2024 expectations for Wegovy, Ozempic, Zepbound

George Frey | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Weight loss drugs exploded into the public eye this year, and 2024 will bring more change to the evolving market. 

The drugs skyrocketed in popularity in 2023 as they helped patients shed significant weight, despite hefty price tags, mixed insurance coverage and a handful of unpleasant side effects. 

Demand for the drugs is unlikely to slow down in 2024, especially as treatments gradually become more accessible. Much of Wall Street believes the weight loss drug market will only expand, with some analysts projecting that it will be worth $100 billion by the end of the decade. Goldman Sachs analysts expect 15 million U.S. adults to be on obesity medications by 2030.

But next year, investors will be watching how the dominant players in the market, Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly, navigate supply issues plaguing their treatments. Patients have been struggling to get their hands on Novo Nordisk’s weight loss injection Wegovy, its diabetes treatment Ozempic, and Eli Lilly’s diabetes injection Mounjaro.

Analysts expect supply constraints to improve but note that the broader issue will take years to resolve. 

Outside of supply headwinds and the lack of broader insurance coverage for weight loss drugs, Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly have a big year ahead of them. 

Novo Nordisk could win approvals for expanded use of Wegovy in the U.S. and Europe. Eli Lilly’s newly approved weight loss drug, Zepbound, could garner more than a billion dollars in sales in its first year on the market.

Both companies are also expected to release new data that could show other potential health benefits of their drugs beyond weight loss and diabetes management, which may increase insurance coverage down the line. 

Next year may mean even more to the other companies hoping to join what’s so far been a two-horse race to make weight loss treatments.

New drug data from Pfizer and Amgen, and the potential for more buyouts or collaborations between larger companies and smaller makers of obesity drugs, could alter the market’s competitive landscape in the coming months.

Supply issues could ease but won’t go away

The supply problems plaguing Wegovy, Ozempic and Mounjaro are likely “the biggest thing” investors will watch next year, Guggenheim analyst Seamus Fernandez told CNBC. 

Some analysts said supply constraints will likely persist for years, but expect them to ease in 2024 as Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly work to expand manufacturing capacity for their drugs. 

Novo Nordisk during its third-quarter earnings call in November said it is “looking at significantly scaling our supply” of Wegovy in the U.S. in 2024. TD Cowen analyst Michael Nedelcovych told CNBC that the company during the call appeared to suggest that such a change wouldn’t look like a big jump in supply but rather steady improvements over time.

Supply could increase more significantly years from now: Novo Nordisk in November said it would invest $6 billion to expand its manufacturing facilities in Denmark, noting it will finish construction from the end of 2025 through 2029. The company also said it would spend around $2.3 billion to expand another production site in France. 

Top weight loss and diabetes drugs

Wegovy from Novo Nordisk is a weekly weight loss injection for adults with obesity or who are overweight. The drug mimics a hormone produced in the gut called GLP-1 to suppress a person’s appetite.

Zepbound from Eli Lilly is a weekly weight loss injection for adults with obesity or who are overweight. The treatment mimics GLP-1 and another gut hormone called GIP to reduce appetite and food intake.

Ozempic from Novo Nordisk is a weekly injection that helps lower blood sugar levels in adults with Type 2 diabetes. The medication mimics GLP-1 to suppress appetite and help the pancreas make more insulin.

Mounjaro from Eli Lilly is a weekly injection that helps lower blood sugar levels in adults with Type 2 diabetes. The drug mimics GLP-1 and GIP to curb appetite and stimulate insulin production.

Meanwhile, Eli Lilly said during its third-quarter earnings call in November that supply of Mounjaro has improved in the U.S. even as it remains constrained around the globe.

Executives also said that Eli Lilly is on track to achieve its goal of doubling production capacity for drugs such as Mounjaro, in part through investments in new manufacturing sites in North Carolina and Indiana.

But Eli Lilly CEO David Ricks said on the call that the company is “aggressively planning” further production buildup for Mounjaro and other drugs. He added that “it’s a problem we work on every day. So we’re not at all happy with the capacity.”

Zepbound could become a blockbuster 

The FDA approves Eli Lilly’s Zepbound, a weight loss drug similar to Ozempic and Wegovy.

Courtesy: Eli Lilly

Morgan Stanley expects Zepbound to rake in $2.2 billion in sales in 2024, according to a note released after the drug’s approval in November. Meanwhile, Bank of America analysts in a November note projected $2.7 billion in Zepbound revenue in 2024. 

