Dess Dior “thought Valentine’s Day was over” after the longer term shocked her with an icy diamond ring

Roommates, Dess Dior and Future continue to enjoy their whirlwind romance – and give fans a step-by-step look at their love story via social media. After her last island vacation, Dess showed Dior a brand new diamond ring that Future had just bought her even though Valentine’s Day was over.

The last time we checked, Dess Dior and Future still had their best lives while on vacation. Future has had a blast thanks to jet-skiing with Dess and the couple tackling the popular viral #JunebugChallenege.

Even though Valentine’s Day was almost a week ago, Future apparently still believes in showering Dess with gifts – and she showed off her latest with a post on her Instagram stories. Dess showed off her icy yellow diamond ring and wrote the video titled “I Thought Valentine’s Day was over.”

In the meantime, as we reported earlier, Dess was the one who recently handed out gifts not only for Future but also for his mother. During the last 56th birthday party that Future held for his mother, Dess Dior was right by his side and partying, but she also had a very special present for the birthday child.

Dess surprised Future’s mother with an intricate, painted portrait that was very well received. Not only was his mother grateful for the gift, she was welcomed in as she danced to Dess’ song on her birthday.

These two are clearly strong right now and their fans can’t get enough.

Would you like tea right in your inbox? Visit us at 917-722-8057 or click here to join!

The Biden Covid group informs the press because the winter storm is delaying vaccine deliveries

[The stream is slated to start at 11:45 a.m. ET. Please refresh the page if you do not see a player above at that time.]

President Joe Biden’s Covid-19 Response Team plans to hold a press conference on Friday while a massive winter storm has closed vaccine dispensaries and delayed shipments to the United States

The Chief Medical Officer of the White House, Dr. Anthony Fauci, warned Thursday that the power outages and winter storm in Texas are a “significant” problem for Covid-19 vaccine distribution this week. The Biden government has announced a number of moves in recent weeks to increase vaccine intake, such as shipping cans directly to retail pharmacies and community health centers.

“We just have to make up for it as soon as the weather subsides a bit, the ice melts and we can get the trucks and the people out,” said Fauci during an interview with MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell.

FedEx and UPS package centers in the Midwest were also hit by the storm, delaying vaccine shipments across the country.

The delay comes because the country’s leading health authorities, including Fauci and the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, calling on Americans to contain the spread of the virus so that the US can give vaccines before highly contagious variants make the pandemic worse.

Read CNBC’s live updates for the latest news on the Covid-19 outbreak.

– CNBC’s Berkeley Lovelace Jr. contributed to this report.

Airways’ Newest Problem: Rising Aviation Gasoline Costs

A JetBlue Airways aircraft taxi alongside American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and Alaska Airlines aircraft at Reagan National Airport (DCA) in Arlington, Virginia on Monday, April 6, 2020.

Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Images

The oil rally is taking jet fuel and causing another headache for airlines, which are still suffering from depressed demand for travel amid the Covid pandemic.

According to data from S&P Global Platts, US jet fuel prices hit a nearly 13-month high of $ 1.67 a gallon on Wednesday. This surge was led by an Arctic explosion and winter storms that disrupted oil production, refining, and transportation. Millions have been left in the dark and in the dark in Texas, which largely relies on natural gas for heat and electricity.

“We expected fuel to be at this level in the second half of the year,” said Savanthi Syth, airline analyst for Raymond James. More expensive fuel can make it more difficult for airlines to contain their money consumption, a goal that has already been delayed due to weaker than expected demand.

Cost headwind

Scott Haralson, CFO of Spirit Airlines, cited higher fuel costs as one of the discount airline’s challenges in the first quarter during a February 11 earnings call. The airline expects fuel costs to increase 32% this quarter from the last three months of 2020. Greg Anderson, CFO of Allegiant Air parent Allegiant Travel Co., also cited higher fuel bills as a headwind during a quarterly call on Feb.3.

Jet fuel production, along with work, is one of the airlines’ biggest expenses. Fortunately for the airlines, labor costs are currently backed by billions in federal aid, which helps to mitigate the blow of more expensive fuels, Syth said.

Jet fuel consumption has declined over the past year as airlines have greatly reduced flying amid declining demand for air travel. This has brought prices down sharply and the airlines’ fuel costs. American Airlines, which discontinued fuel hedging in 2014 when oil prices got crater, said in a security filing this week that its $ 3.4 billion fuel bill was only 12% of the cost last year, after a 22% share in 2019 when the price fell and its consumption roughly halved.

“Based on our projected home and regional fuel consumption for 2021, we estimate that increasing the price of aviation fuel by a cent per gallon would increase our annual fuel costs by $ 38 million for 2021,” the company said in the annual filing.

Demand is recovering

According to a Citi report this week, jet fuel consumption in the US this year is nearly a third lower than last year so far.

The supply disruption was enough to drive prices higher, but demand for travel must also recover to keep it up, said Lenny Rodriguez, an analyst at S&P Global Platts. The Transportation Security Administration’s daily airport checks averaged more than 810,000 per day this month, compared to 2.1 million for the same period last year.

This weak demand makes refining jet fuel less attractive compared to other oil products.

“This is the laggard for all oil products,” said Rodriguez.

Apple, Fb, Microsoft battle to exchange smartphone with AR

Tim Cook (left) and Steve Jobs in 2010.

Kimberly White | Getty Images

In 2007, Apple unveiled the iPhone.

Apple didn’t invent the smartphone — companies like Palm and Blackberry had been selling them for years. But the iPhone introduced a totally new way to interact with computers. The always-on internet connectivity, finger-friendly touch screen, and interface based around clickable app icons all seem commonplace now. But at the time, the whole package felt revolutionary.

The smartphone was a seismic shift for the technology industry, creating entirely new business models — apps became $100 billion companies — while replacing everything from digital cameras to in-car GPS systems.

But smartphone sales have dropped two calendar years straight for the first time, according to Gartner. Smartphones are old news.

The tech industry’s next bet is a series of technologies usually called augmented reality (AR) or mixed reality. The vision usually involves some kind of computer worn in front of the user’s eyes.

Users will still be able to see most of the real world in front of them — unlike virtual reality, which completely immerses the user in a computer-generated fantasyland, augmented reality layers computer-generated text and images on top of reality.

Industry watchers and participants think that Apple has a good chance to validate and revolutionize AR like it did with smartphones. Apple has been prototyping headsets for years, and recent reports from The Information and Bloomberg suggest that Apple could release a headset as early as 2022 that could cost as much as $3,000.

But Apple’s not the only company working on these products. All the big tech players — Microsoft, Google, Facebook, and Amazon — are in the game as well.

Futurists and screenwriters have conjured blue-sky visions of what could happen with advanced computer glasses — one episode of the dystopian anthology “Black Mirror” explored a world where people could “block” certain people out of their view. More positive visions imagine having important information coming directly into your view, exactly when you want it.

Today, the most common use cases are much more mundane, including smartphone-based games and apps like Pokemon Go or Apple’s Ruler app, which use the phone’s screen and camera rather than relying on glasses or another set of screens sitting on your face. The few companies who are actively producing AR glasses are mostly focused on work scenarios, like manufacturing and medicine.

“That’s where we now sit in spatial computing’s lifecycle. It’s not the revolutionary platform shift touted circa-2016,” said Mike Boland, technology analyst and founder of ARtillery Intelligence, in a recent report. “It’s not a silver bullet for everything we do in life and work as once hyped. But it will be transformative in narrower ways, and within a targeted set of use cases and verticals.”

Here’s what the biggest companies in tech are doing to try and make augmented reality the next big thing:

Apple

An attendee demonstrates the ARKit, augmented reality tool, on an Apple Inc. iPad Pro during the Apple Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) in San Jose, California, U.S., on Monday, June 5, 2017.

