Trump’s Tremendous Bowl Interview Was A Complete Catastrophe

PoliticusUSA bends the knee to no person or party. We are ad-free and corporate-free because of your support. Please support us by becoming a subscriber.

Donald Trump mostly hides on Fox News or speaks to the White House Press Corps because they have implicitly agreed not to ask difficult questions in exchange for access to the president.

The first blunt truth about Donald Trump’s Super Bowl interview is that if the Super Bowl was on a different network, Trump would not have done the interview.

Trump he would get the cuddly treatment from Fox News and golfing buddy Bret Baier, and he certainly did.

Video:

Baier asked the tough questions of Trump about his dancing and sports and compared the first two weeks of his administration to a no-huddle offense. Baier asked Trump if he trusted Elon Musk and allowed Trump to complain because the courts said that Musk can’t have access to everyone’s private data.

The interview did contain one relevant question.

Baier asked Trump, “ If all goes to plan, when do you think families will be able to feel prices going down, groceries, energy, or are you kind of saying to them, hang on, inflation may get worse until it gets better?”

Trump answered, “ No, I think we’re going to become a rich nation. Look, we’re not that rich right now. We owe 36 trillion dollars. That’s because we let all these nations take advantage of us. Same thing, like 200 billion with Canada, we owe 300, we have a deficit with Mexico of 350 billion dollars. I’m not going to do that.”

The US trade deficit with Canada is the second smallest of any trading partner. The US trade deficit with Canada was $300 billion, but $45 billion. In fact, Canada is America’s biggest export market, so a trade war with Canada would be a nightmare for the United States.

Fox News tried to save the interview with lots of editing of Trump’s answers, but it was still a disaster of nonsense, unanswered questions, and rambling misinformation.

Donald Trump isn’t well, and it was cute when he tried to pretend like he was in charge of Elon Musk and giving Musk instructions. It is clear that the scam Trump and Musk are running is going to involve a bogus DOGE report on fraud and waste that Republicans are going to try to use to justify massive spending cuts to pay for their tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations.

Just to summarize, Trump thinks Canada should become a state, isn’t going to do anything about grocery prices, and claims that the American people elected him so Elon Musk could spy on them.

The best way to defeat Trump and the radical right-wingers pulling his strings is to let him keep telling the American people that he is going to do nothing for them.

What did you think of Trump’s Super Bowl interview? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Leave a comment

That is the No. 1 purpose the rich splurge on personal jet journey

Few things say “luxury” like private jet travel. 

Whether you have your own plane or pay thousands of dollars per hour for access to a private aircraft through a service like Flexjet, the price of avoiding traveling with the masses is steep.

Kenn Ricci has turned the luxury of flying private into a successful entrepreneurial career. Once a pilot himself, Ricci spent years flying A-listers like Elton John and Bruce Springsteen and even piloted Bill Clinton’s plane during his presidential campaign.

As the chairman of Flexjet, the nation’s second-largest commercial private jet operator, Ricci has made it his mission to make sure that the very wealthy are getting their money’s worth when they step onto one of the 600 to 900 flights his company operates daily.

“Why do people pay $80,000 to go to London when they could fly first class or premiere for $12,000 or $15,000?” he asks. 

The answer, Ricci says, is because there’s one thing that the very-wealthy value above all else: Time. 

‘Whatever you want, we’ll do that for you’

While the privacy, luxury and convenience of private air travel is a huge draw, Ricci says the real selling point is the peace of mind that tens of thousands of dollars can buy you on your trip. 

“Where can you buy time? Where can you buy less stress?” he says. “That’s what they’re really paying for.”

Even flying first class, travelers have to deal with airport traffic and TSA lines. When they get to their gate, their flight could experience a delay or be canceled outright. 

When you’re paying up to $10,000 per hour flying private, Ricci says, that stress is taken off of your plate. 

Why do people pay $80,000 to go to London when they could fly first class or premiere for $12,000 or $15,000?

Kenn Ricci

Chairman, Flexjet

“When our plane breaks, or if the weather’s bad, we feel bad for the customer. We find alternatives. We solve their problem,” he says. “If you’re on an airline and the plane is canceled, you have to solve your own problem. They’re paying for the removal of the hassle and for the gaining of time.” 

“We want your problem solved,” he adds. “I’ll say ‘What will make you happy? Whatever you want, we’ll do that for you.'”

Sometimes that problem solving means finding alternative travel arrangements. For particularly disgruntled customers, that might mean Flexjet offers to comp the hefty price tag of their trip as an apology for the inconvenience. 

“This is what customers like about us: If we fail you, we’re apologetic,” he says. “We didn’t meet the standard, we didn’t meet your expectation. So they’re getting attention, and that makes the travel experience different than when you have to slog your way through it.”

Still, Ricci doesn’t recommend that his clients break the bank to fly private no matter what. In fact, he often tells customers that they should be spending no more than 10% of their discretionary income on his offerings.