Some analysts expect far more sales growth for Zepbound and Mounjaro beyond 2024. Tirzepatide, the active ingredient in both drugs, has a “very strong shot of being the best-selling molecule of all time in the pharmaceutical industry,” said Guggenheim’s Fernandez. 

Wall Street is enthusiastic about Zepbound in part because it may cause more weight loss than Wegovy. Studies directly comparing the two, including an ongoing trial from Eli Lilly, would need to confirm that.

Results from that trial could come out next year after initial data from separate studies examining Zepbound as a potential treatment for other health conditions, including heart failure.

Mixed insurance coverage will likely weigh on sales of Zepbound and other weight loss drugs in 2024, but Eli Lilly has already secured some coverage for the drug. 

Wegovy could make history again 

Wegovy made history this year when it slashed the risk of serious heart problems by 20% in people with obesity and heart disease in a late-stage trial. In 2024, the drug could shake up the pharmaceutical industry again if U.S. and European regulators decide to approve it for that purpose. 

Those potential approvals, which would make Wegovy the first GLP-1 drug to have an expanded use for heart health, are a “foregone conclusion” for Novo Nordisk, Cantor Fitzgerald’s Louise Chen told CNBC.  

Still life of Wegovy an injectable prescription weight loss medicine that has helped people with obesity. It should be used with a weight loss plan and physical activity. 

Michael Siluk | UCG | Getty Images

An FDA approval could potentially increase the uptake of Wegovy, encouraging more obesity specialists, primary care providers and cardiologists to prescribe it to eligible patients, said Dr. Eduardo Grunvald, medical director for UC San Diego’s Center for Advanced Weight Management.

An approval may also put more pressure on U.S. insurers to eventually cover Wegovy and similar weight loss treatments, opening the door for broader use.

Eli Lilly is also studying the cardiovascular benefits of Zepbound in a phase three clinical trial in diabetes patients with increased cardiovascular risk, and results are expected in late 2024. The drugmaker is conducting a similar study in obese patients with heart-health risks, but results may not come until 2027. 

Meanwhile, Novo Nordisk’s other treatments could reach their own milestones next year.

Novo Nordisk expects to release data in the first half of 2024 from a late-stage trial examining Ozempic as a treatment for kidney failure in diabetes patients with chronic kidney disease. The company hinted that the trial would be a success when it halted the study a year earlier than planned in October based on an interim analysis.

Upcoming clinical trial data releases

  • A phase-three trial from Eli Lilly on Zepbound as a treatment for cardiovascular complications in diabetes.
  • A phase-three trial from Novo Nordisk on Ozempic as a treatment for kidney failure in diabetes patients with chronic kidney disease.
  • A phase-three trial from Novo Nordisk on a 25-milligram version of its once-a-day weight loss pill.
  • A phase-three trial on Zepbound as a potential treatment for heart failure in patients with obesity.
  • A phase-three trial on Zepbound as a potential treatment for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, which is caused by fat buildup in the liver, in patients with obesity.
  • A phase-three trial on Zepbound as a potential treatment for obstructive sleep apnea, or the pause of breathing during sleep due to blocked airways, in patients with obesity.
  • A phase-three trial on IcoSema, a combination of once-weekly insulin and once-weekly semaglutide, in patients with diabetes.

Novo Nordisk will also release phase three clinical trial data on a 25-milligram version of its once-a-day weight loss pill, which uses semaglutide, the same active ingredient as in Ozempic and Wegovy. 

That trial is crucial because Novo Nordisk is waiting to see that data before filing for approval of the oral weight loss drug, said Cowen’s Nedelcovych. He added that in the long term, the availability of weight-loss pills could boost capacity for their injectable counterparts. 

Also in 2024, a study following patients from a previous late-stage trial could potentially generate data supporting Wegovy as a treatment for preventing the development of diabetes, Nedelcovych said.

A make-or-break year for Pfizer

New data next year will be crucial to determining whether Pfizer gets a piece of the weight loss drug space. The stakes are high: CEO Albert Bourla has said the company hopes to capture $10 billion of that market. 

Pfizer axed a twice-daily version of the only obesity product in its pipeline earlier this month after patients taking the pill lost significant weight but had trouble tolerating the drug in a mid-stage study. 

Now, the company is pinning its hopes on a once-a-day version of the pill, known as danuglipron, which it believes may cause fewer adverse side effects. Pfizer said it expects to release more data on that version of the drug in the first half of 2024, which will help the company decide whether to start a late-stage study on the pill. 

CFOTO | Future Publishing | Getty Images

However, some analysts have raised questions about whether the once-a-day version will be easier to tolerate.

