Excessive-cost weight reduction medication enhance vitamin counseling with employers

Packages of weight loss drugs Wegovy, Ozempic and Mounjaro.

Picture Alliance | Getty Images

A few years ago, when Virta Health founder and CEO Sami Inkinen approached employers about leveraging the company’s nutrition-oriented digital diabetes program for obesity-related weight loss, most companies weren’t ready to commit. 

Now, more employers are all in on nutritional counseling and coaching as they grapple with rising costs for diabetes and weight loss drugs such as Novo Nordisk’s Ozempic and Wegovy and Eli Lilly’s Mounjaro and Zepbound. 

“Our goal is not to drive the maximum number of GLP-1 prescriptions, but we are the telemedicine company of choice for many employers to responsibly use these drugs, and then also get members off of these drugs and sustain the weight loss nutritionally,” said Inkinen.

The company published a peer-reviewed study a year ago which found that patients on Virta’s nutrition-counseling programs maintained weight loss one year after they stopped using GLP-1s. But Inkinen says less than 10% of the company’s weight loss enrollees are using the popular drugs — most opt for nutrition counseling alone and still lose an average of 13% of their weight over the course of one year.  

“Quite frankly, despite the message that maybe the pharma companies are pushing, nobody really wants to be on these drugs forever, if you get the choice and the tools,” he said.

For Virta, the demand for such services resulted in record 60% revenue growth in 2024 to more than $100 million, according to Inkinen.

He said the 10-year-old startup is on pace to be profitable in the second half of this year.  

More employers require weight loss engagement

Companies surveyed by the Purchaser Business Group on Health said glucagon-like peptide medications, commonly known as GLP-1 drugs, are now a top driver of employer plan drug costs, with 96% of those surveyed expressing concerns about the long-term cost implications.

As a result, more employers are looking to utilization management strategies such as nutrition counseling and coaching services.

“Most employers want their plan members to have access to weight-management medication options, such as GLP-1s, however, they also want to ensure that it’s clinically appropriate and accompanied by the medical and lifestyle modification supports to ensure long-term safety and efficacy for the individual,” said Randa Deaton, vice president of purchaser engagement with Purchaser Business Group on Health.

Yet, using those programs sometimes result in new headwinds when it comes to pricing for GLP-1s in their pharmacy benefits plans, Deaton notes.

“We’ve seen that PBMs and drug manufacturers have been reducing their rebates when employers are requiring a lifestyle management intervention as part of the drug criteria, so it has been challenging for employers to put in place the right programs to support their workers and family members,” she said.

One of Virta Health’s rivals, Omada Health, is also seeing strong demand for its GLP-1 weight loss management program, after partnering with Cigna’s Evernorth pharmacy benefits division on a program called EncircleRx. Program enrollment went from 2 million covered lives in the second quarter of 2024 to 8 million in the third quarter, according to Cigna CEO David Cordani.

“The market continues to absorb the challenges of affordability” of GLP-1 drugs and is looking for a more value-based approach, Cordani told analysts on the company’s Q3 earnings call.

“Clients are observing, and physicians are observing the start-and-stop dynamic that is transpiring for some patients, which also doesn’t generate the desired or intended outcome,” he said.

2025 IPO speculation

For both Virta and Omada, the GLP-1 growth dynamic is fueling speculation that the startups, which are both over a decade old, could go public this year — if market conditions are right.

Omada Health reportedly filed a confidential registration to go public with the Securities and Exchange Commission last summer, according to Business Insider. The company has declined to comment on the report.

Virta Health was valued at $2 billion following its last round of funding in 2021. It is Inkinen’s second startup. He was one of the co-founders of online real estate firm Trulia, which went public in 2012 and was later bought by rival Zillow.

As for Virta IPO plans, Inkinen says for now he’s focused on growing the company.

“If you have a thing that’s working, it is 1,000 times easier to just scale your thing, your team, your culture,” he said.

Supreme Court docket rejects Trump hush cash sentencing delay bid

Former U.S. President Donald Trump, alongside his attorney Todd Blanche, speaks to the media as he arrives for his criminal trial for allegedly covering up hush money payments at Manhattan Criminal Court on May 30, 2024 in New York City.

Michael M. Santiago | Via Reuters

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday narrowly denied a request by President-elect Donald Trump to halt proceedings in his New York criminal hush money case, clearing the way for him to be sentenced on Friday morning.

Two conservatives — Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett — joined liberal justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson in the 5-4 decision opposing Trump’s bid for an emergency stay.

The other conservatives, Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, would have granted the president-elect’s request, the court said in a brief order.

The majority determined that Trump’s sentencing would impose a “relatively insubstantial” burden on his presidential responsibilities since he is expected to receive a sentence that entails no actual punishment, according to the order.

The five justices were also unswayed by Trump’s arguments about the use of certain evidence during his criminal trial.

Those alleged evidentiary violations “can be addressed in the ordinary course on appeal,” the majority ruled, according to the order.

In arguing against the stay of sentencing, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office had argued the Supreme Court did not have jurisdiction over the case because Trump has not exhausted his appeals of his conviction in state court.

The Supreme Court’s decision came hours after New York state’s highest appeals court refused to delay the sentencing.

Trump said, “I respect the court’s opinion.”

“I think it was actually a very good opinion for us, because you saw what they said, but they invited the appeal,” Trump said at a roundtable event with 22 Republican governors.

 “We’re going to appeal [the conviction] anyway, just psychologically,” Trump said. “Because, frankly, it’s a disgrace.” 

Trump was convicted last May in state court in Manhattan of 34 counts of falsifying business records related to a $130,000 hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels before the 2016 presidential election.

Trump’s attorneys in a filing Wednesday at the Supreme Court filing argued that all further proceedings should be put on hold while the president-elect appeals the verdict.