David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Apple’s generation-defining success with the iPhone has made it the company to watch in augmented reality — even though the company has never confirmed it is working on a headset, glasses or any other kind of head-worn computer.

Boland says that if Apple were to release a pair of AR glasses, it could “determine the fate of the AR industry,” given the company’s track record of popularizing new technologies.

A report from Bloomberg last month suggested Apple’s first AR product could be out as early as next year. Its first shot will reportedly a battery-powered headset that’s primarily designed for virtual reality, but with on-board cameras to enable augmented reality as well. The report says this device could cost thousands of dollars and be available only in low volumes — more typical of a test platform for software developers than the mass-market products Apple usually releases.

Eventually Apple could take lessons it learns from the virtual reality headset and apply it to a pair of lightweight AR glasses with transparent displays. But according to Bloomberg, that project still faces additional work on technical issues such as miniaturization and lens technology.

Display technology is another limiting factors for augmented reality. The transparent displays currently on the market have a limited field of view in which they can display graphics, are often not bright enough for daylight use, and generally could be better suited for all-day wear.

Apple’s working on solving this problem, too, according to a report in Nikkei Asia. The newspaper says that Apple is working with TSMC, its primary processor manufacturer, to develop a new kind of augmented reality display that’s printed directly on wafers, or the base layer for chips.

If Apple does eventually reveal a big leap forward in AR display technology — especially if the technology is developed and owned by Apple instead of a supplier — Apple could find itself with multi-year head-start in augmented reality as it did when the iPhone vaulted it to the head of the smartphone industry.

Of course, that’s assuming that there’s software worth using when the headset comes out. But Apple has already laid the groundwork for a rich software library.

In 2017, Apple released software called ARKit, which includes tools for software makers to determine how far away an object or wall is, if the phone is moving, or identify limbs in a human body, among other functions.

Companies like Ikea, Target, and Amazon have already used ARKit, mostly for placing virtual furniture in a room to see if it fits. Warby Parker uses it to enable virtual glasses try-ons through its app. Snap uses new iPhone 3D sensors to improve its face-shifting lenses, which advertisers can purchase. But so far, few ARKit apps have found a wider audience.

Apple is also adding hardware to its iPhones that hint at a headset-based future. High-end iPhones released in 2020 include advanced Lidar sensors embedded in their camera. These sensors can measure how far away objects are, and are currently used to execute fun filters and photo effects. But when paired with an advanced headset, their use could be more profound. Apple is considering using lidar sensors on its headset, according to The Information.

One way to look at Apple’s investment in the technology is to look at the companies it’s bought in the field. It’s bought a company that builds transparent optics, a headset maker, and companies that make software and content for augmented and virtual reality, including Akonia Holographics, Vrvana, Metaio, Emotient, Flyby Media, Spaces, and NextVR.

Google

Google partners with Diane Von Furstenberg to offer fashionable DVF Google Glass.

Source: Google

Google was the first major technology company to release a head-worn computer when it introduced Google Glass in 2013. It cost $1,500 at the time, and was explicitly targeted at people in the computer industry and early adopters, which Google called “explorers.”

Google’s approach was significantly lighter and simpler than what’s come since. Google Glass did not attempt to use advanced processing to integrate computer graphics into the real world. Instead, it was equipped with a camera, and had a little transparent display with relatively low resolution on the right temple. That display was used to project small bits of information into the user’s field of vision — sort of like an Apple Watch or smartwatch on the user’s face.

But Google Glass was also a lightning rod for criticism — it had a built-in video camera, and people who weren’t wearing it felt like they were being watched. One wearer said she was assaulted outside a San Francisco bar in 2014 for wearing the glasses.

Google paused Glass in 2015 and rejiggered it for business users. Last year, it started selling Google Glass for $999 per unit through some of its hardware resellers.

One key application for Glass is Augmedix, which uses the headset’s camera to cut down on the time doctors spend on busywork. The Glass camera streams an interaction with patients to “scribes” hired by the company who write down the important details and enter them into the patient record.

Last year, Google acquired North, a Canadian company making a pair of lightweight $1,000 smartglasses.

Microsoft

Microsoft HoloLens 2

Microsoft

Microsoft announced its augmented reality headset, Hololens, in 2015, and released the first version in 2016. It’s now on its second version, which costs $3,500. It’s a niche device targeted for business sales. (Microsoft’s tagline: “Work smarter with mixed reality.”)

On its website, Microsoft touts manufacturing, retail, and healthcare as primary use cases. In factories, the headset can inform workers about how to fix or operate a complicated machine. Retailers, instead of having costly display items or large amounts of inventory, can virtually display their goods to customers, Microsoft suggests.

Microsoft’s store currently has 343 HoloLens apps. None are household names, and many are simple demos that display graphics like a birthday cake or fireworks.

Microsoft has invested heavily in these kind of technologies, purchasing AltspaceVR, a social network for virtual reality, in 2018. Before it launched Hololens, it paid $150 million for intellectual property from a smartglasses pioneer. It doesn’t break out Hololens sales or revenue.

Facebook

Facebook announced it will begin using Project Aria research glasses to collect video, audio, eye-tracking and location data from public spaces to inform its development of smart glasses.

Facebook

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaks the most in public about his hopes for augmented reality. Last year, he said, “While I expect phones to still be our primary devices through most of this decade, at some point in the 2020s, we will get breakthrough augmented reality glasses that will redefine our relationship with technology.”

Facebook’s enthusiasm for augmented reality is driven in part by its dependence on smartphone platforms from other vendors today. In particular, Facebook has been balking at Apple’s control over the iPhone for years, and the fight has escalated recently as Apple is planning technical changes to the iPhone software that will hurt Facebook’s main moneymaker, mobile advertising.

If Facebook creates the next big platform, then it will set the rules.

Zuckerberg is also predicting massive societal change stemming from augmented reality: “Imagine if you could live anywhere you chose and access any job anywhere else.”

Facebook is already a leader in virtual reality, augmented reality’s cousin. It bought Oculus for $2 billion in 2014, a move that signaled the start of massive investment in these technologies. The latest Oculus headset includes cameras, costs $300, and sold 1 million units in December, according to an estimate from SuperData.

With cameras mounted on the front and powerful processing, virtual reality headsets can approximate augmented reality by displaying a real-time feed of the outside world. This feature is called “passthrough” on recent Oculus headsets, and it could be Apple’s initial approach as well.

The company is also working on lightweight AR glasses and hopes to launch a product this year in partnership with Luxottica, the sunglasses giant, CNBC previously reported.

Facebook is also working on “Project Aria,” which is a research-oriented pair of computer glasses that don’t have advanced AR displays, but can record video, audio, track the user’s eyes, and access location data.

Amazon

Amazon Echo Frames

Todd Haselton | CNBC

Amazon is the tech giant with the least public enthusiasm about augmented reality technology, but it does sell a pair of smart glasses called Echo Frames. These don’t even have a display. Instead, the user interacts entirely through Alexa, Amazon’s voice assistant.

Amazon is also attacking augmented reality different angles. Last fall it released an “Amazon Augmented Reality” app, but it’s not a serious piece of software. Instead, it uses QR codes on Amazon shipping boxes to activate fun mini-games, like turning an Amazon box into a race car, or putting fun sunglasses on a dog.

“Augmented reality is a fun way to reuse your Amazon boxes until you’re ready to drop them in the recycling bin,” according to the app’s description.

Other Amazon applications use augmented reality to place virtual furniture inside the user’s home to make sure it fits before making an online purchase.

But Amazon has many of the pieces to take augmented reality more seriously. It has expertise in computer vision, or the software that can identify what objects in a photo or video are. It has an industry-leading voice assistant that could be deeply integrated with the headset.