“Despite ongoing work, tolerability still appears to be an issue with the product, and it is not clear to us why this will improve” in a phase three trial or with a once-daily version, JPMorgan analyst Chris Schott said in a December note.

Barclays analyst Carter Gould said in a December note that it is “increasingly apparent” that the company will have to look externally for an obesity treatment, whether that’s through an acquisition or partnership, to capture a slice of the weight loss drug market like it had hoped.

Meanwhile, upcoming data will reveal how serious Amgen’s weight loss drug portfolio is. In the first half of 2024, Amgen is slated to publish early stage trial data on an oral weight loss medication.

In the second half of the year, Amgen plans to release mid-stage trial data on an injectable drug that helped cause up to 14.5% weight loss after 12 weeks in an early study.

Watch for buyouts and partnerships

Pfizer isn’t the only company that could benefit from looking externally for obesity drugs. 

Larger drugmakers used acquisitions of smaller businesses, or partnerships with them, to carve out space in the weight loss drug market this year. More companies could deploy the strategy next year, analysts said.

“There are a bunch of other large-cap pharmas on the list who could do this,” said Cantor Fitzgerald’s Chen. 

Swiss company Roche said earlier this month it would buy the privately held U.S. obesity drugmaker Carmot Therapeutics for $2.7 billion. AstraZeneca signed a licensing agreement with Chinese biotech company Eccogene to develop an obesity pill. 

Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly have also snapped up smaller obesity drug companies this year to maintain their dominance in the market. 

Recent weight loss drug buyouts and partnerships

  • Roche in December said it will buy privately held obesity drugmaker Carmot Therapeutics for $2.7 billion.
  • AstraZeneca in November said it signed a licensing agreement with Chinese biotech company Eccogene to develop an obesity pill.
  • Novo Nordisk in August said it will acquire the privately held obesity drugmaker Inversago Pharma for $1.08 billion. 
  • Novo Nordisk in August said it will acquire Embark Biotech, which develops obesity and diabetes drugs, for up to $500 million. 
  • Eli Lilly in July said it will acquire privately held obesity drugmaker Versanis for $1.93 billion.

In a statement to CNBC, Novo Nordisk said it has increased its focus on “sourcing and elevating external innovation” to complement its in-house products and broaden its drug pipeline, especially for diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease and rare blood disorders.

The company also said it is interested in the “full range of business development activities,” from acquisitions to partnerships on early or late-stage products, when it comes to companies with new biological drugs, new potential treatment targets and new mechanisms of action, or how a drug works.

Chen said acquisitions or partnerships may be the only way for small- to mid-cap weight loss drugmakers to catch up with Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk.

Some smaller companies have indicated that they are open to the idea: Altimmune said Dec. 5 that it is looking for partners to launch and develop its experimental obesity drug pemvidutide. 

Shares of Altimmune have jumped more than 140% since Nov. 30, when the company released mid-stage trial data showing that its injectable drug caused 15.6% weight loss on average after 48 weeks.

Other smaller weight loss drugmakers include Structure Therapeutics, whose once-daily pill helped overweight or obese patients lose up to 10 pounds of weight on average after a month in an early-stage trial. The company is expected to report mid-stage trial data on its drug in diabetes patients this month and more results on the pill in patients with obesity early next year, Guggenheim’s Fernandez noted. 

Still, some bigger drugmakers may wait to see larger and later-stage data from smaller companies before moving to acquire them. That data may not come out until 2025 or later for many firms, said Fernandez.

Elliott Wilson Apologizes To Kai Cenat After Nicki Minaj Dispute

Elliott Wilson has issued a public apology to Twitch streamer Kai Cenat after feeling some type of way about his interview with Nicki Minaj earlier this week.

The hip hop journalist had previously interviewed the rapper when she dropped her 2014 album, ‘The Pinkprint,’ and again in 2018, following the release of ‘Queen.’ But amid her promotional campaign to support her latest record, ‘Pink Friday 2,’ Wilson wasn’t in the books for a sit-down chat.

On Thursday (December 14), the XXL editor took to his X account and shared a short clip of Minaj twerking during Cenat’s live stream. He captioned the photo, “Hip hop journalism,” a comment some fans perceived as an insult to the Twitch star.

Hip Hop journalist Elliott Wilson shared his thoughts on Kai Cenat’s livestream with Nicki Minaj. 👀 pic.twitter.com/rmvRcGMFdA

— No Jumper (@nojumper) December 14, 2023

Elliott Wilson Takes Accountability After Nicki Minaj Clapped Back

Wison has previously taken issue with artists often neglecting traditional hip hop for creators with mass audiences. Amid Nicki’s interview with Kai and Funny Marco, Wilson decided to voice his opinion. Social media, Nicki Minaj, and her fan base, the Barbz, didn’t think it needed to be at Cenat’s expense.