The case should be stayed to “prevent grave injustice and harm to the institution of the Presidency and the operations of the federal government,” they wrote in the 51-page filing.

They argued that Trump, as president-elect, is immune from criminal prosecution. New York trial court Judge Juan Merchan had rejected that claim.

The lawyers also argued that the Manhattan D.A.’s Office violated Trump’s immunity privileges by using evidence of his official presidential acts during the hush money trial.

The Supreme Court last July greatly expanded the scope of presidential immunity when it ruled that former presidents enjoy “presumptive immunity” for all their official acts in office.

Prosecutors for Manhattan D.A. Alvin Bragg in a filing Thursday argued that “there is no basis” for the Supreme Court to intervene in the case.

The group of lawyers for the president-elect includes several who have been picked for top roles in the next administration’s Department of Justice.

A New York appeals court and the state’s highest court had both denied Trump’s bid to pause his Friday morning sentencing hearing.

Read more CNBC politics coverage

Merchan had already postponed Trump’s sentencing numerous times, both before and after the Nov. 5 presidential election.

The judge is expected to impose a sentence of “unconditional discharge,” which means Trump will not receive jail time, probation, fines or any other conditions.

On Wednesday afternoon, ABC News first reported that Trump spoke with conservative Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito one day before the president-elect asked the court for the immediate stay.

Alito confirmed that the Tuesday afternoon phone call took place, but said in a statement that the hush-money case did not come up.

“We did not discuss the emergency application he filed today, and indeed, I was not even aware at the time of our conversation that such an application would be filed,” Alito said.

— CNBC’s Dan Mangan contributed to this report.

Treasury delays deadline for small companies to file new BOI kind

Janet Yellen, U.S. Treasury secretary, on a tour of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) in Vienna, Virginia, on Jan. 8, 2024.

Valerie Plesch/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The U.S. Treasury Department has delayed the deadline for millions of small businesses to Jan. 13, 2025, to file a new form, known as a Beneficial Ownership Information report.

The Treasury had initially required many businesses to file the report to the agency’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, known as FinCEN, by Jan. 1. Noncompliance carries potential fines that could exceed $10,000.

This delay comes as a result of legal challenges to the new reporting requirement under the Corporate Transparency Act.

The rule applies to about 32.6 million businesses, including certain corporations, limited liability companies and others, according to federal estimates.

Businesses and owners that didn’t comply would potentially face civil penalties of up to $591 a day, adjusted for inflation, according to FinCEN. They could also face up to $10,000 in criminal fines and up to two years in prison.

However, many small businesses are exempt. For example, those with over $5 million in gross sales and more than 20 full-time employees may not need to file a report.

Why Treasury delayed the BOI reporting requirement

The Treasury delayed the compliance deadline following a recent court ruling.

A federal court in Texas on Dec. 3 had issued a nationwide preliminary injunction that temporarily blocked FinCEN from enforcing the rule. However, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed that injunction on Monday.

“Because the Department of the Treasury recognizes that reporting companies may need additional time to comply given the period when the preliminary injunction had been in effect, we have extended the reporting deadline,” according to the FinCEN website.

FinCEN didn’t return a request from CNBC for comment about the number of businesses that have filed a BOI report to date.

Some data, however, suggests few have done so.

The federal government had received about 9.5 million filings as of Dec. 1, according to statistics that FinCEN provided to the office of Rep. French Hill, R-Ark. That figure is about 30% of the estimated total.

Hill has called for the repeal of the Corporate Transparency Act, passed in 2021, which created the BOI requirement. Hill’s office provided the data to CNBC.

More from Personal Finance:
‘Returnuary’ — the year’s busiest return season is about to start
Why the ‘great resignation’ became the ‘great stay’
What tariffs mean for car prices

“Most non-exempt reporting companies have not filed their initial reports, presumably because they are unaware of the requirement,” Daniel Stipano, a partner at law firm Davis Polk & Wardwell, wrote in an e-mail.

There’s a potential silver lining for businesses: It’s “unlikely” FinCEN would impose financial penalties “except in cases of bad faith or intentional violations,” Stipano said.

“In its public statements, FinCEN has made clear that its primary goal at this point is to educate the public about the requirement, as opposed to taking enforcement actions against noncompliant companies,” he said.

Certain businesses are exempt from BOI filing

The BOI filing isn’t an annual requirement. Businesses only need to resubmit the form to update or correct information.

Many exempt businesses — such as large companies, banks, credit unions, tax-exempt entities and public utilities — already furnish similar data.

Businesses have different compliance deadlines depending on when they were formed.

For example, those created or registered before 2024 have until Jan. 13, 2025, to file their initial BOI reports, according to FinCEN. Those that do so on or after Jan. 1, 2025, have 30 days to file a report.

There will likely be additional court rulings that could impact reporting, Stipano said.

For one, litigation is ongoing in the 5th Circuit, which hasn’t formally ruled on the constitutionality of the Corporate Transparency Act.

“Judicial actions challenging the law have been brought in multiple jurisdictions, and these actions may eventually reach the Supreme Court,” he wrote. “As of now, it is unclear whether the incoming Trump administration will continue to support the Government’s position in these cases.”

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

Surgeon basic points new advisory

A customer drinks a glass of beer at the Saxton Pub in Austin, Texas, April 5, 2023.

Brandon Bell | Getty Images

The U.S. surgeon general issued a new advisory warning Friday about the link between alcohol consumption and increased cancer risk, and pushed for policy changes to help reduce the number of alcohol-related cancers.

U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy said there is a “well-established” link between drinking alcohol and at least seven types of cancer, including breast, colorectum, esophagus and liver. For cancers including breast, mouth and throat cancers, increased risk may start around one or fewer drinks per day, according to his office.