Amazon also has hundreds of thousands of warehouse workers that could be early adopters of AR glasses — one commonly pitched use case is to help “pickers” find items in a large warehouse more easily by highlighting them with computer graphics.

Chrissy Teigen talks about honoring Child Jack

Chrissy Teigen shared the special way she holds her late son Jack close to her heart.

Last September, the Cravings writer announced that she and her husband John Legend would have lost her third child in an emotional social media post.

“We’re shocked and in the kind of deep pain you only hear about, the kind of pain we’ve never felt before. We’ve never been able to stop the bleeding and give our baby the fluids he needed, despite being bags and bags of blood transfusions. It just wasn’t enough, “Chrissy shared on Instagram at the time. “We don’t decide on the names of our babies until the last moment after they’re born, just before we leave the hospital. But for some reason we started calling that little guy in my womb, Jack. So he always will.” be Jack for us. “

On February 20, Chrissy, who is also a mother Luna, 4 and miles, 2, went to her Instagram story to show how she remembers Baby Jack. She shared a photo of a stack of bracelets with her three children’s names on it.

SpaceX-Bewertung durch Elon Musks Starship- und Starlink-Projekte

Der SpaceX von Elon Musk hat jetzt einen Wert von 74 Milliarden US-Dollar, nachdem er letzte Woche mehr Kapital aufgenommen hat. Aufgrund der starken Nachfrage nach Aktien glauben viele Investoren, dass die beiden ehrgeizigen Projekte des Unternehmens diese Bewertung noch weiter steigern werden.

Die Bewertung des Unternehmens stieg gegenüber der vorherigen Kapitalerhöhung vor sechs Monaten um 60%. In der letzten Spendenrunde von SpaceX erhielt das Unternehmen innerhalb von nur drei Tagen Angebote von Investoren in Höhe von 6 Milliarden US-Dollar, teilte eine bekannte Quelle CNBC mit. Das Unternehmen akzeptierte 850 Millionen US-Dollar aus diesen Angeboten.

Die Nachfrage der Investoren rührt von den Starship- und Starlink-Projekten her, erklärte Quilty Analytics-Gründer Chris Quilty, die er als “zwei parallel laufende Manhattan-Projekte” bezeichnete. Quilty betreibt eine Boutique-Forschungs- und Investmentfirma mit Schwerpunkt auf dem Bereich Satellitenkommunikation, die er gegründet hat, nachdem er 20 Jahre lang die Berichterstattung von Raymond James über die Raumfahrtindustrie geleitet hatte.

Starship ist die Rakete der nächsten Generation, die Musks Unternehmen entwickelt. Sie ist leistungsstärker als selbst die Saturn V-Raketen, die Astronauten zum Mond transportierten. Starlink ist ein globales Satelliten-Internet-Netzwerk, das aus Tausenden von Satelliten besteht und von SpaceX zunehmend genutzt wird, um Kunden Highspeed-Internet zu bieten.

Top Wall Street- und Branchenanalysten sprachen diese Woche mit CNBC, um die Aufregung um die SpaceX-Programme Starship und Starlink zu erklären.

“Diese Bewertung basiert auf einer Vision dessen, was SpaceX in Zukunft erreichen kann”, sagte Carissa Christensen, CEO von Bryce Space and Technology, gegenüber CNBC. “Ihre Bewertung ist sehr hoch, da der Markt für kommerzielle Markteinführungen in Milliarden von Dollar gemessen wird – nicht in Dutzenden oder Hunderten von Milliarden -, also müssen Sie sich auch an Starlink wenden.”

Elon Musk, CEO von SpaceX, steht an der Basis eines Starship-Raketenprototyps im Werk des Unternehmens in Boca Chica, Texas.

Steve Jurvetson auf flickr

Während Anleger möglicherweise eine scheinbar hohe Bewertung von 74 Milliarden US-Dollar erzielen, hält der Analyst von Ark Invest, Sam Korus, es für möglich, dass SpaceX selbst zu einem Billionen-Dollar-Unternehmen wird.

“Ich kenne ehrlich gesagt kein Unternehmen in der Branche, das sich mit der Innovationsrate von SpaceX bewegt”, sagte Korus gegenüber CNBC.

Wie Starship das Startparadigma ändert

Die Prototypenraketen SN9 (rechts) und SN10 von Starship auf Startrampen in der Entwicklungsanlage des Unternehmens in Boca Chica, Texas.

SpaceX

SpaceX “erschütterte” den globalen Markt mit den niedrigen Kosten und der beispiellosen Startrate seiner Falcon 9-Raketen, erklärte Jefferies-Analyst Greg Konrad. Die Wiederverwendung der Raketen-Booster Falcon 9, die SpaceX 67 Mal gelandet ist, war für SpaceX von entscheidender Bedeutung, da sowohl die Kosten niedrig gehalten als auch schnell gestartet wurden.

Historisch gesehen waren Raketen, die Satelliten und andere große Raumschiffe abfeuerten, entbehrlich – wobei die Booster nach jedem Start im Ozean weggeworfen wurden. Konrad betonte, dass die niedrigeren Kosten für SpaceX-Raketen “neue Möglichkeiten für das geschaffen haben, was Sie starten können und in welchen Märkten”, und andere Unternehmen arbeiten derzeit an der Wiederverwendung von Raketen.

“Neue Wettbewerber wie Blue Origin schaffen dieses gesamte Ökosystem von Trägerraketenanbietern, die das untere Ende des Marktes mit billigeren Lösungen bedienen”, sagte Konrad.

Aber SpaceX möchte mit Starship einen noch größeren Schritt machen. Musk zielt darauf ab, dass Starship vollständig wiederverwendbar ist – nicht nur der Booster, der den unteren Teil der Rakete darstellt -, indem er auf ähnliche Weise wie ein Verkehrsflugzeug landet und neu startet.

Das Raumschiff und sein Booster sind fast 400 Fuß hoch und bieten mehr Fähigkeiten als jede Rakete zuvor, um Musks Ziel zu erreichen, bis zu 110 Tonnen Fracht gleichzeitig zu starten.

“Einige der Möglichkeiten, die wir uns heute nicht unbedingt vorstellen können, weil der Platz auf der Seite der Schwergüter dann viel günstiger wird”, sagte Konrad.

SpaceX hat die Umlaufbahn mit einer Starship-Rakete noch nicht erreicht, baut und testet jedoch schnell Prototypen in seinem Werk in Boca Chica, Texas. Das Unternehmen hat erfolgreich mehrere Starship-Prototypen auf den Markt gebracht und diese nach kurzen Flügen in eine Höhe von etwa 500 Fuß sicher gelandet.

Die beiden jüngsten Höhenflüge explodierten trotz mehrerer Entwicklungsmeilensteine ​​beim Aufprall bei Landeversuchen. SpaceX hat noch nicht bekannt gegeben, wie viel es bisher für das Starship-Programm ausgegeben hat, aber Musk schätzte zuvor, dass die Fertigstellung des Unternehmens voraussichtlich etwa 5 Milliarden US-Dollar kosten wird.

Trotz des explosiven Endes seiner jüngsten Flüge wiederholte der Analyst von Morgan Stanley, Adam Jonas, die Auffassung des Unternehmens, dass jeder Starship-Test einen aufregenden Schritt nach vorne darstellt.

“Finden Sie eine coolere Sache, als zu sehen, wie eine Rakete dieser Größe startet und entweder erfolgreich oder erfolglos landet. Es ist wild”, sagte Jonas. “Es ist wie in der Apollo-Ära ‘richtiges Zeug’.”