After coming across his initial tweet, Minaj didn’t hesitate to respond as she lashed out at Wilson for his remark before calling out his journalistic practices. She accused him of manipulating narratives to make her appear in a negative light.

“Elliot, if you’d spit JayZ d*** out for one second, you’d be able to be happy for the new comers,” the ‘Barbie Dangerous’ artist posted on Friday (December 15) in response to Wilson’s remark about the live stream.

She added:

“Isn’t that how y’all tried to tarnish my image? By saying I’m not welcoming new btchs in? Did songs with all of them tho. Why you not happy for a young black man like Kai. Tmrw btch.”

Nicki Minaj later elaborated on the situation, telling fans that Wilson had allegedly disrespected her in several tweets in the past as she referred to him as “Idiot Wilson.” She added, Nobody owes you s**t, h** n***a. F**k you!” 

RELATED: Watch Viral Moments From Kai Cenat’s Livestream With Nicki Minaj (VIDEOS)

pic.twitter.com/gii4KnAU7u

— Elliott Wilson (@ElliottWilson) December 15, 2023

 

The podcast host attempted to clear the air by responding to Minaj as he clarified he was not disrespecting her with the tweet.

“Never dissed Nicki. Always said she’s the female rap [GOAT]. Over Lauryn, Missy, Kim and Foxy and all. I think Cardi B is dope too. Happy Holidays.”

On Saturday (December 16), however, Wilson hopped back on the social media platform to apologize for his comment, saying that he was out of line and should’ve never discredited the platform Cenat has been able to build from the ground up.

“I apologize to @KaiCenat + his fam,” Wilson wrote. “I was out of line and let my competitive nature get the best of me. Kai carved his own lane in the game, built a great platform and deserves respect. Salute the streamers and young creatives getting to the paper and pushing our culture forward.”

See the post below.

Activision Blizzard agrees to settle California intercourse discrimination case

Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick speaks at the CNBC Evolve conference November 19th in Los Angeles.

Jesse Grant | CNBC

Microsoft-owned Activision Blizzard has agreed to settle a case from a California state agency that alleged the video game publisher discriminated against women, including denying them promotion opportunities and paying them less.

California’s Civil Rights Department said in a statement on Friday that as part of a proposed settlement agreement, Activision Blizzard will pay nearly $55 million to provide relief to female employees and contractors from October 2015 to December 2020 and cover legal fees. About $46 million of the total will go to the fund for affected women, the agency said in the statement.

The news comes almost two years after Activision Blizzard settled a case from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which pointed to sexual harassment, pregnancy discrimination and retaliation. As a result, the company agreed to form an $18 million fund to pay victims.

In 2021, the agency, then known as the Department of Fair Employment and Housing, filed a suit against the company, presenting allegations of sexual harassment, discrimination and retaliation. Months later, the Wall Street Journal reported that while Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick was aware of allegations of misconduct inside the company, he didn’t share all relevant information with its board.

Shares fell, and Microsoft subsequently began talks to acquire Activision Blizzard, the maker of Call of Duty.

The $69 billion deal closed in October after regulators in the U.S. and Europe looked carefully at it. The Federal Trade Commission argued in San Francisco appellate court last week that a federal judge made mistakes in rejecting the regulatory agency’s attempt to stop the companies from completing the transaction.

The Los Angeles County Superior Court must approve Activision’s settlement with the state agency, according to the statement. The agency will file a new complaint that excludes prior harassment allegations, according to the proposed settlement agreement, which CNBC viewed.

The agreement would require Activision to keep up efforts around inclusion of underrepresented people in recruiting. Except when compensation is non-negotiable, the company would have to tell job applicants in writing at the start of hiring and promotion processes that they can negotiate their pay.

“We appreciate the importance of the issues addressed in this agreement and we are dedicated to fully implementing all the new obligations we have assumed as part of it,” Activision said in a statement to CNBC.

WATCH: Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick: We always believed the deal would get through

Rudy Giuliani ordered to pay Georgia election employees for defamation

Rudy Giuliani at 60 Centre Street in Manhattan on Thursday, Sept. 8, 2022.

Theodore Parisienne | Tribune News Service | Getty Images

A federal jury on Friday ordered Rudy Giuliani to pay over $148 million to two Georgia election workers for falsely claiming they committed ballot fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

The jaw-dropping figure includes $75 million in punitive damages, along with awards of $20 million to each of the two election workers for emotional distress and more than $16 million each for defamation.