As part of the advisory, the surgeon general called for policy changes that could help reduce alcohol-related cancer. He pushed for alcohol labels to be more visible and include a warning about the increased risk of cancer, to reassess recommended limits for alcohol consumption based on the latest research and expand education to increase general awareness that alcohol consumption increases cancer risk.

The efforts outlined in the advisory are similar to those already implemented to lessen tobacco use, including a slew of mandated warnings on packaging and in stores.

The surgeon general advised people to consider the link between alcohol consumption and greater cancer risk when deciding whether to drink or how much to have.

Alcohol consumption is the third leading preventable cause of cancer in the U.S., behind only tobacco and obesity, according to the advisory.

“Alcohol is a well-established, preventable cause of cancer responsible for about 100,000 cases of cancer and 20,000 cancer deaths annually in the United States — greater than the 13,500 alcohol-associated traffic crash fatalities per year in the U.S. — yet the majority of Americans are unaware of this risk,” Murthy said in a press release.

Shares of alcohol manufacturers including Molson-Coors and Anheuser-Busch initially dipped more than 1% following the advisory.

According to the advisory, 72% of U.S. adults said they had one or more drinks per week between 2019 and 2020, but less than half of all adults are aware of the link between drinking and cancer risk.

Worldwide, 741,300 cases of cancer were attributed to alcohol consumption in 2020, according to the surgeon general.

On average, alcohol-related cancer deaths shorten the lives of those who die by 15 years.

Younger Americans are already increasingly stepping away from alcohol, and many are leaning into nonalcoholic alternatives. About two-thirds of adults ages 18 to 34 say alcohol consumption negatively affects health, versus less than 40% of people ages 35 to 54, and 55 and over, according to a Gallup survey released in August.

Chuck Schumer Shuts Kristen Welker Down After She Infers Democrats Lied About Biden’s Psychological Sharpness

PoliticusUSA is corporate and ad-free, which is why we need your support to be an alternative to access journalists who cater to Republicans and billionaires, so please consider becoming a subscriber.

With all of the things that are happening in our country or about to happen, NBC’s Kristen Welker wasn’t interested in the Republican refusal to do anything to lower prices, or their plan to cut taxes for the wealthy and corporations, or how Republicans are eying up paying for those tax cuts by taking healthcare away from millions of Americans.

Nope.

Kristen Welker decided she needed to ask Senate Minority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer about Democrats and Joe Biden’s mental sharpness.

Transcript from NBC News:

KRISTEN WELKER:

Obviously, there has been a lot of focus on President Biden’s role in this. You were obviously in close contact with President Biden well before the public tuned into that debate that ultimately led to him stepping down. I want to play you a little bit of something you said last year. Take a look.

[START TAPE]

SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER:

I talk to President Biden, you know, regularly, sometimes several times in a week, or usually several times in a week. His mental acuity is great. It’s fine. It’s as good as it’s been over the years. All this right-wing propaganda that his mental acuity has declined is wrong.

[END TAPE]

KRISTEN WELKER:

Leader Schumer, what do you say to Americans who feel as though you and other top Democrats misled them about President Biden’s mental acuity?

SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER:

No. Look, we didn’t. And let’s – let’s look – let’s look at President Biden. He’s had an amazing record. The legislation we passed, one of the most significant groups of legislation since the New Deal – since Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society, putting in 235 judges, a record. And he’s a patriot. He’s a great guy. And when he stepped down, he did it on his own because he thought it was better not only for the Democratic Party, for America. We should all salute him. We should all salute him.

KRISTEN WELKER:

Do you feel, as we have this conversation today, that President Biden could serve another four years, had he stayed in the race and potentially won?

SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER:

Well, I’m not going to speculate. As I said, I think his record is a stellar one. And he’ll go down in history as a really outstanding president.

Video:

Months after pushing Joe Biden out of his own reelection campaign, the mainstream media won’t let it go. Now, they are attacking the Democratic Party and suggesting that there was some sort of cover-up.

Washington Submit cartoonist quits after drawing of Bezos, different billionaires with Trump rejected

Editorial cartoonist Ann Telnaes

Courtesy of Ann Telnaes

A Washington Post cartoonist has quit her role at the paper, saying that her bosses blocked publication of a satirical cartoon that depicted billionaires, including one resembling Post owner Jeff Bezos, kneeling before President-elect Donald Trump.

Ann Telnaes, a Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist, said in a blog post Friday that she quit the paper after a drawing was rejected. This was the first time at the Post that a cartoon was “killed because of who or what I chose to aim my pen at,” Telnaes wrote.

A rough sketch of the cartoon, published on Telnaes’ Substack blog, shows several men kneeling before a larger man wearing a suit and a long tie, representing Trump. Telnaes wrote that the likenesses are of Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Los Angeles Times Publisher Patrick Soon-Shiong, and Bezos. Three of the men are holding bags of money. Also included is a drawing of cartoon character Mickey Mouse, representing Walt Disney‘s ABC News.

Satirical drawing by Washington Post cartoonist Ann Telnaes, who resigned after it was rejected.

Courtesy of Ann Telnaes

The drawing was rejected by the paper outright, with no suggestions for potential changes, Telnaes told CNBC in an email.

David Shipley, Washington Post editorial page editor, said in a statement that the cartoon was rejected because of its similarity to columns at the paper, not because of who it targeted.

“I respect Ann Telnaes and all she has given to The Post. But I must disagree with her interpretation of events. Not every editorial judgment is a reflection of a malign force. My decision was guided by the fact that we had just published a column on the same topic as the cartoon and had already scheduled another column – this one a satire – for publication. The only bias was against repetition,” Shipley’s statement said.