“I pride myself on not making you do something that wouldn’t be in your interest,” he says. “If you have disposable income of a million dollars, you’re nuts if you’re spending more than $100,000 a year on this asset.” 

Want to up your AI skills and be more productive? Take CNBC’s new online course How to Use AI to Be More Successful at Work. Expert instructors will teach you how to get started, practical uses, tips for effective prompt-writing, and mistakes to avoid. Sign up now and use coupon code EARLYBIRD for an introductory discount of 30% off $67 (+ taxes and fees) through February 11, 2025.

Plus, sign up for CNBC Make It’s newsletter to get tips and tricks for success at work, with money and in life.

Hims & Hers faces lawmaker scrutiny over ‘deceptive’ Tremendous Bowl advert

Hims & Hers is facing scrutiny from lawmakers over an advertisement for its weight loss offerings that’s slated to run during the Super Bowl on Sunday.

Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Roger Marshall, R-Kan., wrote a letter to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Friday expressing concerns over an “upcoming advertisement” that “risks misleading patients by omitting any safety or side effect information when promoting a specific type of weight loss medication.”

The Hims & Hers ad, which the company released online in late January, is called “Sick of the System” and sharply criticizes the $160 billion weight loss industry. It shows visuals of existing weight loss medications known as GLP-1s, including injection pens that look like Novo Nordisk’s blockbuster diabetes drug Ozempic.

The ad claims those drugs are “priced for profits, not patients” and points to Hims & Hers’ weight loss medications as “affordable” and “doctor-trusted” alternatives.

“We are complying with existing law and are happy to continue working with Congress and the new Administration to fix the broken health system and ensure that patients have choices for quality, safe, and affordable healthcare,” a Hims & Hers spokesperson told CNBC in a statement.

The senators do not mention Hims & Hers by name in their letter, but they do reference some of the visuals in the ad, including “imagery of an injection pen with distinctive characteristics reflective of an existing brand-name medication.”

“Nowhere in this promotion is there any side effect disclosure, risk, or safety information as would be typically required in a pharmaceutical advertisement,” the senators wrote. “Further, for only three seconds during the minute-long commercial does the screen flash in small, barely legible font, that these products are not FDA-approved.”

Scott Brunner, CEO of the Alliance for Pharmacy Compounding, said Friday that Hims & Hers’ ad is consistent with “help-seeking” pharmaceutical advertising.

“Hims’ Super Bowl ad does not promote a specific drug or medication and therefore is not required to provide information about side effects or risks,” Brunner said in a statement. “Instead, it encouraged viewers to consult with a healthcare provider, which aligns with the FTC’s guidelines for non-specific, ‘help-seeking’ advertisements.”

Hims & Hers began offering compounded semaglutide through its platform in May after launching a new weight loss program in late 2023. Semaglutide is the active ingredient in Ozempic and Wegovy, which can each cost around $1,000 a month without insurance.

Shares of Hims & Hers jumped more than 170% last year, thanks to soaring demand for GLP-1s. They closed up 5% on Friday, lifting the company’s market cap to about $9.5 billion.

Compounded GLP-1s are typically much cheaper and can serve as an alternative for patients who are navigating complex supply hurdles and spotty insurance coverage. Hims & Hers sells compounded semaglutide for under $200 a month.

The FDA doesn’t review the safety and efficacy of compounded products, which are custom-made alternatives to brand-name drugs designed to meet a specific patient’s needs. Compounded products can also be produced when brand-name treatments are in shortage.

Semaglutide is currently in shortage, according to the FDA.

Durbin and Marshall said advertisements for brand-name GLP-1 medications include “significant risk disclosures to patients about side effects and contraindications, including warnings about potential gallbladder, pancreas, vomiting, diarrhea, and other implications.”

A release on Durbin’s website says that the ad in question appears to exploit a loophole “regarding promotions of compounded drugs by telehealth companies.”

The senators said they believe the FDA may have the authority to take enforcement actions against marketing that could mislead patients, and they plan to introduce new legislation to address regulatory loopholes.

WATCH: New study reveals why patients stop taking GLP-1 obesity drugs

E.l.f. Magnificence (ELF) earnings Q3 2025

E.l.f. Beauty on Thursday cut its full-year guidance after seeing a 36% drop in profits and “softer than expected” sales trends in January, marking a rare downturn for one of beauty’s hottest brands. 

The cosmetics company reported holiday sales that were higher than expected but profits that narrowly missed estimates, another rare miss for the retailer. 

Shares of E.l.f. fell more than 20% in extended trading Thursday.

Here’s how E.l.f. did in its fiscal third quarter compared with what Wall Street was anticipating, based on a survey of analysts by LSEG:

  • Earnings per share: 74 cents adjusted vs. 75 cents expected
  • Revenue: $355 million vs. $330 million expected

The company’s reported net income for the three-month period that ended Dec. 31 was $17.3 million, or 30 cents per share, compared with $26.9 million, or 46 cents per share, a year earlier. Excluding one-time items, including stock-based compensation and expenses associated with its acquisition of Naturium, E.l.f. posted adjusted earnings of 74 cents per share. 

