectrum, the biggest blockbusters of 2022, Avatar: The Way of Water and Top Gun: Maverick, saw demand drop.

The drop in demand for “Maverick” is likely because the film has been public since May and has been available to stream since late December. The Way of Water is still in theaters and won’t be available to stream until later this month. Those who wanted to see these films either had plenty of time to do so or had seen them so recently that they didn’t feel the need to watch them again or steal them.

“Sunday’s telecast will serve as a more than three-hour infomercial showcasing the year’s most notable films and performances,” said Dergarabedian. “This should result in an increased desire from viewers to seek these films at home.”

Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal and CNBC. NBCUniversal distributed “1917” and “The Fablemans”.

CORRECTION: This article has been updated to show that the 2020 nominees earned approximately $201 million at the domestic box office after being nominated in mid-January.

The best revenue-raising taxes in Biden’s proposed price range

U.S. President Joe Biden (C) pauses in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on March 10, 2023 in Washington, DC along with Council of Economic Advisers Chair Cecilia Rouse (L) and National Economic Council Director Lael Brained, comments on the February job report.

Alex Wong | News from Getty Images | Getty Images

President Joe Biden released his 2024 budget on Thursday, which promises to cut the deficit by $3 trillion over the next decade thanks to a spate of new and increased taxes on America’s wealthiest.

The proposal is just the first step in the federal government’s budget process and is unlikely to go into effect in its current form since Congress is now divided with Republicans holding a majority in the House of Representatives.

Many of the proposed taxes are more of a message signal as the president prepares to launch a potential reelection bid and enter the 2024 campaign season.

where does the money come from Here’s a look at the biggest tax revenues listed in the plan.

All sales figures relate to the next decade.

Increase in corporate tax rate to 28%: $1.326 trillion

Biden’s budget calls for an increase in corporate income tax from the current 21% to 28%. The White House argues the increase is still well short of the 35% tax before former President Donald Trump cut the tax in 2017.

Ensuring companies “pay their fair share” has been a priority for Biden since his campaign and will likely be at the heart of his platform if he decides to run again. The president’s economic platform focuses on building the economy “bottom-up and middle,” a direct critique of so-called “trickle-down economics” theories. Increasing taxes on top earners, including large corporations, is central to its implementation.

Collect minimum income tax at 0.01%: $436.61 billion

Biden’s budget includes a minimum tax of 25% for American households worth over $100 million, which would more than triple the 8% tax rate currently paid by the wealthiest 0.01%.

“No billionaire should pay a lower tax rate than a school teacher or a firefighter,” Biden said in a speech Thursday in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, after his budget proposal was released. He said there are currently more than a thousand billionaires in the United States, up from 600 when he took office two years ago. These Americans, the White House argues, should contribute more.

Read more about Biden’s fiscal 2024 budget:

Increase ACA tax on the rich: $344.37 billion

Biden’s budget includes increasing the Affordable Care Act tax from 3.8% to 5% for Americans earning more than $400,000. The increase would go in the direction of strengthening Medicare.

Closing ACA tax loopholes: $305.94 billion

This is another reform that would help shore up Medicare. If enacted, it would close the loophole to ensure the Obamacare tax is always applied to so-called “pass-through” deals by high earners, where income flows into individual returns.

Upper Margin Income Tax Increase: $235.26 billion

Building on the billionaire tax, Biden’s budget calls for raising the top payroll tax rate from 37% to 39.6% if Americans earn more than $400,000 annually and married couples earn more than $450,000 annually. If enacted, the income tax hike would reverse the cuts made by former President Donald Trump in his 2017 tax law.

Quadruple share repurchase tax: $237.91 billion

The new levy of a 1% tax on all share buybacks was passed as part of last year’s inflation mitigation law and went into effect on January 1st. It is projected to take in $74 billion over the next ten years. But the president argues that this doesn’t go far enough to curb share buybacks, proposing in his budget to increase the tax fourfold to 4%. The move, the White House said, would encourage investment in companies themselves, rather than sharing buybacks and dividends.