Giuliani was in court as the verdict was read aloud by a federal judge.

The defamation damage award is the latest in a series of legal blows to Giuliani related to his service as the top campaign lawyer for Donald Trump in efforts to reverse the former Republican president’s loss in that election.

Giuliani, Trump, and 17 other defendants were indicted this summer on state criminal court charges in Georgia in connection with their attempts to undo Trump’s defeat.

The civil verdict by the jury Friday came a after Giuliani’s lawyer said he would not testify in the case in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., reversing his supposed plans to do so.

The plaintiffs in the case, Ruby Freeman and Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, who are mother and daughter, sued Giuliani in 2021 for defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress and civil conspiracy.

Courtroom sketch of Ruby Freeman and Wandrea “Shaye” Moss during Rudy Giuliani’s defamation trial on Dec. 14th, 2023.

Artist: Bill Hennessy

Judge Beryl Howell in August issued a default judgment against Giuliani in the women’s favor because he had repeatedly failed to comply with orders requiring him to turn over evidence to their attorneys. Giuliani previously had conceded that for the purposes of the lawsuit he had made false statements about the women that were defamatory.

Howell’s ruling meant that the trial would only determine how much money the former New York City mayor would pay the women in damages.

On Tuesday, a social media expert had testified that it would cost the women between $17 million and nearly $48 million to fix the damage to their reputations as a result of the lies told about them by Giuliani and others.

Read more CNBC politics coverage

Giuliani had said at a Georgia Senate hearing after the 2020 election that Freeman and Moss at a ballot counting location had passed each other USB flash drives like “vials of heroin or cocaine” as part of a scheme to defraud Trump of an election win. Moss later testified to Congress that she and her mother were passing candy.

Freeman testified during the trial that after Giuliani made his claims about her and her daughter, they received non-stop threats, and that she left her home for two months at the beginning of 2021 at the recommendation of the FBI.

“We are coming for you and your family!” one email sent to Freeman said, according to evidence shown to jurors. “Ms. Ruby, safest place for you right now is in prison. Or you will swing from the trees.”

Freeman wept on the witness stand, “It’s so scary every time I go somewhere if I have to use my name.”

Joseph Sibley, Giuliani’s attorney in the case, did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

This is breaking news. Check back for updates.

Moderna, Merck most cancers vaccine reduces danger of pores and skin most cancers return

An exterior view of Moderna’s clinical manufacturing facility. 

David L. Ryan | Boston Globe | Getty Images

Moderna and Merck‘s experimental cancer vaccine, when used in combination with Merck’s blockbuster therapy Keytruda, reduced the risk of death or relapse in patients with the most deadly form of skin cancer after three years, according to midstage trial data released Thursday. 

The combination specifically slashed the risk of death or recurrence of the cancer, known as melanoma, by 49% in patients in later stages of the disease compared to those who received Keytruda alone after three years. The cancer vaccine in combination with Keytruda also reduced the risk of melanoma spreading to other parts of the body by 62%.

Those results build on midstage trial data the companies released earlier this year, which showed the efficacy of the combination in the same 157 patients over a shorter period. After around two years, the vaccine and Keytruda cut the risk of death or relapse by 44% in melanoma patients, and reduced the risk of the cancer spreading in the body by 65%, according to the earlier trial data. 

The most common side effects of the vaccine after three years were fatigue, injection site pain and chills, according to Thursday’s data.

The new results suggest that the cancer shot used with the immunotherapy continues to provide meaningful health benefits to melanoma patients after they stay on the treatment for a longer period of time. The two drugmakers are continuing to study the combination as a treatment for melanoma in a late-stage trial, which began in July.

The vaccine, which uses the same mRNA technology as Moderna’s Covid vaccine, is custom-built based on an analysis of a patient’s tumors after surgical removal. The shot is designed to train the immune system to recognize and attack specific mutations in cancer cells.

Merck’s Keytruda, which is approved to treat melanoma and other cancers, belongs to a class of widely used immunotherapies known as checkpoint inhibitors designed to disable a certain protein that helps cancer evade the immune system.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration gave breakthrough therapy designation to the cancer vaccine for the treatment of melanoma in February, which is intended to speed up the development and review of treatments for serious and life-threatening diseases.

Moderna and Merck are also testing the vaccine with Keytruda against other tumor types. On Monday, the drugmakers started a late-stage trial on the combination as a treatment for non-small cell lung cancer.

Melanoma is responsible for the large majority of skin cancer deaths, according to the American Cancer Society. The rate of melanoma has increased rapidly over the past few decades, according to the organization.