The cartoonist’s departure comes amid controversy about how media and corporate executives have been treating Trump, both before and after the November election.

The Washington Post reported that Bezos spiked a planned endorsement of Trump opponent Kamala Harris by the paper ahead of the presidential election. At the Los Angeles Times, Soon-Shiong also decided that the paper should withhold any endorsement in the presidential race, spurring the resignation of several editorial board members.

ABC News, meanwhile, settled a defamation lawsuit with Trump for $15 million, which drew criticism from some media law experts who thought the news organization had a strong case.

Bezos and Zuckerberg, through Meta, planned to donate $1 million to Trump’s inaugural fund, the Wall Street Journal reported last month, and have been among several billionaires to meet with Trump at his home in Mar-a-Lago since his election win. Multiple outlets have reported that OpenAI’s Altman is also donating $1 million to the inauguration fund.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., weighed in on Telnaes’ resignation on X, saying the cartoon was “worth a share”: “Big Tech executives are bending the knee to Donald Trump and it’s no surprise why: Billionaires like Jeff Bezos like paying a lower tax rate than a public school teacher.”

Telnaes’ departure is the latest of several internal shakeups at the Post. Publisher and CEO Will Lewis took over the paper last year and has clashed with the newsroom, as reported by NPR. Several top editors at the paper have left since Lewis took over.

Telnaes won the Pulitzer Prize for editorial cartooning in 2001. She wrote in her blog that she had worked for the Post since 2008.

Inside Pamela Anderson’s Jaw-Dropping Transformation By way of the Years

Pamela Anderson continues to reinvent herself.

The Last Showgirl star—who is nominated at the 2025 Golden Globes for her leading role as a seasoned Las Vegas showgirl forced to face retirement—is entering awards season with a fresh face, going makeup free since 2023.

“I’ve been playing characters my whole life,” Pamela told Entertainment Tonight last month. “I want to play characters in movies, not in my personal life. I just want to be me, so this is an experiment. It’s just something I feel drawn to do.”

And while she said she “didn’t even think anyone would notice,” the Baywatch alum—who is mom to sons Brandon Thomas, 28, and Dylan Jagger, 27, with ex Tommy Lee—has shared the positive impact her decision has made on others.

“I didn’t realize that it was going to resonate with so many people,” she said during an October episode of Today With Hoda and Jenna. “I had people coming up to me and thanking me. It’s just really interesting to see the ripple effect it’s had. But I did it for myself. I did it for myself just to say I’m good enough as I am, and I don’t need to chase this impossible dream.”

FDA Zepbound scarcity ends, impacts sufferers, compounding pharmacies

An injection pen of Zepbound, Eli Lilly’s weight loss drug, is displayed in New York City on Dec. 11, 2023.

Brendan McDermid | Reuters

The roughly $1,000 monthly price tag of Eli Lilly‘s weight loss drug Zepbound put the blockbuster treatment out of reach for Willow Baillies, 29, whose insurance does not cover it.

Baillies, a human resources specialist based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, has been attempting to lose weight and dealing with chronic autoimmune issues for years, so she turned to a cheaper alternative: a compounded, off-brand version of tirzepatide.

Tirzepatide is the active ingredient in Zepbound and in Eli Lilly’s diabetes counterpart Mounjaro, which are part of a class of highly popular medications called GLP-1s. 

She said compounded tirzepatide has helped change her life dramatically since she began taking it in June, alleviating pain from her autoimmune issues and helping her lose about 52 pounds. She said it costs her around $350 per month.

But soon, compounded versions of tirzepatide could become inaccessible to Baillies and other patients who rely on them. Patients and health-care experts said that could force some consumers to stockpile doses, switch to other treatments, or stop receiving care altogether due to financial constraints. Others could turn to a potentially unsafe method of mixing vials themselves. 

That’s because the Food and Drug Administration on Thursday announced that branded tirzepatide is no longer in short supply — a decision that will largely prevent compounding pharmacies from making and selling cheaper versions of the drug in the next two to three months. 

During FDA-declared shortages, pharmacists can legally make compounded versions of brand-name medications. But drugmakers and some health experts have pushed back against the practice because the FDA does not approve compounded drugs, which are essentially custom-made copies prescribed by a doctor to meet a specific patient’s needs. 

The FDA’s decision, based on the agency’s comprehensive analysis of data, could mean that more patients with insurance coverage will be able to access Zepbound after months of limited supply. It also suggests that Eli Lilly’s multibillion-dollar effort to ramp up manufacturing for tirzepatide is starting to pay off. 

But it will also leave other patients in limbo, closing a niche, lucrative market for compounded tirzepatide that patients say helped fill a gap in care for those who can’t afford to pay out of pocket for Zepbound.

Many insurance plans still don’t cover drugs for weight loss, and some patients said prices under Eli Lilly’s savings program and for its half-priced vial versions are still too high.

“I’ve stockpiled 10 compounded vials at home, so I have at least a year’s worth,” said Baillies, one of six patients CNBC spoke with about compounded tirzepatide. “We’re willing to kind of do anything to have this. It’s not just about looks; it’s about the opportunity it gives us to live our lives to the fullest.” 

Many patients and major trade groups question whether the shortage is truly resolved amid reports of people still struggling to find Eli Lilly’s drugs. 

Some medical professionals raised concerns about whether Eli Lilly can meet demand once more patients come off compounded tirzepatide and others start Zepbound for its newly approved use: obstructive sleep apnea. 

It’s unclear how many people are on compounded tirzepatide, but one trade group estimated in November that there are more than 200,000 prescriptions for compounded versions of its main rival — Novo Nordisk‘s weight-loss drug Wegovy — being filled each month. 