Das Raumschiff stellt auch die Abweichung von der Norm dar, eine Rakete “in enger Harmonie” mit den Satelliten zu entwickeln, die es starten will, sagte Christensen.

“Das heißt, Sie werden keinen Satelliten entwickeln, für den es keinen offensichtlichen Starter gibt”, sagte Christensen. “Starship ist wirklich ein bedeutender Schritt über das hinaus, was leicht vorhersehbar ist.”

Während eine Falcon 9-Rakete mit einem Preis von 62 Millionen US-Dollar beworben wird, liegen laut SpaceX die Betriebskosten bei 28 Millionen US-Dollar pro Start. Aber Musk behauptet, dass die vollständige Wiederverwendbarkeit von Starship die Kosten pro Start auf nur 2 Millionen US-Dollar senken und die Kosten für das Erreichen der Erdumlaufbahn “um eine weitere Größenordnung oder sogar noch weiter” senken würde, was eine Reduzierung um das Zehnfache bedeutet.

Der Starship-Prototyp SN9 startet in der Entwicklungsanlage des Unternehmens in Boca Chica, Texas.

SpaceX

SpaceX habe in den letzten Jahren einen Mehrheitsanteil am US-Startmarkt erobert, erklärte Christensen. Falcon 9 habe “ein größeres Stück eines bestehenden Kuchens” genommen.

“Ich denke, die Vision von Starship ist es, das Wachstum dieses Kuchens zu fördern, egal ob es sich um den Bau von Raumfahrzeugen handelt, die größer oder anders gestaltet sind”, sagte Christensen.

Der andere Vorteil der immensen Größe von Starship wäre die Erweiterung der SpaceX-Fähigkeit für Mitfahrgelegenheiten, wenn Raketen zusätzliche Satelliten mit ihrer primären Nutzlast tragen. Starship hätte genug zusätzlichen Platz, “damit die sekundären Nutzlasten für den Start bezahlen können”, sagte Jonas und subventionierte effektiv den Start der firmeneigenen Starlink-Satelliten.

Neben dem Transport von Fracht plant SpaceX, mit Starship Menschen in die Umlaufbahn und sogar an die Oberfläche von Mond und Mars zu befördern.

“Es gibt möglicherweise auch einen Markt im Zusammenhang mit der bemannten Raumfahrt, der historisch gesehen fast ausschließlich von den Staatshaushalten bestimmt wurde”, sagte Christensen. “Es gibt einen kommerziellen Markt für menschlichen Tourismus im Weltraum, und wir sehen gerade die Anfänge davon.”

Während ein Flug in die Umlaufbahn mit der Crew Dragon-Kapsel von SpaceX für vier Passagiere mehr als 200 Millionen US-Dollar kostet, würde Starship “unglaubliche Möglichkeiten eröffnen”, glaubt Korus.

“Weil es wiederverwendbar ist, können Sie sich Reisen um den Mond im Bereich von 100.000 US-Dollar vorstellen”, sagte Korus.

Warum Investoren von Starlink begeistert sind

Der Inhalt des Starlink-Kits für Kunden, zu dem die Satellitenantennenschale, ein Ständer, das Netzteil und ein WLAN-Router gehören.

SpaceX

Jonas stellte eine offene Frage zu SpaceXs Amibition mit Starlink angesichts der Art und Weise, wie Musks Tesla den Automobil- und Batteriesektor gestört hat.

“Wird Elon mit der Telekommunikation tun, was er mit Autos und Batterien gemacht hat?” Fragte Jonas.

Es wird erwartet, dass die Entwicklung von Starlink noch teurer ist als die von Starship. Zuvor war SpaceX führend in der Entwicklung des Satellitennetzwerks und der Verbraucherdienste und wird 10 Milliarden US-Dollar oder mehr kosten.

SpaceX hat bis heute mehr als 1.000 Starlink-Satelliten gestartet. Das Unternehmen plant, bis 2024 4.425 Satelliten im Orbit einzusetzen, um Kunden auf der ganzen Welt zu bedienen.

Das Unternehmen begann im Oktober damit, Kunden in den USA, Kanada und Großbritannien einen frühen Starlink-Service über eine öffentliche Beta anzubieten. Vor kurzem wurde auch der Umfang dieser öffentlichen Beta erweitert, sodass potenzielle Benutzer den Starlink-Service für 99 US-Dollar vorbestellen können.

Trotz der hohen Investitionen, die für den Bau von Starlink erforderlich sind, wird der Bau von Starlink nach Schätzungen der Unternehmensleitung mindestens 10 Milliarden US-Dollar kosten, das Netzwerk könnte jedoch bis zu 30 Milliarden US-Dollar pro Jahr einbringen – oder mehr als das Zehnfache des Jahresumsatzes seines bestehenden Netzwerks Raketengeschäft. Satellitenkommunikation ist eine der bedeutendsten Einnahmequellen in der Raumfahrtindustrie.

“Es gibt bereits einen etablierten Markt … also versucht Starlink, in diesen Markt einzutreten”, sagte Christensen. “Aber es ist immer noch eine unbewiesene Frage, ob Starlink erfolgreich sein kann, obwohl dies ein großer Teil der Bewertung von SpaceX ist.”

60 Starlink-Satelliten werden nach der 17. Mission des Unternehmens in die Umlaufbahn gebracht.

SpaceX

Musk ist sich des Risikos bewusst, das SpaceX mit Starlink eingeht, und hat im vergangenen Jahr mehrmals festgestellt, dass jedes frühere Breitband-Satellitennetz mit niedriger Erdumlaufbahn bankrott gegangen ist.

“SpaceX muss im nächsten Jahr eine tiefe Kluft des negativen Cashflows überwinden, um Starlink finanziell rentabel zu machen”, sagte Musk Anfang dieses Monats in einem Tweet.

Quilty schätzt, dass Starlink eine Million oder mehr Benutzer pro Jahr anmelden muss, “um die Größenvorteile zu erzielen, die erforderlich sind, um die Kosten zu senken, die wirtschaftlich machbar werden”.

“Es geht nur um Lautstärke”, sagte Quilty. “Was Starlink zum Teil vorhat, ist die Tatsache, dass Elon eine Geldbeschaffungsmaschine ist.”

Die Analysten sind sich jedoch einig, dass Starlink die Möglichkeit hat, ein Vielfaches des Umsatzes des Raketengeschäfts von SpaceX zu erzielen. Christensen stellte fest, dass die Telekommunikation weltweit ein Markt mit mehreren Billionen Dollar und eine wachsende Nachfrage nach mobilem Internetzugang ist. Es ist auch “den Anlegern vertrauter”, sagte Christensen, “also gibt es dort ein gewisses Maß an Attraktivität und ist klarer verständlich.”

Ark Invest nannte das Satelliten-Internet 2021 eine seiner “großen Ideen” für Investoren. Korus schätzt, dass Starlink allein in den USA einen adressierbaren Markt von 10 Milliarden US-Dollar pro Jahr und weltweit 40 Milliarden US-Dollar pro Jahr hat.

“Das ist auf Haushaltsbasis und das steigt noch weiter, wenn Sie über Unternehmen sprechen, und wir haben gehört, dass Regierungen sehr hungrig nach den Fähigkeiten von Starlink sind”, sagte Korus.

Der Raumfahrtmarkt

SpaceX-Gründer Elon Musk zeigt dem Publikum, nachdem er von US-Präsident Donald Trump im Fahrzeugmontagegebäude der NASA nach dem erfolgreichen Start einer Falcon 9-Rakete mit dem Raumschiff Crew Dragon von Pad 39A im Kennedy Space Center anerkannt wurde

Paul Hennessy | SOPA-Bilder | Getty Images

Jefferies ‘Konrad betonte auch, dass es eine begrenzte Anzahl von reinen Spielraumunternehmen gibt, mit denen Investoren auf den öffentlichen Märkten handeln können. Dies habe “einen höheren Appetit der Anleger auf Unternehmen mit einem höheren Wachstumsprozentsatz geschaffen”.