Home of Representatives votes to launch details about potential lab leak in Wuhan

Security personnel stand guard outside the Wuhan Institute of Virology during the visit of the World Health Organization (WHO) team tasked with investigating the origins of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China’s Hubei province, 3 February 2021 .

Thomas Peter | Reuters

The House of Representatives on Friday voted unanimously to release information about possible links between the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Covid-19 pandemic, sending the bill to President Joe Biden.

The Senate also voted unanimously earlier this month to require Avril Haines, the director of national intelligence, to release such information.

Covid first emerged in Wuhan, China in 2019, although how the virus spread to humans is not yet known. Scientists have been arguing for years whether Covid came from an infected animal that transmitted the virus to humans, or whether the pathogen escaped from a laboratory in Wuhan.

Congressional efforts to release information on the origins of Covid come after the Department of Energy concluded with “low confidence” that the virus most likely escaped from a Wuhan lab as a result of an accident.

The Department of Energy is one of 18 agencies that make up the US Secret Service. The department was previously undecided on how the virus originated.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has also concluded that the pandemic likely started with a lab incident in Wuhan, the agency’s director Christopher Wray told Fox News earlier this month.

“The FBI has held for some time that the origins of the pandemic are most likely a potential laboratory incident in Wuhan,” Wray told Fox News. “You’re talking about a potential leak from a Chinese government-controlled laboratory.”

“I just want to make the comment that it seems to me that the Chinese government has done its best to try to thwart and cover up the work here, the work we are doing, the work of our US government and close foreign partners do. And that’s unfortunate for everyone,” Wray said.

Biden ordered the intelligence community in 2021 to provide an updated analysis of the origins of the pandemic. Intelligence agencies have been divided on how Covid spread among humans, although they said a natural original and a lab leak are both plausible.

Four unnamed authorities in that 2021 report came to a low-confidence assessment that an infected animal transmitted the virus to humans. Intelligence agencies agreed that Covid was not developed as a biological weapon, and most authorities assessed that the virus was not genetically engineered.

CNBC Health & Science

Read CNBC’s latest global health coverage:

The Central Intelligence Agency and another unnamed agency are unsure whether the virus is natural in origin or originated in a lab, according to The Wall Street Journal, which first reported on the Department of Energy’s position.

“Right now, there is no definitive intelligence answer to that question,” Jake Sullivan, the White House national security adviser, told CNN last week. “Some elements of the intelligence community have reached conclusions on one side, others on the other. Some of them have said they just don’t have enough information to be sure.”

Sullivan said Biden specifically requested that Department of Energy national laboratories participate in the intelligence review of the onset of the pandemic. He would neither confirm nor deny reports of the Department of Energy’s assessment that a lab leak was more likely.

dr Anthony Fauci and Dr. Francis Collins, the former heads of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Institutes of Health respectively, have claimed that Covid is most likely transmitted to humans from an infected animal. Such an animal has not been identified three years after the pandemic began.

House Republicans have called on Fauci, Collins and other former and current health officials to testify about the origins of the pandemic.

China has denied the virus escaped from a lab. Foreign Ministry spokesman Mao Ning referred to a World Health Organization report released in March 2021, which said a laboratory origin of the pandemic had been “considered extremely unlikely”.

But the US and 12 other countries slammed the WHO report because the experts who wrote it did not have access to full original data and samples.

On the day the report was published, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said all hypotheses on the origin of the pandemic are on the table and more studies are needed. Tedros called on Beijing to be more transparent last week.

“The WHO continues to urge China to be transparent in sharing data and to carry out the necessary investigations and share the results for this purpose – until then, all hypotheses about the origins of the virus remain on the table,” Tedros said at a press conference in Geneva.

He also urged the US to share any information it has on the origins of the pandemic.

Join us for CNBC’s Healthy Returns on March 29, where we’re hosting a virtual gathering of healthcare CEOs, scientists, investors and innovators to reflect on the advances made today in reinventing the future of medicine. We also have an exclusive look at the best investment opportunities in biopharma, healthcare technology and managed care. Learn more and register today: http://bit.ly/3DUNbRo