About 100,000 people will be diagnosed with melanoma in the U.S. this year and nearly 8,000 people are expected to die from the disease, according to the American Cancer Society.

Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO:

IRS rejects 20,000 tax refund claims for worker retention credit score

IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel speaks during an IRS event on August 2, 2023 in McLean, Virginia.

Alex Wong | Getty Images

The IRS is sending more than 20,000 rejection letters to taxpayers who wrongly claimed a pandemic-era tax break as the agency continues its crackdown on “dubious” filings.

Created to support small businesses during the Covid-19 pandemic, the employee retention credit, or ERC, is worth thousands of dollars per eligible employee. However, the tax break sparked a wave of companies pushing small businesses to wrongly claim the credit — and the agency temporarily stopped processing new filings in September amid a “surge of questionable claims.”

“With the aggressive marketing we saw with this credit, it’s not surprising that we’re seeing claims that clearly fall outside of the legal requirements,” IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel said in a statement Wednesday.

More from Personal Finance:
Supreme Court case on ‘income’ could have major implications for taxpayers
Credit card debt is ‘the biggest threat to building wealth,’ poll finds
Job data suggests ‘soft landing’ is increasingly likely, economists say

Starting this week, ineligible taxpayers will start receiving copies of Letter 105 C for disallowed claims. Later this month, the IRS will unveil a “voluntary disclosure program” for taxpayers who wrongly claimed the credit. The agency is rejecting filings from entities that didn’t exist or didn’t have paid employees during the eligibility period.

“The action we are taking today is part of an initial set of steps in our compliance work in this area,” Werfel said. “More letters will be going out in the near future, including both disallowance letters and letters seeking the return of funds erroneously claimed and received.”

The announcement comes less than two months since the IRS unveiled a special withdrawal process for small businesses that wrongly claimed the credit to avoid repayment, interest and penalties.

Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO:

Potential Trump 2024 Faux Electors Will not Take part As a result of They Are Scared Of Going To Jail

Arrests and criminal prosecutions are proving to be an effective way of deterring Republicans from participating in a potential Trump attack on the 2024 election.

The Washington Post reported:

In the past few months, 25 of those 84 electors have been charged with felonies, such as forgery, false statements, and filing false documents. Ten more have agreed as part of a lawsuit settlement to not serve as electors in any election in which Trump is on the ballot. And 13 others in Georgia have been labeled “unindicted co-conspirators.”

The publicity surrounding those investigations, and the specter of tarnished reputations and heavy legal costs, are likely to discourage future Trump electors — should the former president secure the GOP nomination next year — from casting votes for him in a state where Biden is again declared the winner, many Republicans said.

While the fake elector scheme was novel in 2020, with many pro-Trump electors claiming they didn’t fully understand how their votes would be used, those who engage in similar activities in the future could find it harder to claim they didn’t know they could be held criminally liable. Another discouraging force: a new federal law that tightened the rules surrounding the counting of electoral college votes every four years.

Multiple states have sent the message to Republicans not to mess with their elections. Investigations in Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Nevada and the criminal charges against Trump’s fake electors in several of those states are having the same impact that the 1/6 prosecutions have had on Trump’s calls for political violence.

Republicans have shown that even though they support Donald Trump, the vast majority of them aren’t willing to ruin their lives and go to jail for him.

The Electoral Count Reform Act has made it virtually impossible for Trump to replicate the 2020 fake elector, but if his campaign is thinking about pulling anything else, they are likely to have a difficult time recruiting co-conspirators at the Republican state and local levels.

Donald Trump is using the same strategy that he relied on in 2016 and 2020, but his support does not appear to be as passionate within the Republican Party. After the 1/6 attack, lawmakers took steps to change the law.

The MAGAs have realized that when they follow Trump’s order, they go to jail, while he goes to golf, and as the nation heads into 2024, many of them no longer are willing to take the fall for Donald Trump.

A Special Message From PoliticusUSA

If you are in a position to donate purely to help us keep the doors open on PoliticusUSA during what is a critical election year, please do so here.

We have been honored to be able to put your interests first for 14 years as we only answer to our readers and we will not compromise on that fundamental, core PoliticusUSA value.

Jason is the managing editor. He is also a White House Press Pool and a Congressional correspondent for PoliticusUSA. Jason has a Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science. His graduate work focused on public policy, with a specialization in social reform movements.

Awards and  Professional Memberships

Member of the Society of Professional Journalists and The American Political Science Association

15 Issues You Ought to Pack To Keep away from Checking a Bag on the Airport

We independently selected these products because we love them, and we think you might like them at these prices. E! has affiliate relationships, so we may get a commission if you purchase something through our links. Items are sold by the retailer, not E!. Prices are accurate as of publish time.