“Es besteht ein unstillbarer Appetit, in weltraumbezogene Unternehmen zu investieren, und im Verhältnis zu dem, was Raumfahrt sein könnte, ist dies ein relativ unerschlossener Markt”, sagte Konrad.

Die Weltraumwirtschaft ist stetig gewachsen und wird derzeit auf einen Wert von mehr als 423 Milliarden US-Dollar geschätzt. Mehrere Wall Street-Unternehmen gehen jedoch davon aus, dass der Markt bis Ende des Jahrzehnts mehr als 1 Billion US-Dollar betragen wird.

Jonas betonte auch die begrenzte Anzahl von Investitionsoptionen als Katalysator für SpaceX. Das Unternehmen hat eine beherrschende Stellung in der Branche, und laut Jonas können Starship und Starlink “eine Reihe von Märkten berühren, die das größte TAM sein könnten [Total Addressable Market] in der Welt oder unter den größten TAMs der Welt. “

Insgesamt glaubt Christensen, dass Musk einer Branche, die jahrzehntelang von verteidigungsorientierten Regierungsunternehmen dominiert wurde, eine “Silicon Valley-Denkweise” verliehen hat.

“Die gleichzeitige Übernahme mehrerer außergewöhnlich ehrgeiziger Projekte ist sehr gut auf die Unternehmensidentität abgestimmt, nicht nur eine Branche, sondern wohl auch die Welt zu verändern”, sagte Christensen.

Abonnieren Sie CNBC PRO für exklusive Einblicke und Analysen sowie Live-Business-Day-Programme aus der ganzen Welt.

Mutual care modeled by authorities leaders

In a recent city hall held in Wisconsin, President Joe Biden saw a sharp change in direction for American political culture and told his audience, “For four years, everything on the news has been Trump. For the next four years, I want to make sure all news is the American people. “

In other words, we have endured a figure in the White House for the past four years who not only insisted on being the center of attention, but insisted that the nation’s energies and resources be focused around him To take care of. He abused his office in a selfish manner for personal gain and political gain. and those who worked for him, as well as the Republicans of Congress, walked around him on eggshells, always expecting to calm his fragile ego and ease his hurt feelings when he routinely caused childish tantrums.

Trump’s presidency was all about Trump at the expense of the American people, whose interests as a whole weren’t even on Trump’s radar.

He never did the typical mandatory spin after his 2016 election to declare that he would represent and work for all Americans, whether or not they voted for him.

And it was clear that he didn’t want to represent all Americans. Rather, the president’s power was his tool to punish his political enemies, defined as anyone who did not vote for him or unanimously agree with him.

Its tax policy was written to punish blue states. When the COVID-19 pandemic hit the nation, Trump’s failure to respond was based on his belief that the virus would primarily affect blue states, as he scrapped testing plans as the virus passed through states like New Jersey and New York.

And Trump didn’t even really represent or even serve the interests of his most ardent supporters. Just ask the many Capitol rioters who Trump has turned his back on because of criminal charges and jail terms.

To put the focus on the American people in national political culture is a big change, an incredibly meaningful shift in our attention and a realignment of our energies.

I believe that Biden will use the nation’s resources, energies, and attention for the welfare and interests of the entire American people in emphasizing the importance of unity.

It is important that we are clear about what Biden means by unity.

I hear many Americans claim that they have no interest in uniting with white supremacists, right-wing extremists, or even gardening republicans, who often seem complicit with racist thinking and tend to favor policies that bring prosperity to them Lace distributed, and so on. Serve the richest few over the many who work to actually produce the nation’s wealth.

We hear Republicans claim that Biden’s “left agenda” is not united. When Biden lifted the ban on transgender people from serving in the military, Republican Senator John Cornyn tweeted, “Another” unified “move by the new administration?” – as if unity meant jeopardizing the human and civil rights of the people in order to recognize an ideology or even to bridge it. (71% of American adults supported Biden’s policies.)

For Biden, unity does not mean political or ideological unity; it does not mean reaching a political compromise or an agreement.

Unity for Biden is really about serving the American people – all, regardless of political issues – and modeling an ethos of caring for one another.

It doesn’t mean compromising with those who believe the COVID-19 pandemic is a hoax. It means protecting the health and well-being of all Americans, whether they believe the virus is real or not.

It doesn’t mean compromising with Americans, whether Republicans or others who don’t believe Americans are in need or who are suddenly worried about the nation’s deficit and debt. It means passing laws so that Americans can meet their basic needs in emergency situations so that small businesses can survive and the economy doesn’t collapse completely.

Unity is about caring for one another. And when the American people don’t practice it, Biden is trying to make sure the federal government does what we haven’t even seen remotely in the past four years.

While Biden spoke in Wisconsin about refocusing government energies on the people, Texans suffering from a breakdown in their energy systems due to a frost experienced a betrayal, a task by their Republican leaders.

Republican Senator Ted Cruz notoriously left the country for a luxury hotel in warmer areas because his house was too cold and millions of Texans had spent days without heat, electricity, or water.

It wasn’t his concern or concern. Little government forever! Let’s keep the government out of our lives!

Former Trump Secretary of Energy and Texas Governor Rick Perry was blatant on this dismissal of mutual welfare and the government itself, saying “Texans would be without power for more than three days to keep the federal government out of its business.”

Maybe he should do a poll of freezing Texans.

The Texas fiasco was the failure of the government to serve the rich rather than the people at large. It is the result of the rejection of the federal government and the services it offers to help the people.

El Paso, for example, didn’t suffer as much as the rest of Texas because they relied on a power grid that crossed state lines and connected to fourteen other states. It is subject to federal regulations. In addition, when the adverse weather hit El Paso, the city could rely on the other states for energy.

And El Paso learned its lesson after a 2011 storm turned off its grille. They dedicated the resources to wintering to serve the people. The rest of Texas, which purposely kept its nets within state lines to avoid regulation, didn’t. To avoid regulations, they didn’t invest in wintering and could also run out of energy so companies could demand more and benefit from people.

Texas outside of El Paso displayed an ethos in search of disunity and separation from the federal government that was the opposite of mutual caring. The people suffered a lot.

It is not difficult to see that working together as a nation, which does not mean agreeing politically but recognizing the needs of the people, can better serve us all.

In a small sentence, Biden made a big point. Let us serve people, not presidents or politics.

Tim Libretti is a professor of American literature and culture at a state university in Chicago. A longtime progressive voice, he has published numerous academic and journalistic articles on culture, class, race, gender, and politics, for which he has received awards from the Working Class Studies Association, the International Labor Communications Association, and the National Federation of Press Women and the Illinois Woman’s Press Association.

20 Black film administrators who modified Hollywood within the final century

(L to R) Ava Duvernay, Spike Lee, Jordan Peele

Getty Images

The films that launched the entertainment industry around the turn of the 20th century were created for white audiences by white filmmakers.

It took decades for Black directors to break into the industry and alter how Hollywood operated behind and in front of the camera and how it viewed Black content. Oscar Micheaux led the charge, launching his own studio in 1919. 

Directors such as Melvin van Peebles and Gordon Parks put Black narratives at the forefront of their storytelling in the 1970s, creating a subgenre known as “blaxploitation.” These films used Black stereotypes about poverty and drug abuse to put Black actors at the center of the action.  

Then in the ’80s and ’90s, Spike Lee and John Singleton used their films to examine urban and racial tensions, providing a mainstream audience with more nuanced Black characters. 

