Danaher had a disappointing 2024. Its path to success subsequent 12 months goes by means of Wall Road

A worker uses a machine made by Pall Corp. during a demonstration of the clarification stage of the production of influenza vaccine during a tour at a Sanofi Pasteur vaccine production facility in Swiftwater, Pennsylvania.

Stephen Hilger | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Life sciences firm Danaher has certainly not been an easy stock to own this year. A wave of startups going public on Wall Street would go a long ways toward changing that.

Utah Center college college students studying to assume like Shark Tank founder

Student Team Just Right Clothing from Draper Park Middle School answer judges’ questions about their product.

Clara Jensen @clarajensnpictures

Getting funding from investors for a startup is a major challenge for most founders, including sixth graders from Draper Park Middle School, located in the Draper suburb of Salt Lake City, Utah, who are learning how to turn an idea into a business and pitch potential investors.

“I’m really excited because I think our company has a good shot at winning it,” said sixth grader Laynie Alleman. She and her classmates participated in the “It’s My Business” competition, sponsored by Junior Achievement of Utah and Idaho in partnership with CNBC. The Shark Tank-inspired competition drew coverage from the NBC affiliate KSL-TV. 

This financial education project is part of CNBC’s Cities of Success series, which explores cities that have transformed into business hubs with an entrepreneurial spirit that has attracted capital, companies, and workers.

Alleman’s team had the business idea for “Just Right Clothing Company,” which makes t-shirts with heating and cooling technology for maximum comfort. They competed with two other teams: One, called Wish Wash Pet Brush, designed an all-in-one grooming tool, and the other, 2 Lit 2 Sip, a multi-functional heating and cooling cup. 

The students brainstormed and developed business ideas in their classroom for three months. The competition, the culmination of their semester-long course, took place at JA City, an experiential learning center in Orem, Utah. 

Middle schoolers at Draper Park are required to study entrepreneurship as part of their coursework. Yet, only some schools incorporate financial education for this age group nationwide.

Cities of Success: Full coverage

Utah was the first state to require a personal finance course for high school graduation back in 2004. Two decades later, 26 states require high school students to take a standalone, semester-long personal finance course before they graduate, according to Next Gen Personal Finance. 

“As important as high school financial education is, a lot can happen before students even get there,” said Laura Levine, president and CEO of Jumpstart, a national non-profit coalition advocating to increase financial literacy. “By introducing financial education earlier, we may at least introduce some important financial concepts to those who don’t get it later.” 

“I’m all about dreaming big and achieving our full potential,” said Hallo founder and CEO Joon Beh, a Korean immigrant who created an on-demand language learning platform that has helped over three million students and also works with companies to automate their language assessments. 

Beh was one of three local startup founders who served as coaches for the top teams of 11- and 12-year-olds as they honed their presentations. Then, the teams pitched their ideas to the competition judges: Olympic gold medalist Ashley Caldwell and three of Utah’s top business leaders. The animal-loving judges ultimately picked Wish Wash Pet Brush as the winner.

Student Team Wish Wash Pet Brush from Draper Park Middle School pitches their product to the judges.

Clara Jensen @clarajensnpictures

Minky Couture founder Sandi Hendry, one of the competition judges, said she knows from experience the impact learning about entrepreneurship can have on young students. She was a sixth-grade teacher for 30 years before founding the luxury blanket company in 2009. 

“When I taught sixth grade, we always did a unit on doing a business, because I always had an extreme interest in forming a business and entrepreneurship,” she said.

Hendry said she was amazed at “how inventive, how creative, and how just fabulous these kids can just put together thoughts and ideas. I think this is a great program for them, and they have such bright futures.”

“Middle school is an important time to teach personal finance,” said Levine, who is also a member of the CNBC Global Financial Wellness Advisory Board. Even in states where there is a financial education graduation requirement, if that state, or parts of that state, have high dropout rates, we could be missing a lot of students.”

SIGN UP: Money 101 is an eight-week newsletter series to improve your financial wellness. For the Spanish version, Dinero 101, click here.