“In this current moment, I have confidence that the shortage is over,” said Dr. Shauna Levy, an obesity medicine specialist and medical director of the Tulane Bariatric Center in New Orleans. “Do I think the shortage is over forever? Probably not.” 

In a statement on Friday, Eli Lilly said the FDA’s decision “reflects the tireless work of our manufacturing and quality colleagues to safely expand our manufacturing capacity to bring these medicines to people who need them.” The company added that anyone marketing or selling “unapproved tirzepatide knockoffs must stop.”

Compounders face deadlines, with some exceptions

The FDA initially declared the tirzepatide shortage over in October. 

But a trade group called the Outsourcing Facilities Association sued days later, claiming the agency made its determination without proper notice and failed to account for continued supply disruptions. That lawsuit pushed the FDA to reconsider and allowed pharmacists to make compounded versions in the meantime. 

In its decision announced Thursday, the FDA concluded based on data from Eli Lilly, patients, providers, compounders, and other sources that “Lilly’s supply is currently meeting or exceeding demand and that, based on our best judgment, it will meet or exceed projected demand.”

The FDA is giving so-called 503A compounding pharmacies until Feb. 18 before it takes enforcement action that would put a halt to their work. The 503A pharmacies make compounded drugs according to individual prescriptions for a specific patient and are largely regulated by states rather than the FDA. 

Meanwhile, pharmacies manufacturing compounded drugs in bulk with or without prescriptions — known as 503B outsourcing facilities — get an additional month, with a deadline of March 19. They are regulated by FDA guidelines. 

An Eli Lilly & Co. Zepbound injection pen arranged in the Brooklyn borough of New York on March 28, 2024.

Shelby Knowles | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Those “off-ramp periods are appreciated” because it gives patients time to switch to brand-name tirzepatide, said Tenille Davis, chief advocacy officer for trade group Alliance for Pharmacy Compounding.

But the group’s members are still reporting that “there’s a real lack of availability” of tirzepatide, she said. That trade group represents compounding pharmacies and hybrid pharmacies that also dispense regular drug prescriptions.

Still, 503A pharmacies may be allowed to continue making compounded tirzepatide in certain situations under the law, Davis said. 

That includes when a prescriber determines that a compounded version with certain changes will produce a “significant difference” for a patient. For example, a patient may need a specialized dose or be allergic to the dye in a branded product. 

Davis said that means compounded tirzepatide won’t be completely eliminated in the U.S., but the scale of it will “certainly decrease.”

The legal battle between the FDA and the Outsourcing Facilities Association isn’t over yet, however. On Thursday, the FDA and OFA jointly said they will provide an update in court by Jan. 2 to address the “next steps in this litigation.” They also said if the trade group files a preliminary injunction over the next two weeks, the FDA will not take action against its members for continuing to make compounded tirzepatide until the court resolves the case.

That pending litigation further “adds to the confusion of the status of compounded tirzepatide after February and March,” said Dae Lee, a partner at law firm Frier Levitt who represents pharmacies, none of which were involved in the dispute with the FDA.

Patients look to alternatives

Amanda Bonello has been taking compounded tirzepatide and has launched a petition demanding the FDA support access to compounded GLP-1s.

Courtesy: Amanda Bonello

Many patients who rely on compounded tirzepatide are scrambling to ensure they can continue care. 

That includes Amanda Bonello, 36, an Iowa-based account manager who said she is prediabetic. Bonello said taking compounded tirzepatide over the last two months has helped her lose 26 pounds and normalized her blood sugar levels, allowing her to avoid a diabetes diagnosis. 

She said she “absolutely cannot” afford branded tirzepatide since her insurance does not cover it, so she will consider switching to compounded semaglutide. That is the active ingredient in Wegovy and its diabetes counterpart Ozempic, Novo Nordisk’s two GLP-1s that are still on the FDA’s drug shortage list. 

Many compounding pharmacies make unbranded versions of semaglutide, which has been on the U.S. market — and in short supply — for much longer than tirzepatide. But an end to the shortage may be imminent, with the FDA announcing in late October that all doses of semaglutide are available. 

“If compounded semaglutide goes away as well, then I will be screwed,” Bonello said. She has launched an online petition demanding that the FDA support access to compounded GLP-1s. The petition has gained more than 15,000 signatures in the past month.

Erin Hunt (right,) a patient who has been taking compounded tirzepatide, and her husband Brice.

Courtesy: Erin Hunt

Another patient, Erin Hunt, 31, a communications analyst based in Maryland, said she may eventually switch to the branded version of tirzepatide. 

Hunt started taking compounded tirzepatide in April after struggling to find supply of Zepbound, which she took for one month. It has helped her lose around 55 pounds, experience fewer symptoms from her chronic inflammatory conditions and pursue a healthier diet and exercise. She said she initially paid $300 per month for the compound drug and now pays $350 for a higher dose.

Hunt’s insurance does not cover Zepbound. But she qualifies for Eli Lilly’s savings card program, which allows commercially insured patients without coverage for Zepbound to buy a month’s supply for around $650. Under that program, patients whose commercial insurance plan covers Zepbound can pay as low as $25. 

“I am extremely concerned for what it’s going to cost,” Hunt said. “This medication has literally changed my life, and it’s probably going to benefit me to be on a maintenance dose for life.”

For Jill Skala, 49, a teacher in western Pennsylvania, the FDA’s decision means that she will lose a more affordable option after her insurance drops Zepbound coverage on Jan. 1. 

Her copay for Zepbound has been around $10 per month since she started the drug in March. Skala said she has lost 52 pounds and noticed “profound improvements” in her mental health, sleep and energy levels. She has stockpiled a three-month supply of Zepbound, she said, and will “do the best I can to maintain my weight loss” once that runs out.