“I’ve been blessed with the opportunity to express the views of black people who otherwise don’t have access to power and the media,” Lee wrote in a companion novel to “Do the Right Thing” published in 1989. “I have to take advantage of that while I’m still bankable.”

During that time, Black female filmmakers were making strides. Kathleen Collins’ work in the ’80s paved the way for Julie Dash to become the first Black woman to have a film get a wide release in 1991.

Each of these directors helped push back barriers and inspire a new generation of Black filmmakers such as Ava DuVernay, Tyler Perry and Barry Jenkins, who have been recognized not only critically for their work but commercially at the global box office.

While Black filmmakers are more prevalent and celebrated in Hollywood in the 21st century, there’s still a lot of work to be done. 

2020 was a banner year for Black ensemble films. “One Night in Miami,” “Da 5 Bloods,” “Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom” and “Judas and the Black Messiah” stunned critics. However, none of these films was nominated for best picture or best screenplay at the Golden Globes. The Academy Awards will make its nominations in March.

Here’s a look at 20 Black directors who have changed Hollywood:

Oscar Micheaux

Hailed as the first major Black filmmaker, Oscar Micheaux directed and produced 42 feature films between 1919 and 1948. 

He was a writer-turned-filmmaker, using his first novel “The Homesteader” to launch his career in the film industry. During that time, Micheaux’s content was classified as “race film,” a genre of movies made during the Jim Crow era that were created for and by Black people.

Many of his films featured all-Black casts and his characters were not stereotypical, unlike the blackface caricatures seen in more mainstream white films. He tackled subjects such as racial violence, rape, economic oppression and discrimination within his work.

He died in 1951 but has posthumously been inducted into the Black Filmmakers Hall of Fame and awarded the Golden Jubilee Special Directorial Award from the Directors Guild of America.

A lobby card for the 1921 silent film ‘The Gunsaulus Mystery,” The poster features Oscar Micheaux who was the writer and director of the film, he is regarded as the first major African-American filmmaker, the film belongs to a genre called race films which were produced for all-black audiences, 1921.

Smith Collection | Gado | Archive Photos | Getty Images

William Greaves

An influential independent documentary filmmaker, William Greaves produced and directed more than 100 films. His films captured social issues as well as key African American figures such as Muhammad Ali and Ida B. Wells. 

In the late 1960’s Greaves garnered attention for his experimental film “Symbiopsychotaxiplasm: Take One.” The avant-garde film chronicles a fictional documentary titled “Over the Cliff,” which is directed by Greaves, who acts in it. The documentary focuses on actors as they prepare to audition for a dramatic piece. Greaves used three sets of camera crews: One documented the audition process and the actors, the second documented the first film crew and the third documented the actors and the two other film crews.

The meta-documentary, as it has come to be called, featured a documentary, a documentary about a documentary and a documentary that documented a documentary about a documentary. 

Greaves, who passed away in 2014, is a member of the Black Filmmakers Hall of Fame and the recipient of a Lifetime Achievement Award from the International Documentary Association.

Director William Greaves speaks at the press conference for the film “Symbiopsychotaxiplasm:Take 2 1/2” at the Tribeca Film Festival April 25, 2005 in New York City.

Bryan Bedder | Getty Images

Gordon Parks

Gordon Parks started his career as a prolific and famed photographer before branching out into filmmaking. He started as a consultant on various Hollywood productions in the ’50s before directing a series of documentaries about Black urban life for National Educational Television.

Parks became Hollywood’s first major Black director, bringing the iconic “Shaft” to theaters in 1971. The film spawned a number of follow-ups and helped spark a subgenre known as blaxploitation. The genre was one in which images of lower-class Blacks being involved with drugs and violence were exploited to make commercially successful films.

While this genre played on Black stereotypes, it also cast Black actors in lead roles, instead of as minor characters or sidekicks.

Director Gordon Parks and actor Richard Roundtree on set of the movie “Shaft’s Big Score!”, circa 1972.

Michael Ochs Archives | Moviepix | Getty Images

Melvin van Peebles

Melvin van Peebles directed more than a dozen films during his career in Hollywood, but he is most well known for the 1971 movie “Sweet Sweetback’s Baadasssss Song,” which he wrote, directed and acted in.

“Sweetback” tells the story of a Black man who is selected as a patsy for a murder by white police officers. The man ends up killing the cops, becomes the target of a massive manhunt and flees to Mexico. It became one of the most successful films of 1971, tallying more than $15 million in box-office sales.

The film proved that a story with a strong African-American lead character could be successful at the box office and helped usher in a new wave of Black cinema.

Actor, director, screenwriter, playwright, novelist and composer Melvin Van Peebles photographed in 1972.

Jack Mitchell | Getty Images

Kathleen Collins

A poet, playwright and filmmaker, Kathleen Collins helped break barriers for female directors in Hollywood. She had two major films: “The Cruz Brothers and Miss Malloy” and “Losing Ground,” which were released in the early ’80s.

Although “Losing Ground” was denied a large-scale exhibition, it was among the first films created by a Black woman that was feature-length and created for popular consumption. Collins helped pave the way for future Black women filmmakers to have their films get national commercial distribution. 

Collins passed away in 1988 from breast cancer. At that time, the bulk of her work was unpublished and left to her daughter. In 2006, Nina Collins began to go through her mother’s archive and have it published, restored and reissued.

Spike Lee

In the mid-’80s Spike Lee emerged in the film industry with “She’s Gotta Have It,” a film about the love life of a contemporary Black woman. Over the next 40 years, Lee would become known for his exploration of race relations, colorism in the Black community and urban crime and poverty. He has released a movie almost every year since 1986.

He was one of the few Black filmmakers making movies for a wide audience during that time and, while his films were not breaking box-office records, they were gaining critical attention.

Lee was nominated for best documentary feature in 1998 for “4 Little Girls” and best original screenplay in 1990 for “Do the Right Thing.” He received an honorary Oscar in 2016 for his directorial accomplishments. In 2019, Lee finally claimed his first Oscar for best adapted screenplay for his work on “BlacKkKlansman.”

His most recent feature was “Da 5 Bloods,” which was released on Netflix last year. The film received a number of key critics’ prizes, including best film from the National Board of Review and one of the top 10 films of the year by the American Film Institute.

Spike Lee

Steve Granitz | WireImage | Getty Images

Marlon Riggs

Marlon Riggs was an American filmmaker, poet and gay rights activist during the ’80s and ’90s. He produced and directed a number of documentary films including “Tongues Untied,” “Ethnic Notions” and “Color Adjustment” prior to his untimely death in 1994 due to complications from AIDS.

Riggs used film to examine past and present representations of race and sexuality in the U.S. One of his most controversial documentaries was “Tongues Untied.” It looked at gay Black male culture during the AIDS crisis and featured a kiss between two Black men, something that hadn’t been portrayed in mainstream media. It was selected by PBS for its “POV” series.

The documentary was partially funded by taxpayer money though the National Endowment for the Arts, leading some conservatives to use it in long-running attempts to defund PBS and the NEA.

Riggs’ work, although controversial, became a lightning rod for the culture war between conservatives and liberals that raged during that time.

Julie Dash

Just three years after the passing of Collins, Julie Dash released “Daughters of the Dust.” It was the first full-length film directed by an African American woman to get a wide theatrical release in the U.S. Dash’s 1991 film was named to the National Film Registry in 2004.

Dash has directed music videos, commercial spots, shorts and episodic television during her career. She was nominated for a Directors Guild Award for “The Rosa Parks Story,” which was released in 2002. 

Renowned filmmaker Julie Dash, who wrote and directed the acclaimed film, ‘Daughters of the Dust’, teaches filmmaking at Howard University.