Why Amazon, Fb, Ford are spending huge

Republican presidential nominee, former U.S. President Donald Trump arrives to speak during an election night event at the Palm Beach Convention Center on November 06, 2024 in West Palm Beach, Florida.

Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images

Top CEOs and their companies are pledging to donate millions of dollars to President-elect Donald Trump’s inaugural committee, as they seek to get on his good side and make inroads before he takes office.

Some of the planned donations reportedly include $1 million each from Jeff Bezos’ Amazon, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Facebook parent company Meta, led by Mark Zuckerberg. Others include $2 million from Robinhood Markets and $1 million each from both Uber and its CEO, Dara Khosrowshahi.

Ford is reportedly coupling its own $1 million donation with a fleet of vehicles.

Hedge fund manager Ken Griffin also said he plans to give $1 million to the tax-exempt inaugural committee, Bloomberg reported. Other donations from finance leaders are reportedly in the works.

Empowered by a decisive electoral victory, Trump has vowed to revamp U.S. economic policy in a way that could have outsized benefits for a few favored industries, like fossil fuels.

At the same time, he has telegraphed the value, both personal and political, that he places on face-to-face meetings and public praise from chief executives of the world’s largest companies.

“EVERYBODY WANTS TO BE MY FRIEND!!!” Trump wrote Thursday in a post on Truth Social, the social media app run by his own tech company.

Many of those CEOs have already made, or are planning to make, trips to Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s Palm Beach, Florida, resort and de facto transition headquarters, as they seek to gain influence with and access to the incoming administration.

To that end, Trump’s inaugural committee presents a “unique opportunity,” said Brendan Glavin, director of research for the money-in-politics nonprofit OpenSecrets, in an interview.

Inaugural committees, which are appointed by presidents-elect, plan and fund most of the pomp and circumstance that traditionally surrounds the transition of power from one administration to the next.

While the money is ultimately benefiting a recent political candidate, it doesn’t carry the same connotation as a donation to, say, a super PAC, which can fund partisan political activities that risk stoking controversy.

President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump dance at the Freedom Ball on January 20, 2017 in Washington, D.C.

Getty Images

And unlike a direct contribution to a candidate’s campaign, there are no limits on how much an individual — or a corporation or labor group — can give to an inaugural committee.

Moreover, since Trump already won the election, an inaugural contribution carries no risk for a high-profile executive of backing a losing candidate.

“It really is a great opportunity for them to curry favor with the incoming administration,” Glavin said.

While it’s nothing new for corporations and power brokers to shower big money on inaugural committees, experts told CNBC the Trump factor changes the calculus.

“It’s all heightened now,” Glavin said. “None of these people, they don’t want to be Trump’s punching bag for four years.”

Trump’s inaugural committee and his transition team did not respond to requests for comment.

Record hauls

Trump’s 2017 inaugural committee raked in about $107 million, by far the most of any in U.S. history. The previous record had been set in 2009 during the first inauguration of Barack Obama, whose committee raised $53 million.

Trump’s second inauguration is on pace to shatter that record, with pledged contributions already surpassing a $150 million fundraising goal, ABC News reported.

President Joe Biden’s inaugural committee, by comparison, raised nearly $62 million.

“One of the oldest adages in Washington is that if you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu, and the price of admission to have a seat at the table keeps going up,” said Michael Beckel, research director of Issue One, a political reform advocacy group.

The boost in funding for Trump’s second inaugural committee comes in part from tech giants, many of whom largely steered clear of supporting his first inauguration.

Other than GoDaddy.com founder Robert Parsons, who gave $1 million, few other leaders in Big Tech donated to Trump’s 2017 committee.

Trump once openly clashed with some of them, including Zuckerberg and Bezos, who also owns The Washington Post, a frequent target of the president-elect’s ire.

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump reacts as he meets with House Republicans on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., November 13, 2024. 

Brian Snyder | Reuters

Not so this time around. As Trump vows to tear up reams of federal regulations, but also continues to accuse Big Tech of stifling competition, industry leaders could have more riding on their relationship with the White House than ever before.