“I don’t see myself continuing to get the branded version at this point unless there’s a pathway back through insurance or Eli Lilly drops the price,” Skala said. “I just paid off my student loans. I don’t want to start my medical debt problem here.”

Jill Skala has been taking branded Zepbound since March, but will soon lose insurance coverage for it.

Courtesy: Jill Skala

Other patients may turn to an underground community Reddit users call “the gray market”: People directly purchase powdered tirzepatide or semaglutide peptides for as little as $50 per month from certain vendors, including Chinese manufacturers, and mix that with sterile water at home, creating a solution they can inject under their skin. 

Reddit users say the community establishes protocols for third-party lab testing of peptides to verify their purity and promotes safe mixing and dosing practices. 

But Tulane’s Levy said the method “seems very dangerous,” noting that mixing homemade medications without proper training “could potentially have real consequences.” 

She said it “highlights people’s desperation to treat the disease of obesity, which is being inadequately met by our current insurance status” for drugs such as Zepbound. 

Continuing care

Some compounding pharmacies such as Strive Pharmacy are operating as usual pending more updates to the legal fight. Strive operates nine 503A pharmacies across the U.S., which offer compounded GLP-1s and other services. 

But Strive will largely stop making compounded tirzepatide by the February deadline if nothing further happens, according to Matthew Montes de Oca, the company’s chief clinical officer. He acknowledged that Strive could create compounded versions of the drug for specific prescriptions, such as adding glycine to help prevent muscle deterioration in a patient. 

Compounded tirzepatide with glycine is what Gina Wright’s doctor will prescribe for her so she can continue taking the unbranded version, which she gets from a different pharmacy. Wright, 58, a self-employed business consultant in Colorado who is prediabetic, said she is paying $225 for a five-milligram dose, which she began taking earlier this month. 

She is on her state Medicaid plan, which does not cover Zepbound, so she does not qualify for Eli Lilly’s savings card program. But Wright said she also has sleep apnea, so she is trying to get insurance to cover Zepbound for that purpose.

Gina Wright began taking compounded tirzepatide earlier this month.

Courtesy: Gina Wright

De Oca said compounding individual injectable GLP-1 prescriptions for specific patients will make it harder for Strive to ensure that all of its safety procedures such as stability studies are still in place. Strive typically tests its tirzepatide and semaglutide with a third-party analytical company and conducts a months-long “stability study” to guarantee the quality and safety of the product before creating batches of up to 250 vials, he noted. 

Dr. Mace Scott, the owner and medical director of Chronos Body Health Wellness, said the fate of compounded tirzepatide at his Louisiana-based medical spa will depend on the pharmacies he sources it from and “how they decide to move forward.” His spa relies on both 503A and 503B pharmacies, he said, so some patients may be able to continue compounded tirzepatide with a specialized prescription. 

Scott said he is trying to help some patients get insurance approval for branded tirzepatide. He is recommending that others switch to compounded semaglutide, which is what roughly 75% of Chronos patients are taking, he said. The spa has treated more than 10,000 patients with branded or compounded GLP-1 medications, according to its website.

“It’s kind of a tough road to traverse right now, so we’re trying to figure out what’s best on a patient-by-patient basis,” Scott told CNBC. 

The American Diabetes Association, a nonprofit organization that promotes diabetes research and advocacy, told CNBC it recommends against the use of compounded GLP-1s due to “ongoing concerns” about their safety, quality and efficacy.

It is difficult to discern the quality of the product and its distributor, which poses a potential risk to patients, Joshua Neumiller, the association’s president-elect for health care and education, said in a statement.

Neumiller also pointed to an FDA alert in July about cases of patients measuring and administering incorrect doses of compounded GLP-1s, some of which resulted in adverse events that required hospitalization. 

But Molly B., an interior designer based in New York who asked CNBC to omit her full last name, said compounded GLP-1s are her only option.

She said her insurance denied coverage for brand-name semaglutide twice before she started taking compounded tirzepatide in September. It has helped her lose 23 pounds, she said, and eliminated constant thoughts about food — a game changer for a patient suffering from polycystic ovary syndrome, a hormonal disorder that makes it difficult to lose weight. 

“I have never been able to lose this much weight on my own, and I’ve tried 100 times,” she said. “This has really changed my life, so I would hope that I can continue to get it the way I am now.”

Horse racing set for a resurgence within the U.S.

Horse race At the harness racing week on the Freehold Raceway in New Jersey: a reverse race with the sulky fixed in front of the horse – 1930.

Robert Sennecke | Ullstein Bild | Getty Images

America’s oldest horse racetrack is closing after running its last race on the final weekend of 2024. 

Freehold Raceway in New Jersey, co-owned by Penn Entertainment, tried for decades to land a casino but failed. Like many tracks around the nation, it grappled with declining attendance and revenue. It had been operating for more than 170 years.

“Unfortunately, the operations of the racetrack cannot continue under existing conditions, and we do not see a plausible way forward,” said Howard Bruno, the racetrack’s general manager, in a news release announcing the closure.

But industry insiders, investors and other enthusiasts believe horse racing in the United States could be poised for a resurgence — fueled by new investor interest, innovations in the sport and a boom in legalized online sports gambling. 

In 2023, the sport added more than $36 billion to the U.S. economy, supporting nearly half a million jobs, according to the American Horse Council. 

Horse-racing revenue comes from a variety of sources: tickets, hospitality, merchandise purchases at the track, licensing for TV or simulcast, sponsorships and gambling.  

Reliable estimates of global horse-racing revenues are hard to come by, experts say, in part because of the private nature of ownership and in part because of the wide variety of metrics used. Revenue estimates range from $44 billion to nearly 10 times that.

Multiple sources agree the sport could see compound annual growth of roughly 9% in the years ahead.

Growth in gambling

No catalyst for the sport’s growth is more crucial at the moment than the revenue that comes from gambling. 