Does anyone actually enjoy being at the airport? You wait in line to check a bag, wait in line to get through security, wait in line to get off the plane, and then wait in line to get your checked bag before waiting for your ride home. Long story short, it’s just way too much waiting around when you have better things to do during your travels. If you want to cut down on the airport time, you can skip the checked bag and bring a strategically-packed carry-on bag instead.

If you don’t think a carry-on is going to cut it, you just need a few helpful products to make it all work. Stash some small items in this scarf with secret zip-up compartments. Pack your clothes in these compression cubes that take up 60% less space in your bag. Use this foldable duffle for a personal item on your flight home if you shop on trips.

These 15 things will help you maximize your carry-on space so you can hit the ground running as soon as you land.

Elon Musk reactivates Alex Jones’ X account

C.E.O. of Tesla, Chief Engineer of SpaceX and C.T.O. of X Elon Musk takes the stage during the New York Times annual DealBook summit on November 29, 2023 in New York City. 

Michael M. Santiago | Getty Images

Elon Musk on Sunday reinstated the account of conspiracy theorist Alex Jones on X, formerly Twitter, reneging on a year-ago vow to keep Jones off the social network.

Jones was previously suspended from Twitter in 2018 for violating the company’s “abusive behavior policy.” That suspension, deemed permanent under the company’s prior management, came as Jones faced a defamation lawsuit for spreading the false claim that the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting was a hoax.

Musk’s decision to bring Jones back to X comes on the anniversary week of the Sandy Hook shooting.

Although 20 children and six educators were killed by a gunman at Sandy Hook Elementary School on Dec. 14, 2012, in Newtown, Connecticut, Jones had falsely and repeatedly said on his show, Infowars, that the shooting never really happened, and was a staged event designed to bring about stricter gun laws.

Infowars still appeared to be banned from X as of Sunday.

Believers in Jones’ conspiracies would go on to harass and threaten bereft family members, in some cases physically confronting and accusing grieving parents of being crisis actors whose children had never existed, according to reports by the Associated Press. Some of those targeted had to move from their homes multiple times and could not safely visit the graves of their loved ones.

Sandy Hook victims’ relatives sued Jones in Texas and Connecticut, winning a nearly $1.5 billion judgment against him. Jones sought but did not receive personal bankruptcy protection to try to avoid paying more than $1 billion of that judgment.

Users of the Elon Musk-led X social media platform had anticipated the reinstatement of Jones since at least Thursday, when Musk said he would consider reinstating Jones.

“Since this platform aspires to be the global town square, permanent bans should be extremely rare,” Musk wrote in a Thursday post.

Musk confirmed the reinstatement on Sunday after launching a poll on X that garnered nearly 2 million votes, over half of which favored reinstating Jones.

Musk said Jones “cannot break the law,” but that if he does spread misinformation, X’s community notes feature will correct him.

Jones’ first activity on the platform in over five years was to repost a welcome-back message from Andrew Tate — an influencer known for spouting misogynistic views online and awaiting trial for charges of rape, human trafficking and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit women in Romania. (Tate has sued the accusers who made those charges.) X has allowed Tate to monetize his account and Tate has said that he generated tens of thousands of dollars on X, previously.

While Musk — who is also CEO of Tesla and SpaceX — bills himself as a free speech defender, he has wielded his control of the X platform to suspend the accounts of perceived enemies and vocal critics there. For example, X suspended the accounts of software developer Travis Brown, a same-day private jet tracker account built by Jack Sweeney, and Aaron Greenspan, the founder of legal and public records database PlainSite.

Under Musk’s management, X has also sued a progressive watchdog group, Media Matters for America, and one of its staff members alleging defamation. The suit followed an investigative report MMfA published that said blatantly Nazi content ran on the social network alongside ads from mainstream brands there.

Musk has faced a backlash for changes he’s made at Twitter since taking over the platform in late October 2022, including the widespread reversal of account suspensions. He famously reversed the suspension of former President Donald Trump.

In recent weeks, many major advertisers suspended their campaigns on X after Musk promoted what the White House called “antisemitic and racist hate” on the site. Musk would go on to tell those advertisers to “go f**k yourselves,” and “don’t advertise,” from the stage of the 2023 DealBook Summit in New York.

First CRISPR gene-editing remedy authorized in U.S.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Friday approved the country’s first gene-editing treatment, Casgevy, for use in patients with sickle cell disease.