“I’m actually very optimistic,” Bezos said of a second Trump presidency in a Dec. 4 interview at The New York Times’ DealBook conference. “I’m very hopeful. He seems to have a lot of energy around reducing regulation. And my point of view, if I can help him do that, I’m going to help him. Because we do have too much regulation in this country.”

The comments came in the wake of a scandal at The Washington Post in October, when the paper reported that Bezos decided not to publish its editorial board’s endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris over Trump. Bezos in an op-ed defended the paper’s decision to no longer endorse presidential candidates, but the reversal spurred an exodus of subscribers and prompted numerous staffers to resign in protest.

Read more CNBC politics coverage

Nowhere is Trump’s newfound friendliness with the tech world more pronounced than in his blossoming relationship with Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, who spent more than $250 million helping elect Trump.

Musk, the world’s richest person, has frequently appeared by Trump’s side before and after his election victory, and has reportedly been involved in all aspects of Trump’s transition planning. He and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy have been tapped to lead an advisory group tasked with cutting government costs.

This could put OpenAI’s Altman, who is currently embroiled in a breach-of-contract lawsuit brought by Musk, in an awkward position.

Along with his million-dollar inaugural donation, Altman heaped praise on Trump earlier this month. “President Trump will lead our country into the age of AI, and I am eager to support his efforts to ensure America stays ahead,” he said.

Craig Holman, government affairs lobbyist for the progressive nonprofit Public Citizen, told CNBC that these figures “very much fear that Donald Trump may take retribution against them.”

“So they’re throwing money” at his feet “in order to curry favor,” Holman said.

‘Cesspool’

Attendees partake in the inauguration ceremonies to swear in Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S., January 20, 2017.

Lucas Jackson | Reuters

Four days after the presidential election, Trump announced the formation of the “Trump Vance Inaugural Committee, Inc.,” a 501(c)(4) nonprofit. It is co-chaired by real estate investor Steve Witkoff and former Republican Sen. Kelly Loeffler of Georgia, who is also Trump’s pick to lead the Small Business Administration.

Reince Priebus, who was one of Trump’s White House chiefs of staff during his first term, said in an X post that he has been tapped to serve as the committee’s finance chair.

Priebus also shared a screenshot of an invitation that listed the names of other finance chairs. They include Miriam Adelson, the GOP megadonor who spent $100 million this year on a pro-Trump super PAC, and billionaire Trump donor Diane Hendricks.

Inaugural committees are required to publicly disclose the names of donors who give $200 or more, but those filings aren’t due until 90 days after the inaugural ceremony.

If the committee has a surplus after all the festivities, finding out just how much is left can be a challenge.

Trump’s 2017 inauguration was a smaller affair than Obama’s in 2009, although Trump raised more that twice as much money for his as Obama had. As a result, Trump’s committee was widely expected to have tens of millions of dollars left over after it paid for balls and hotels.

But years after the fact, it was unclear what happened to much of that money.

Federal filings show that roughly a quarter of all the funds raised, $26 million, were paid to a newly created firm that was run by an advisor to first lady Melania Trump.

“We take a look through the history of the financing of inaugurations, and clearly it comes from very large donors, wealthy special interests and corporations, almost all of whom have business pending before the federal government,” said Holman, of Public Citizen.

He added, “This is a real cesspool of buying favors.”

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

Honda shares set for finest day in additional than 16 years on share buyback plan, Nissan deal

A sign marks the location of a Honda dealership in Libertyville, Illinois, on Dec. 18, 2024.

Scott Olson | Getty Images

Shares of Japanese automaker Honda were on track for their best day in 16 years after it announced to buy back up to 1.1 trillion yen ($7 billion) of its shares on Monday amid merger talks with Nissan.

Nissan and Honda said they had begun official negotiations to merge, which could catapult them to the world’s third-largest carmaker by sales.

Honda also announced to buy back 24% of its issued shares by Dec. 23 next year. Its shares were last up 15.51%, and would clock their best day since October 2008, if gains hold. Nissan shares fell over 1%.