The Washington Post | The Washington Post | Getty Images

John Singleton

At the age of 24, John Singleton became the youngest person ever to be nominated for best director at the Academy Awards and the first African-American. He was nominated for his film “Boyz n the Hood,” a 1991 coming-of-age drama that also earned Singleton a best original screenplay nod at the Oscars.

Many of Singleton’s films examined urban and racial tensions including “Poetic Justice” and “Higher Learning,” which were released in the ’90s. He also directed the film “2 Fast 2 Furious.”

Prior to his death in 2019, Singleton wrote, directed or executive produced a number of television shows including “Snowfall,” “Rebel,” “Empire” and “Billions.”

View of director John Singleton, wearing sunglasses and beret, while on the set of his movie ‘Poetic Justice’, Los Angeles, CA, 1993.

Anthony Barboza | Archive Photos | Getty Images

F. Gary Gray

F. Gary Gray began his career directing critically acclaimed and award-winning music videos for artists such as Ice Cube, Dr. Dre and Outkast. It wasn’t until the mid-90s that he made his feature film debut.

In the years that followed, Gray released blockbuster hits and award-nominated films including “The Italian Job,” “Law Abiding Citizen,” “Straight Outta Compton” and “The Fate of the Furious.”

Gray has directed 10 films in the last three decades, tallying more than $2.2 billion in ticket sales. He is the first Black director to have a film gross more than $1 billion at the global box office. “The Fate of the Furious” tallied $1.2 billion in 2017.

Honoree F. Gary Gray accepts the Excellence in the Arts Award onstage during BET Presents the American Black Film Festival Honors on February 17, 2017 in Beverly Hills, California. (Photo by Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images)

Alberto E. Rodriguez | Getty Images Entertainment | Getty Images

Antoine Fuqua

Like Gray, Antoine Fuqua got his start in the industry directing music videos. He worked with artists such as Toni Braxton, Coolio, Prince and Stevie Wonder before launching into feature films in 1998.

Fuqua is known for directing action and thriller films and has a consistent track record at the box office. His 2001 film “Training Day” earned actor Denzel Washington an Academy Award.

His films “King Arthur,” “Shooter,” “Olympus Has Fallen,” “The Equalizer” and “Southpaw” have garnered more than $1.3 billion at the global box office. His most recent work was a 2019 documentary called “What’s My Name: Muhammad Ali.”

Executive Producer & Director Antoine Fuqua attends the “What’s My Name | Muhammad Ali” Tribeca Premiere on April 28, 2019 in New York City.

Michael Loccisano | Getty Images Entertainment | Getty Images

Tyler Perry

Tyler Perry built a multimillion-dollar brand by creating content for an audience that was often ignored by Hollywood. While some have derided the filmmaker for amplifying negative or stereotypical images of Black identity, particularly with his Madea films, he continues to showcase A-list and up-and-coming Black talent in his work.

Following the box-office success of his 2005 debut “Diary of a Mad Black Woman,” Perry secured a lucrative first-look deal with Lionsgate until 2014. Perry’s two dozen theatrical releases have garnered more than $1.1 billion globally.

Perry operates one of three major studios in Georgia, where he films his movie and television projects and rents out space to other filmmakers. With his studio, Perry has helped nurture the state’s film industry. He has even partnered with the Georgia Film Academy to place interns from the school on productions.

Tyler Perry accepts People’s Champion Award onstage for the 2020 E! People’s Choice Awards held at the Barker Hangar in Santa Monica, California and on broadcast on Sunday, November 15, 2020.

Christopher Polk/E! Entertainment | NBCUniversal | Getty Images

Tim Story

Tim Story is one of the most commercially successful Black filmmakers. His directorial debut came in 2002 with “Barbershop,” a comedy film that spawned two other films in the franchise.

He also directed 2005’s “Fantastic Four” and its sequel “Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer,” which together amassed more than $600 million at the global box office.

In total, Story’s films, which also include “Think Like a Man,” “Ride Along” and 2019’s “Shaft,” have hauled in more than $1.2 billion worldwide.

Director Tim Story attends the premiere of Showtime’s “White Famous” at The Jeremy Hotel on September 27, 2017 in West Hollywood, California. (Photo by Paul Archuleta/FilmMagic)

Paul Archuleta | FilmMagic | Getty Images

Steve McQueen

No, not the American actor. This Steve McQueen is a British filmmaker known for his Academy Award-winning film “12 Years a Slave.”

Born in London, McQueen spent the ’90s making short films before debuting his first feature-length film “Hunger,” about the 1981 Irish hunger strike, at the Cannes Film Festival in 2008.

In 2011, he released “Shame,” a drama about an executive struggling with sex addiction. Two years later, “12 Years a Slave” garnered him the Oscar for best picture, making him the first Black filmmaker to ever win the award.

He later adapted a British television series called “Widows” into an American-based film and released “Small Axe,” a collection of five films set within London’s West Indian community between the 1960s and 1980s.

For his work, McQueen has received the Turner Prize, the highest award given to a British visual artist. He has also been appointed a Commander of the Order of the British Empire.

Director Steve McQueen attends the red carpet of the movie “Soul” during the 15th Rome Film Festival on October 15, 2020 in Rome, Italy.

Elisabetta Villa | Getty Images

Barry Jenkins

Barry Jenkins directed two short films before debuting “Medicine for Melancholy” in 2008. The film received an Independent Spirit Award nomination for Best First Feature. 

Following an eight-year hiatus from feature filmmaking, Jenkins returned to Hollywood with “Moonlight,” an LGBT-themed independent drama, that went on to win numerous accolades including the Academy Award for best picture. Jenkins became the fourth Black person nominated for best director and the second to win a best picture Oscar. 

His third directorial feature “If Beale Street Could Talk” arrived in 2018 and earned him nominations for best screenplay at the Academy Awards and Golden Globes.

Jenkins was most recently tapped by Disney to direct a second live-action “Lion King” film.

Barry Jenkins accepts Best Director for “If Beale Street Could Talk” onstage during the 2019 Film Independent Spirit Awards on February 23, 2019 in Santa Monica, California. (Photo by Tommaso Boddi/Getty Images)

Tommaso Boddi | Getty Images Entertainment | Getty Images

Dee Rees

A student and mentee of director Spike Lee, Dee Rees graduated from New York University and immediately went to work. She interned on Lee’s “Inside Man” and “When the Levees Broke” in the mid-’00s, using that time to pen a script that would later be developed into her first feature film, 2011’s “Pariah.”

Her third directorial film, “Mudbound,” was nominated for three Academy Awards, including a best screenplay nod for Rees. Rees was the first Black woman nominated for a writing award at the Oscars since Suzanne de Passe in 1973. “Mudbound” also led Rachel Morrison to be the first woman ever nominated for the best cinematography award.

Rees has also written and directed television episodes for series such as “Empire,” “When We Rise” and “Philip K. Dick’s Electric Dreams.”

Dee Rees speaks onstage during the 2020 Sundance Film Festival Awards Night Ceremony at Basin Recreation Field House on February 01, 2020 in Park City, Utah.

Matt Winkelmeyer | Getty Images

Ava DuVernay

Ava DuVernay first made a name for herself in Hollywood with her 2012 film “Middle of Nowhere.” The film earned her the directing award in the U.S. dramatic competition at Sundance. She was the first Black woman to win this award.

Two years later, “Selma” helped DuVernay become the first Black woman to be nominated for a Golden Globe for best director and the first Black female director to be nominated for best picture. In 2017, she was nominated for the Oscar for best documentary feature for her film “13th.”

While her 2018 Disney fantasy film “A Wrinkle in Time” ultimately lost money at the box office and was a flop with critics, it still garnered more than $100 million domestically. DuVernay was the first Black woman to hit that benchmark.