The handle, or the amount of money wagered on horse races, funds the purses, or the prize money, awarded to winning horses. So does the casino-style gambling at facilities associated with race tracks.

For example, Resorts World New York City, which operates video lottery terminals, is contractually obligated to turn over 12% of its net win to the New York Racing Authority, or NYRA. Patrick McKenna, NYRA’s vice president for communications, said that currently amounts to about $120 million annually. Of that total, $60 million goes toward purses, $40 million goes to capital improvements, and $20 million funds operations.

When the size of the purse grows it attracts higher quality horses, and higher quality horses attract more interest in the sport.   

In 2022, $12 billion was wagered on horse races, marking a new record, according to an analysis by the New York Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association, or NYTHA. The total purse money awarded that year also set a new record, at $1.25 billion.  

Fans place bets prior to the Belmont Stakes at Belmont Park in Elmont, New York, June 7, 2014.

Streeter Lecka | Getty Images

Growth in sportsbooks as well as the increased access Americans now have to legalized, online sports wagering is fueling optimism for horse racing’s resurgence. New ways to bet on horse racing means a new generation of sports enthusiasts is getting exposure to the sport. 

FanDuel, the nation’s leading sportsbook by market share, partnered with the Kentucky Derby for a second year in 2024. The company told CNBC that the volume of bets on Derby day hit the same level as Super Bowl gambling in the same year.

Crown jewel

The Kentucky Derby is the crown jewel of Churchill Downs — the most significant pure-play, publicly traded company focused on horse racing. 

The company announced a significant increase in adjusted EBITDA — earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization — during Derby Week in 2024, with critical sponsorships from companies that wanted to align themselves with the prestige event.

The company says record wagering numbers suggest the betting audience is not only growing but becoming increasingly engaged as they learn the sport, especially on the mobile platforms favored by a younger demographic.

“Our operational strategies present a model for other racing events to follow. Overall, the Kentucky Derby is not just a standalone event but a blueprint for the future of horse racing,” said CEO Bill Carstanjen.

Hall of Fame horse trainer Bob Baffert said the Kentucky Derby is special because it’s a bucket-list race: “It’s an Instagram moment for everybody. Everybody goes. They’re taking their selfies: ‘I’m here. I’m here at the biggest party.'”

But the high-profile Triple Crown races and the Breeders Cup may be outliers — a kind of World Series in the horse-racing schedule that otherwise is filled with everyday competitions that draw only a smattering of fans. 

Interest in more ordinary races has been waning for decades.

The amount of money wagered on pari-mutuel racing — where bettors gamble against other bettors and the odds constantly change ahead of the race — has declined by about 55% since 2000, when adjusted for inflation, according to the Paulick Report, a website about the horse-racing industry. 

Also, over the past two decades the number of owners, horses and trainers in the U.S. has plummeted, according to the NYTHA researchers. They concluded that in 2022 horse racing had “on most days been reduced to a niche market, albeit with a highly interested core audience.” 

Baffert told CNBC he believes horse racing needs more high-profile events with big purses to drum up buzz. And, like baseball, it needs superstars to draw in weekday audiences. 

Baffert, who is only the second trainer ever to have two Triple Crown winners, may be horse racing’s best-known character. But controversy in recent years has overshadowed his success.

Baffert was suspended for three years from competing at Churchill Downs after a horse he’d trained, Medina Spirit, won the Kentucky Derby in 2021 but tested positive for an illegal anti-inflammatory drug and was disqualified.

This summer, Churchill Downs lifted its suspension of Baffert after he publicly took responsibility for the failed drug test.  

Baffert returned to the storied racetrack the day before Thanksgiving, with a 2-year-old horse named Barnes that had never raced before but had fetched an impressive $3.2 million at an auction in Saratoga, New York, from now-owner Zedan Racing Stables.

The median price to purchase a race horse is about $30,000, according to BloodHorse, a publication for owners and breeders that tracks sales and the state of the market.

Barnes won by a nose in his debut.  

Wall Street funds

Some well-known Wall Street names have earned a reputation for spotting — or creating — opportunities in horse racing.

Danny Moses, a trader made famous in “The Big Short,” is a sport enthusiast, avid gambler and investor in race horses. And though he’s known for his short calls, he said he’s long on horses.

“I think the value of horses are going to go up,” Moses said, pointing to the bigger payouts and purses brought in by the boom in legalized online sports gambling.

Mystik Dan #3, ridden by jockey Brian J. Hernandez Jr. (R), crosses the finish line ahead of Sierra Leone #2, ridden by jockey Tyler Gaffalione and Forever Young, ridden by jockey Ryusei Sakai to win the 150th running of the Kentucky Derby at Churchill Downs on May 04, 2024 in Louisville, Kentucky. 

Michael Reaves | Getty Images

Moses is one of 14 in an elite group of investors in Starlight Racing, which currently owns 26 race horses. It’s headed by former hedge funder Jack Wolf, and it produced 2018 Triple Crown winner Justify and 2020 Derby and Breeders Cup winner Authentic, both trained by Baffert.

Over a little more than two decades, Starlight-owned horses have finished in the money more than 50% of the time, raking in more than $64 million in total purse money. 

Wolf said his experience in hedge funds helped him to establish an innovative model to invest in horses, where all partners share in the potential upside for a group of horses. He said investors need to factor in the experience and the enjoyment of the sport into their expectations for return on investment.

“We’ve been around the world with our partnership. That’s what they’re investing in,” Wolf said. As far as concrete financial returns go, he said, “We’ve been successful some years, and some years we haven’t been. It’s a very tough business, a very tough way to make a return on your money, but it can be done.”