The Honda-Nissan deal would focus on sharing knowledge and resources, achieving economies of scale and creating synergies, Honda CEO Toshihiro Mibe said. A holding company will be established as the parent organization for both Honda and Nissan, and will be listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange.

“These two companies, they are operating in the same market, and they have very similar brand images, they have very similar products,” Hakan Dogu, chairman of Alagan Mobility Solutions, told CNBC on Tuesday. 

“The new management has a big challenge to differentiate the product range and also extend the business,” he added. 

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

Honda shares year-to-date

Discussions are set to conclude in June 2025.

Nissan’s strategic partner, Mitsubishi, has been given the opportunity to join the new group and is expected to make a decision by the end of January 2025.

Honda reported 1.382 trillion yen in operating profit for the full year to March 2024, versus Nissan’s 568.7 billion yen. The automakers would have a combined value of nearly $54 billion, with Honda’s market capitalization contributing the greater $43 billion share.

Analysts suggested that the potential merger stems from Nissan’s financial struggles and the restructuring of its long-standing partnership with France’s Renault.

In its latest quarterly report, Nissan announced plans to cut 9,000 jobs and reduce its global production capacity by 20%.

—CNBC’s Jenni Reid contributed to this report.

Blake Vigorous Alleges Justin Baldoni Despatched Her to Weight Loss Specialist

In addition to accusations of sexual harassment during production of the film, Blake, 37, accused Justin, 40, of creating a hostile work environment on set and later participating in a public smear campaign against her. However, Justin has denied any wrongdoing.

“It is shameful that Ms. Lively and her representatives would make such serious and categorically false accusations against Mr. Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios and its representatives,” his attorney, Bryan Freedman, said in a statement to the New York Times. “These claims are completely false, outrageous and intentionally salacious with an intent to publicly hurt and rehash a narrative in the media.”

FDA approves Eli Lilly’s weight reduction drug Zepbound for sleep apnea

An Eli Lilly & Co. Zepbound injection pen arranged in the Brooklyn borough of New York, US, on Thursday, March 28, 2024. 

Shelby Knowles | Bloomberg | Getty Images

The Food and Drug Administration on Friday approved Eli Lilly‘s blockbuster weight loss drug Zepbound for treating patients with the most common sleep-related breathing disorder, expanding its use and possibly its insurance coverage in the U.S.

The weekly injection is now the first drug treatment option cleared for patients with obesity and moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea, or OSA, which refers to breathing interrupted during sleep due to narrowed or blocked airways. Zepbound should be used in combination with a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity, the FDA noted in a release.

An estimated 80 million patients in the U.S. experience the disease, according to Eli Lilly. Roughly 20 million of those people have moderate-to-severe forms of the disease, but 85% of cases go undiagnosed, the company told CNBC earlier this year.

“Too often, OSA is brushed off as ‘just snoring’ — but it’s far more than that,” said Julie Flygare, president and CEO of Project Sleep, a nonprofit advocating for sleep health and sleep disorders, in a release from Eli Lilly. “It’s important to understand OSA symptoms and know that treatments are available, including new options like Zepbound. We hope this will spark more meaningful conversations between patients and health care providers and ultimately lead to better health outcomes.” 

Eli Lilly expects to launch the drug for OSA at the beginning of next year. It is the first approval beyond obesity treatment for Zepbound, which entered the market late last year and is also being tested for several other obesity-related conditions, such as fatty liver disease. Tirzepatide, the active ingredient in Zepbound, has been sold on the U.S. market for longer as the diabetes drug Mounjaro.

The agency’s decision could pave the way for Eli Lilly to gain broader insurance coverage for Zepbound, which, like other weight loss drugs, is not covered by many insurance plans. That includes the federal Medicare program, which only covers obesity drugs if they are approved and prescribed for an added health benefit.

The approval also backs up mounting evidence that there could be further health benefits tied to GLP-1s, a class of weight loss and diabetes treatments that have soared in popularity and slipped into shortages over the past year. Notably, Zepbound’s main rival, the weight loss drug Wegovy from Novo Nordisk, is not approved for OSA.