The approval comes about a decade after the discovery of CRISPR technology for editing human DNA, representing a significant scientific advancement. Yet reaching the tens of thousands of people who could benefit from the treatment could be challenging given the potential hurdles — including cost, at $2.2 million per patient — of administering the complex therapy.

Casgevy, co-developed by Vertex Pharmaceuticals and CRISPR Therapeutics, uses Nobel Prize-winning technology CRISPR to edit a person’s genes to treat disease. The treatment was approved by U.K. regulators last month.

Shares of Vertex fell 1% Friday, while shares of CRISPR fell 8%.

Sickle cell, an inherited blood disorder, causes red blood cells to become misshapen half moons that get stuck inside blood vessels, restricting blood flow and causing what are known as pain crises. About 100,000 Americans are estimated to have the disease.

This microscope photo provided on Oct. 25, 2023, by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows crescent-shaped red blood cells from a sickle cell disease patient in 1972. Britain’s medicines regulator has authorized the world’s first gene therapy treatment for sickle cell disease, in a move that could offer relief to thousands of people with the crippling disease in the U.K.

Dr. F. Gilbert/CDC via AP, File

Casgevy uses CRISPR to make an edit to a person’s DNA that turns on fetal hemoglobin, a protein that normally shuts off shortly after birth, to help red blood cells keep their healthy full-moon shape. In clinical trials, Casgevy eliminated pain crises in most patients.

The FDA approved the treatment for people 12 years and older.

“Sickle cell disease is a rare, debilitating and life-threatening blood disorder with significant unmet need, and we are excited to advance the field especially for individuals whose lives have been severely disrupted by the disease,” said Dr. Nicole Verdun, director of the Office of Therapeutic Products within the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, in a statement.

“Gene therapy holds the promise of delivering more targeted and effective treatments, especially for individuals with rare diseases where the current treatment options are limited,” Verdun added.

While the treatment itself is administered only once, the whole process takes months. Blood stem cells are extracted and isolated before being sent to Vertex’s lab, where they’re genetically modified. Once ready, patients receive chemotherapy for a few days to clear out the old cells and make room for the new ones. After the new cells are infused, recipients spend weeks in the hospital recovering. 

Vertex will take the lead on launching the drug and estimates about 16,000 people with severe cases of sickle cell will be eligible.

Even among the people who could benefit the most, analysts worry few will clamor for a treatment that takes months to complete, carries the risk of infertility and could be cost prohibitive. Vertex said in a regulatory filing Friday it will charge $2.2 million per patient for the treatment.

“We believe the price of medicine to reflect the value that it brings, and the value that this brings is a one-time therapy for potentially a lifetime of cure,” Vertex CEO Dr. Reshma Kewalramani said Friday in an interview with CNBC.

Vertex is seeing “unanimous enthusiasm” from payers, patients and physicians, because people with sickle cell have been marginalized, Kewalramani said, and the field hasn’t seen much innovation.

Because the procedure is so complex, it will be limited to certain health facilities like academic medical centers. Nine health-care facilities are ready to start administering Casgevy, Vertex said in a release, with more facilities added in the coming weeks.

Bluebird’s Lyfgenia 

The FDA also on Friday approved a separate gene therapy by Bluebird Bio, called Lyfgenia that works differently than Casgevy but is administered similarly and is also intended to eliminate pain crises. That therapy was similarly approved for the treatment of sickle cell disease in people 12 years and older.

Bluebird will charge $3.1 million per patient for Lyfgenia. Shares of that company, which has a market value of just about $300 million, fell 40% Friday.

Dr. Peter Marks, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, estimated during a call with reporters Friday that across the two therapies approved Friday, close to 20,000 patients will be eligible for treatment.

But the FDA included a black-box warning – the strongest safety warning label –  to Bluebird Bio’s Lyfgenia, noting that in rare cases the therapy can cause certain blood cancers. 

The FDA added that warning after two patients who received Lyfgenia in a clinical trial died from a form of leukemia, Verdun told reporters Friday. 

The agency said it’s still unclear whether Lyfgenia itself or another part of the treatment process, such as the chemotherapy, caused the cancer.

But Marks said that the FDA wants patients to be aware of all potential side effects of the entire treatment process: “It’s about the totality of the therapy that’s given,” he told reporters.

Vertex did not see similar blood cancer cases in its clinical trial, which is why it did not receive a black-box warning on its label, Verdun noted.

Both Bluebird Bio and Vertex will follow patients who receive the treatments for 15 years as part of a post-approval study. The FDA has encouraged the companies to specifically monitor for malignancies, or the presence of cancerous cells that can spread to other sites of the body.