Wolf is now looking at the races themselves. In 2017 he was CEO of the Pegasus World Cup at Gulfstream Park in Florida. The race set a new model: Owners paid $1 million each for a spot in the race, which they could use, sell or lease.

The race’s $12 million purse was the richest in the world. 

Though the Pegasus has reverted to a traditional race model since then, Australia has embraced the “gate race” or “slot race” structure, with some of the highest purses globally.   

And Moses is lobbying for more U.S. races to follow the unusual model, pitching racetracks such as Monmouth, Santa Anita and others.

Ramping up regulation

There remains a thorny problem for the U.S. horse-racing industry: It’s long been seen as the Wild West as far as regulations and oversight of horse welfare are concerned, according to Lisa Lazarus, CEO of the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority, or HISA. The organization was established by the Federal Trade Commission to oversee the integrity of horse racing across state lines and in different racing facilities. 

Investors don’t want their money attached to potential rules or ethics issues, Lazarus told CNBC.  

“By prioritizing consistent and transparent practices, HISA aims to reassure fans and the public that horse racing operates with integrity and safety at its core,” Lazarus told CNBC. “This commitment not only fosters trust but also creates an environment where innovation can thrive, attracting new owners, participants, and fans.”

But powerhouse operators Churchill Downs and the New York Racing Association, or NYRA, are suing HISA over fees.  

In a statement to CNBC, NYRA insisted it’s broadly supportive of HISA’s mission but is protesting “unlawful, excessive and disproportionate financial assessments.”

Lazarus said that in the end, HISA’s oversight and regulation will fuel more investment — similar to that of sports gambling or cryptocurrency — because the rules and legality are clearer. 

In 2020, racing horse deaths in the U.S. amounted to 1.41 per 1,000 race starts, according to HISA, which launched a track safety program in July 2022. After the agency standardized doping regulations and enforcement, horse deaths fell to an estimated 0.9 per 1,000 race starts in 2024.

It was the first time the U.S. has achieved anything below 1 in the metric and puts it on par with death rates in the United Kingdom, Japan and Australia, according to Lazarus.

Owners and trainers hope that will assuage concerns by lawmakers and regulators and discourage the kind of backlash that would hinder growth of the sport. 

New age of racing

Even if the sport can overcome the widespread perception of its treatment of horses, racetrack facilities are in desperate need of an overhaul. Outdated facilities discourage fans from attending. 

“They don’t want to go to a racing facility that’s been there since the 1960s with old infrastructure, with old bathrooms,” said Donna Brothers, NBC Sports racing analyst and commentator.

Churchill Downs is spending $300 million on improvements to its paddock and grandstand. Belmont Park is undergoing a $500 million renovation, funded by a loan from New York state. And Maryland’s legislature in April approved $400 million to overhaul Pimlico, home of the Preakness Stakes.  

The field of jockeys and horses start the 155th running of the Belmont Stakes at Saratoga Race Course on June 08, 2024 in Saratoga Springs, New York. 

Al Bello | Getty Images

Brothers said the industry is going to have to embrace new technology, such as mobile apps, to go along with the physical improvements. 

Dennis Drazin, CEO and chairman of Monmouth Park Racetrack and Sports Book, said the sport’s true potential can only be realized through multiple revenue streams. 

“Racetracks will have to include gaming, entertainment, fan experience and innovation in their formula for success,” Drazin said.

NYRA, for one, is seeing a major boost from expanded national television coverage of its races. Fox Sports, a minority equity owner in NYRA Bets, airs 1,000 hours of horse racing throughout the year. NYRA said that boosted total wagers on its online platform 127%, from $306 million in 2016 to $696 million in 2023.

FanDuel bought racing broadcaster TVG and has become a leading operator in horse racing alongside NYRA and Churchill Downs’ TwinSpires, which licenses its gambling operations to other sportsbooks including FanDuel and DraftKings. 

DraftKings became a naming sponsor for the 2024 Travers Stakes in Saratoga. 

Despite the Freehold Raceway closure, Penn Entertainment said in a statement it’s looking to expand gaming tied to horse racing.

“In those states where commercial gaming is not yet approved at the racetracks, such as Texas, we continue to educate lawmakers on the success we’ve seen,” said Eric Schippers, senior vice president of public affairs for Penn. “Gaming has helped to revitalize racing, driving higher purses, enhanced breeding programs and the preservation of family farms and open space.”

Jimmy Carter Outlived One Of His Obituary Writers

Jimmy Carter was not only the longest living ex-president in history, but he lived so long that he outlived one of his New York Times obituary writers.

This was the NYT byline on Carter’s obituary, “By Peter Baker and Roy Reed
Peter Baker is the chief White House correspondent for The Times; Roy Reed, who died in 2017, was a Times national correspondent who for many years covered the South.”

Jimmy Carter outlived one of his obituary writers by seven years. Of all the amazing facts about Carter’s longevity, that might be one of the most amazing.

Carter is being widely and warmly remembered in death in a way that he was not for much of his post-presidential life. The fact that Carter’s name had become shorthand for failed one-term president in many circles was never fair or deserved.

There are plenty of presidents who were elected to two terms that history regards as failures. George W. Bush is a name that springs to mind right away, and it would not be surprising if Donald Trump

someday joined that list well.

Jimmy Carter lived an amazing life that was dedicated to decency and service to others. As America is about to face the reality of a government run by billionaires for billionaires, the legacy of Jimmy Carter may only grow and be more fondly reemembered.

Jason is the managing editor. He is also a White House Press Pool and a Congressional correspondent for PoliticusUSA. Jason has a Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science. His graduate work focused on public policy, with a specialization in social reform movements.

Awards and  Professional Memberships

Member of the Society of Professional Journalists and The American Political Science Association

Jason EasleyLatest posts by Jason Easley (see all)