Zepbound could be a valuable new treatment option for patients with OSA, which can lead to loud snoring and excessive daytime sleepiness, and can contribute to serious complications including stroke and heart failure. Patients with the condition have limited treatment options outside of wearing masks hooked up to cumbersome machines that provide positive airway pressure, or PAP, to allow for normal breathing.

Eli Lilly in April released initial results from the two clinical trials, which showed that Zepbound was more effective than a placebo at reducing the severity of OSA in patients with obesity after a year.

In June, Eli Lilly released additional data from the studies showing that Zepbound helped
resolve OSA in almost half of patients. The first study examined the weekly injection in adults with moderate-to-severe OSA and obesity who were not on PAP therapy. The second tested Zepbound in adults with the same conditions, but those participants were on and planned on continuing PAP therapy.

The data showed that 43% of people in the first study and 51.5% of patients in the second trial who took the highest dose of Zepbound achieved “disease resolution,” according to the company. That compares with 14.9% and 13.6% of patients who took a placebo in the two trials, respectively.

Researchers came to those conclusions by examining an apnea-hypopnea index, or AHI, which records the number of times per hour a person’s breathing shows a restricted or completely blocked airway. The index is used to evaluate the severity of obstructive sleep apnea and the effectiveness of treatments for the condition.

Disease resolution for OSA is defined as a patient having fewer than five AHI events per hour, the company said. It is also defined as a person having five to 14 AHI events per hour and scoring a certain number on a standard survey designed to measure excessive daytime sleepiness, according to Eli Lilly.

Trump And Home GOP’s Promise To Not Minimize Social Safety Is Whole Nonsense

Trump got House Republicans to not use reconciliation to cut Social Security. The problem is that reconciliation can’t legally be used to cut Social Security.

The supposed big get for Trump was a promise from House Republicans that they wouldn’t use reconciliation to cut Social Security in exchange for raising the debt ceiling.

The problem according to Matt Glassman:

A Fig Leaf for the ages if they sign a letter promising not to cut Social Security via a process that is statutorily prohibited from cutting Social Security.

By law, Social Security can’t be changed with reconciliation.

According to the Brookings Institution, “Among other things, the Byrd Rule also says that changes to Social Security benefits or Social Security payroll taxes cannot be considered as part of a reconciliation bill.”

Congratulations to Donald Trump

. He got House Republicans to agree to something that they couldn’t legally do anyway.

Trump may brag about taking Social Security off the table, but all that really means is that healthcare for the poor, children, the disabled, and veterans will be targeted for cuts.

Jason is the managing editor. He is also a White House Press Pool and a Congressional correspondent for PoliticusUSA. Jason has a Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science. His graduate work focused on public policy, with a specialization in social reform movements.

Awards and  Professional Memberships

Member of the Society of Professional Journalists and The American Political Science Association

Jason EasleyLatest posts by Jason Easley (see all)

Nike (NKE) earnings Q2 2025

Customers shop at a Nike store in an outlet mall in Los Angeles, Nov. 8, 2024.

Frederic J. Brown | Afp | Getty Images

Nike’s turnaround will take a bit longer than expected under new CEO Elliott Hill, who outlined his strategy to return the company to growth on Thursday after the retailer blamed deep discounting for declining revenue and profit.

The sneaker giant has been relying on promotions to drive sales, and it plans to return its online business to a full-price model, but first, it will need to aggressively liquidate old inventory through “less profitable channels,” said Hill and finance chief Matt Friend.

“What I’ve seen is traffic in Nike direct, digital and physical, has softened because we lack newness in product and we’re not delivering inspiring stories,” said Hill. “The result is we’ve become far too promotional … Entering the year, our digital platforms were delivering roughly a 50/50 split of full price to promotional sales. The level of markdowns not only impacts our brand, but it also disrupts the overall marketplace and the profitability of our partners.”

As a result, Nike expects gross margins to be down between 3 and 3.5 percentage points during the holiday quarter. It also expects sales to be down low double digits, worse than what analysts surveyed by LSEG had expected.

While expectations were low for Nike’s most recent quarter headed into Thursday’s release, the sneaker giant handily beat Wall Street’s expectations on the top and bottom lines.