More recently, DuVernay has had a successful run in television. Her Netflix limited series “When They See Us” told the story of the five Harlem teens who were falsely accused of a brutal attack in Central Park. It earned critical acclaim and 16 Emmy nominations. It won the Emmy for outstanding limited series.

Last year, DuVernay was elected to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences board of governors as part of the directors branch.

DuVernay also founded a film collective called Array in 2010. The company is dedicated to amplifying people of color and female directors in the film industry.

Filmmaker Ava Duvernay attends Film at Lincoln Center screening of “When They See Us” at Walter Reade Theater on May 21, 2019 in New York City.

John Lamparski | Getty Images

Ryan Coogler

“Black Panther” director Ryan Coogler has become a household name in less than a decade. In 2013, he gained critical acclaim and attention for his debut film “Fruitvale Station,” which led him to direct “Creed,” a spin-off sequel to the Rocky films.

For his third film, Disney gave him a budget of $200 million to bring the Black superhero Black Panther to the big screen. The film brought in a record-breaking $235 million during its opening weekend and went on to ring up more than $1.3 billion in ticket sales globally. He is the second Black director to have a film top $1 billion worldwide. 

In early February, Disney announced that it had struck a five-year deal with Coogler and his company Proximity Media to create television programming exclusively for Disney. He is already contracted to write and direct a second Black Panther film and will now create a TV series for Disney+ based in the fictional world of Wakanda.

Director Ryan Coogler attends the ‘Black Panther’ BFI preview screening held at BFI Southbank on February 9, 2018 in London, England.

Jeff Spicer | Getty Images

Jordan Peele

For many years, Jordan Peele was identified with the comedy show “Key & Peele,” in which the filmmaker starred alongside fellow comedian Keegan-Michael Key. However, in 2017, Peele delivered an Oscar-winning feature film called “Get Out.”

The film was a horror movie about racism that became a breakout hit and critically acclaimed. It exceeded $100 million in sales domestically within its first three weeks in theaters, making Peele the first Black writer-director to hit that mark with his debut movie.

“Get Out” was nominated for four Oscars, including best picture, best director, best actor and best screenplay. Peele won the award for best screenplay.

Peele’s second film “Us” also received critical and commercial success. He is currently working on his third feature. In the meantime, he has been an active producer of television shows including “Hunters,” “Lovecraft Country” and “The Twilight Zone” as well as films such as “Candyman” and “BlacKkKlansman.”

Writer/Director Jordan Peele attends the ‘Us’ New York Premiere at Museum of Modern Art on March 19, 2019 in New York City.

Roy Rochlin/FilmMagic | Getty Images

Victoria Mahoney

In the last decade, Victoria Mahoney has predominantly worked in television. She has directed episodes of “Queen Sugar,” “Grey’s Anatomy,” “American Crime,” “Lovecraft Country,” “Power” and “You.”

She was also handpicked by J.J. Abrams to direct the second unit of “Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker,” which makes her the first woman to direct a Star Wars film in the franchise’s more than 40-year history.

Director Victoria Mahoney arrives at the taping of “Queen Sugar After-Show” at OWN Oprah Winfrey Network on November 7, 2017 in West Hollywood, California.

Amanda Edwards | WireImage | Getty Images

600 Breezy calls out Tekashi 69 for talking disrespectfully about King Von

600 airy

Rapper Tekashi 69 went live on Instagram today speaking very badly about the late King of. In life, he disregarded Von’s legacy by talking about his death and going up his rap lyrics and mentioning how his friends would be willing to take action if anything resulted in his death. Tekashi dumped alcohol on Von in life, but it wasn’t related to that he actually mocked him. Several rappers disagreed with Tekashi’s actions in the comment section, including 600 airy ones.

600 joined the live and started arguing with Tekashi. They both yelled at each other and you really couldn’t understand what they were saying, but it was clear that 600 were upset that he was talking badly about Von. He even left a comment on the live commentary: “I’ll go to jail when I see you. I am not meek. “Shortly afterwards, the Live 600 shared a video of his Instagram story, in which he continued to call Tekashi. He said,” Anyone who calls me tells me nothing. I’m an adult. This man kept mentioning my dead home. And you stand around and say nothing. I have none of it. He [Tekashi] He’s not a federal councilor, he has security personnel. The money will run out and you went to see me. “

Tekashi stepped into the shadow room, replied to 600 and said, “@LilDurk COUSIN died, Manager Chino died and KING VIN died. Do you think I’m taking them seriously?” This isn’t the first time Tekashi has spoken disrespectfully about Durk or Von. Yesterday he shared a screenshot of a Google search of all of Durk’s deceased friends. He wrote “@lildurk TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT YA GANG MAN They Really Die [crying laughing emojis]”Wrote the rapper.” BACK IN THE BLOOD ??? CAPPPPPPPPPP. “

Would you like updates directly in your text inbox? Visit us at 917-722-8057 or click here to join!

Historic winter storm is delaying supply of Covid vaccines to the US

Snow plow carts clear a street in New York, United States on Thursday, December 17, 2020.

Angus Mordant | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Deliveries of Covid-19 vaccine doses were delayed in several states this week due to historic winter storms across the country, state and federal officials said.

Almost all of the cans that were supposed to arrive in New York state this past weekend have been delayed, Governor Andrew Cuomo said late Thursday.

“Any dose that should have been shipped on Monday was withheld and limited numbers of Pfizer vaccines left shipping facilities on Tuesday and Wednesday,” Cuomo said, adding that the state is working with vendors to “increase the number reduce the deadlines that are required. ” be moved. “

It’s not just New York. Samantha Bequer, a spokeswoman for the Florida Division of Emergency Management, said more than 200,000 cans expected this week had not arrived.

“The state is still expecting full vaccine allocation by week 10,” Bequer said in a statement. “Yesterday, the state was notified that federal deliveries of Moderna vaccines are still being delayed due to severe weather. At this point in time, the state has not been given a new timetable for when expected delayed deliveries will occur.”

Bequer said the state is working with vendors advising them to postpone, but not cancel, vaccine appointments hit by the setbacks.

In Colorado, state officials said earlier this week that a shipment of more than 130,000 cans was delayed due to the storm. They said the storm hit a vaccine distribution center in Tennessee, which has pushed back shipments to several states.

The North Carolina Department of Health said Thursday it had been informed by the federal government of ongoing delays in some deliveries and deliveries this week due to severe weather.

The Virginia Department of Health said Thursday that the expected delivery of more than 106,000 shots will likely be delayed “due to distribution channels in the Midwest and elsewhere that are currently closed”.

Andy Slavitt, the White House’s senior advisor on Covid Response, confirmed Friday that there is now about 6 million doses backlog affecting all 50 states. “Many states” were able to make up for the missed deliveries with existing inventory, he said at a Covid-19 briefing in the White House.

Health officials in California, Louisiana, and Georgia have also confirmed delays in their shipments.

The Georgian Ministry of Health announced earlier this week that Pfizer and Moderna were holding shipments due to the weather, which “severely affected shipments of COVID-19 vaccines to Georgia”.

White House officials have recognized the setbacks. The chief physician Dr. Anthony Fauci warned Thursday that the storm is creating a significant problem for vaccine distribution.

“Well, obviously it’s a problem. It slowed down and stalled in some places,” Fauci told MSNBC. “We just have to make up for it as soon as the weather subsides a bit, the ice melts and we can get the trucks and the people out.”

Slavitt told CNN Thursday evening that officials “will have to work double next week, provided the weather improves”. However, he added that “there has not been a single vaccine that is spoiled”.

“We will keep these vaccines safe and sound, then give them to people and catch up as soon as the weather allows,” he said.