Here’s how Nike did in its fiscal second quarter of 2025 compared with what Wall Street was anticipating, based on a survey of analysts by LSEG:

  • Earnings per share: 78 cents vs. 63 cents expected
  • Revenue: $12.35 billion vs. $12.13 billion expected

Nike shares initially spiked following the results but pared gains after Hill delivered his opening remarks on a call with analysts.

Nike’s reported net income for the three-month period ended Nov. 30 fell to $1.16 billion, or 78 cents per share, compared with $1.58 billion, or $1.03 per share, a year earlier.

Sales fell to $12.35 billion, down about 8% from $13.39 billion a year earlier.

Hill, who started with Nike as an intern in the 1980s before leaving the company in 2020, is tasked with turning around the world’s largest sportswear company after it fell behind on innovation, ceded market share to competitors and botched its selling strategy.

“I have an irrational love for this company. I know Nike inside and out, take pride in what the brand stands for and want to see the company succeed,” Hill said in his opening remarks to analysts. “In a moment where our team, brand and business are being challenged, my singular focus is to help get us back on track, to get back to winning.”

Elliott Hill, president and CEO of Nike, Inc.

Courtesy: Nike

During his opening remarks, Hill delivered a resounding rebuke of the strategies that have come to define his predecessor John Donahoe’s tenure as CEO.

He said the company had spent too much of its resources focused on driving online sales, paying for performance marketing and isolating wholesale partners — strategies that he now plans to unwind. He acknowledged that key wholesale partners feel Nike has turned its back on those partnerships and said the company is now working to build back their trust.

“We know our sales teams will have to earn every ‘open to buy’ dollar, but we’re investing to make sure our partners feel supported,” said Hill. “We’ll do more than just sell in our products. We’ll actively support mutually profitable sell-through. Simply put, we will win when our partners win.”

That’s good news for partners such as Foot Locker, JD Sports and Dick’s Sporting Goods, which rely on Nike products to drive sales.

Hill also called out a criticism that has swirled around Nike for the last couple of years: that the company lost sight of what had long defined the brand — athletes and performance — leading it to cede market share to competitors such as Asics, On Running and Hoka.

“We lost our obsession with sport,” said Hill. “The reliance on a handful of sportswear silhouettes is not who we are.”

Hill appeared to be referencing the company’s previous decision under Donahoe to focus growth on three key franchises — Air Force 1s, Dunks and Air Jordan 1s. For years, those lifestyle brands drove sales, but Nike made so many of the shoes that they became commonplace and uncool. As a result, Nike is trying to cut back supply, which it has said will impact sales in the short term, but hopefully not the long term.

Sneaker sales

During the most recent quarter, sales at Nike’s store and online were down 13% while wholesale revenues were down 3%. The steep discounting contributed to a 1 percentage point decline to gross margin, which came in at 43.6%, slightly better than the 43.3% StreetAccount analysts had expected.

Inventory, another area for concern, was flat compared with the prior year at $8 billion. Units were up, but that was offset by lower product input costs and a shift in product mix.

Still, inventories were higher than the company wants them to be, especially given “recent sales trends,” Friend said.

While Nike saw sales down in all four of its geographies, results were better than expected in all regions except for China, which saw sales decline 8% to $1.71 billion, below the $1.75 billion StreetAccount had expected.

In North America, Nike saw sales of $5.18 billion, an 8% decline but ahead of the $5.01 billion Street Account had expected. In Europe, Middle East and Africa, sales were down 7% to $3.30 billion, slightly ahead of the $3.26 billion StreetAccount had expected. And in Asia Pacific and Latin America, sales fell 3% to $1.74 billion, ahead of the $1.62 billion analysts had expected. 

Converse, which Nike acquired in 2003, has also dragged down the company’s overall performance, with sales down 17% during the period to $429 million, far below the $462.6 million that analysts polled by StreetAccount had expected.

Nike’s shift away from Dunks and Air Force 1s as well as its steep discounting has also affected Foot Locker, which missed Wall Street’s estimates on the top and bottom lines in its third-quarter report Dec. 4 in part because of soft demand for Nike products, its CEO Mary Dillon told CNBC at the time. 

Since Hill took the helm just over two months ago, he has scored a few wins. The National Football League announced Dec. 11 that it had renewed its contract with Nike after it briefly courted other bidders. Amid criticism for falling behind on innovation and botching a uniform release for Major League Baseball, the NFL’s decision to renew its contract with Nike through 2038 was a major vote of confidence. 

Now, Nike is the exclusive uniform provider for the NFL, MLB, and the National Basketball Association.

Shares of Nike were down about 27% in 2024 as of Wednesday afternoon, compared with a roughly 27% gain for the S&P 500.

Mortgage demand drops for the primary time in 5 weeks, after rates of interest rise

Jeff Greenberg | Universal Images Group | Getty Images

Mortgage rates moved markedly higher last week, causing overall mortgage demand to drop.

Total application volume fell 0.7% compared with the previous week, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association’s seasonally adjusted index. That was the first decline in five weeks.

The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with conforming loan balances ($766,550 or less) increased to 6.75% from 6.67%, with points remaining unchanged at 0.66 (including the origination fee) for loans with a 20% down payment. That rate was just 8 basis points higher the same week one year ago.

The driver of the drop was refinance demand. It fell 3% for the week but was still 41% higher than the same week one year ago. While mortgage rates aren’t that much lower now than they were a year ago, it may be that refinance volume is so low in general that any slight move makes for a large comparison.

Applications for a mortgage to purchase a home increased 1% for the week and were 6% higher than the same week one year ago.

“Conventional and VA purchase applications drove this week’s increase in purchase activity on a weekly and annual basis. Buyers remained active in the purchase market, helped by gradually improving inventory conditions and a more positive outlook on the economy and job market,” wrote Joel Kan, vice president and deputy chief economist at the MBA.

Mortgage rates have been essentially flat to start this week, according to a separate survey from Mortgage News Daily, as the market awaits the Federal Reserve meeting Wednesday. A rate cut is expected, but some analysts say it may be the last one for awhile.

“Markets know the Fed will cut and that the dot plot (aka rate outlook survey that’s updated 4 times per year and closely watched by bonds) will show a higher rate trajectory than September,” wrote Matthew Graham, chief operating officer at Mortgage News Daily. “What we don’t know is how gloomy of a dot plot or how hawkish of a Powell the market is willing to accept.”

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

Ozempic faces scrutiny over potential eye situation threat

A box of Ozempic made by Novo Nordisk is seen at a pharmacy in London, Britain March 8, 2024.

Hollie Adams | Reuters

A version of this article first appeared in CNBC’s Healthy Returns newsletter, which brings the latest health-care news straight to your inbox. Subscribe here to receive future editions.

There may be a new, unintended side effect linked to Novo Nordisk‘s blockbuster diabetes injection, Ozempic. 

Danish health authorities on Monday said they are asking the European Union’s drug regulator to review the findings of two Danish studies linking Ozempic to an increased risk of a rare vision-threatening eye condition in Type 2 diabetes patients. 

The condition is called non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, or NAION. It is characterized by vision loss due to decreased blood flow to the front part of the optic nerve, which connects the eye to the brain. 

The disease typically occurs without any pain and most commonly affects people ages 50 and above. NAION affects between 2.3 and 10.3 patients per 100,000 people per year in the U.S., according to some estimates. 

The Danish Medicines Agency said it has kept close tabs on NAION as a possible adverse effect of semaglutide, the active ingredient in Ozempic, over the last six months. The agency received 19 reports of the condition in Denmark as of Dec. 10. 

But the overall number of NAION cases in Denmark has increased since Ozempic was introduced in the Danish market in 2018, Jakob Grauslund, professor in eye diseases at the University of Southern Denmark, or SDU, said in a release Monday. Denmark used to see around 60 to 70 cases a year but now has up to 150, added Grauslund, who helped conduct one of the studies. 

It’s the latest potential concern about popular GLP-1s such as Ozempic, which mimic gut hormones to regulate blood sugar and tamp down appetite. Demand for the drug class has soared despite hefty price tags and a handful of unpleasant side effects that are most commonly gastrointestinal, such as nausea and vomiting. 

In a statement Monday, Novo Nordisk said after a “thorough evaluation of the studies” and an internal safety assessment, the Danish drugmaker is “of the opinion that the benefit-risk profile of semaglutide remains unchanged.” The company added that patient safety was a top priority. 

The studies, conducted independently by SDU researchers and other institutions, both found that diabetes patients who used Ozempic were more than twice as likely to be diagnosed with the condition than those who took another diabetes drug. 

The first Danish study was based on data from more than 400,000 diabetes patients, a quarter of whom were treated with Ozempic and the rest with other diabetes drugs. The second study involved data from more than 44,000 Danish diabetes patients who received Ozempic between 2018 and 2024 and nearly 17,000 Norwegian patients who took the drug between 2018 and 2022. 

The studies were posted on medRxiv, a website that posts studies before they’ve been reviewed by outside scientists. Both appear to confirm a link first suggested in a Harvard University study earlier this year. 

Still, the authors of the first SDU study said that the absolute risk of the condition among semaglutide users is low. They added that assuming the risk remains constant over time, the results indicate that a diabetes patient taking Ozempic for 20 years would have a 0.3% to 0.5% chance of developing NAION. 

“Although our findings thereby do not rule out the possibility of an increased risk of NAION when using semaglutide for obesity, the low number of observed events suggests that any potential risk is likely of limited absolute magnitude,” the authors of the first study said. 

They added that additional analyses that are designed differently are needed to further investigate whether Wegovy users, who take semaglutide for obesity, also have an increased risk of the condition.

For now, analysts are less concerned about the risk of NAION and its potential to reduce prescriptions of Ozempic.

“Unless semaglutide is found to be unique among GLP-1s in harboring this risk, prescribing [is] not likely to be affected,” TD Cowen analyst Michael Nedelcovych said in a research note on Monday.

Feel free to send any tips, suggestions, story ideas and data to Annika at annikakim.constantino@nbcuni.com.

Latest in health-care tech: Nearly 80% of physicians using telemedicine are doing so weekly, study finds  

If physicians have their way, telehealth is here to stay. That’s according to a new report from Doximity, which found that 83% of doctors would like telemedicine to remain “a permanent part of their clinical practice.”

Doximity runs a digital platform for medical professionals that has been likened to a LinkedIn for doctors. But users can do more than network and read news on Doximity, as the company also offers telemedicine tools like voice calls and video calls.

Since the company has some stake in the game, Doximity published a report on Tuesday that outlines the state of telemedicine in the U.S. and its role in health-care delivery. It surveyed 1,171 of its physician telemedicine users and 131 of its nurse practitioner telemedicine users in August. 

More than 77% of the doctors surveyed said they are using telehealth weekly, and 35% said they’ve incorporated the technology into their daily clinical practice. Nearly 90% of nurse practitioners said they use telemedicine weekly, and 52% do so daily.

“Strong physician support for telemedicine underscores its increasing role in modern health care, with the potential to transform how care is delivered for years to come,” Doximity said. 

Additionally, around two-thirds of physicians said that telehealth had “improved patient outcomes” in their practices, particularly among neurologists, endocrinologists and rheumatologists. Doximity found that endocrinologists, urologists, gastroenterologists, rheumatologists and neurologists were the top adopters of the technology, respectively. 

The most common use of telemedicine in clinical practice is for follow up visits, as 84% of doctors said they will use the technology to carry out those appointments. Next, 60% of physicians said they use telehealth for medication management, 57% said they use it to discuss lab reports or test results with patients and 52% said they use it to help patients manage chronic disease.  

Half of the doctors surveyed said telemedicine had improved patients’ adherence to treatment plans, up from 37% last year. 

Nearly one-third of physicians said the technology has helped them serve more patients per day, and two-thirds said it has helped them better treat their patients. 

Read the full report from Doximity here.

Feel free to send any tips, suggestions, story ideas and data to Ashley at ashley.capoot@nbcuni.com.