Sales rose to $355 million, up about 31% from $271 million a year earlier.

For the company’s full fiscal year, which only has one quarter remaining, E.l.f. issued guidance that came in below Wall Street expectations. The retailer is now expecting sales of between $1.3 billion and $1.31 billion, below estimates of $1.34 billion, according to StreetAccount. It had previously expected sales to be between $1.32 billion and $1.34 billion. 

E.l.f. is also now expecting adjusted earnings per share of between $3.27 and $3.32, far below StreetAccount estimates of $3.54. E.l.f. had previously expected full-year earnings of between $3.47 and $3.53. 

The company’s implied guidance for its current quarter looks even more rough. Based on its full-year outlook and actual figures from the first three quarters, E.l.f. could see earnings per share of between 66 cents and 71 cents during its current quarter, far below expectations of 97 cents, according to a CNBC analysis and estimates from LSEG. 

In an interview with CNBC, CEO Tarang Amin shrugged off concerns that there were larger issues at the company and instead pointed to an overall slowdown in the beauty category, tough prior-year comparisons and recent product launches that did not perform as well as previous new items. 

When it comes to the overall category, Amin said mass cosmetics declined 5% in January and the company suspects that was driven by two factors: a hangover from holiday discounting and a slowdown in “social commentary,” or fewer people talking about beauty online, which can drive cosmetics sales. 

“One, [with] the LA wildfires, people I think didn’t want to be tone deaf with posting a lot of things while that devastation went on. The second is, there was a lot of uncertainty around TikTok. I feel like the only things people were posting on TikTok was whether it was going to stay open or shut down,” said Amin. “Whatever the reason may be, that social commentary was way down.”

Amin also weighed in on new tariffs against China and how the company is preparing. About 80% of its supply chain is in the region.

Amin said it is too early to say whether E.l.f. will raise prices to offset the effect to profits, but the new 10% duties are better than what the company was bracing for.

Over the past couple of years, E.l.f. has been one of the fastest-growing brands in beauty, winning over shoppers young and old with its viral marketing, low prices and ability to offer high-quality, more-affordable “dupes” of prestige products.

While the brand is still growing and says it is still outpacing the overall category, that pace of growth is starting to slow down and recent product launches have not boosted sales in the same way they did in the past. 

Amin said the company prefers to take a “prudent” approach to guidance and still considers it a win that E.l.f. is outperforming the overall category.

He said the company is using the profits it generates to invest in improvements to inventory management programs, infrastructure and international expansion.

Trump sued over purge at NLRB

U.S. President Donald Trump looks on as he signs an executive order in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, U.S., Jan. 31, 2025. 

Carlos Barria | Reuters

The former chair of the National Labor Relations Board in a new lawsuit Wednesday accused President Donald Trump of breaking the law when he fired her from the agency last week.

Lawyers for Gwynne Wilcox argue that she was removed from her post for a “political purpose” in a manner that violates the 90-year-old statute that established the NLRB.

Her lawsuit in Washington, D.C., federal court seeks an order reinstating her on the board and declaring that her firing was unlawful.

Created by Congress to enforce U.S. labor laws, NLRB is an independent agency with board members who are insulated from arbitrary removal. No member of the NLRB had ever been fired by a president, until Wilcox.

On Trump’s first day in office, he replaced Wilcox as the chair with another board member. A week later, both Wilcox and the NLRB’s top lawyer, Jennifer Abruzzo, were fired in a “late-night email,” according to the suit.

That email said she was being fired because the “heads of agencies within the Executive Branch must share the objectives of [Trump’s] administration.” Wilcox was appointed by former President Joe Biden, a Democrat.

The lawsuit calls this “a blatantly political purpose that flies in the face of the NLRB’s independent status.”

Wilcox argues that her firing did more than just violate the agency’s independence.

It effectively forced “an immediate and indefinite halt” to all of the NLRB’s regulatory activity.

At the time of Wilcox’s firing, there were already two vacancies on the five-member NLRB panel. Wilcox’s ouster leaves just two remaining members on the board, Marvin Kaplan and David Prouty.

With only two out of the five board seats filled, the NLRB does not meet the three-member threshold that it requires to continue operating.

Without a quorum of three, “no mechanism remains for resolving labor disputes” at NLRB, Wilcox’s lawsuit said.

This could be a positive development for the group of companies, including Elon Musk’s SpaceX, Amazon and other giants, that have argued in a slew of lawsuits that the labor board’s structure is unconstitutional.

A vocal opponent of labor unions, Musk was Trump’s largest campaign donor. The billionaire currently serves as a “special government employee” and the leader of Trump’s anti-bureaucracy effort, known as DOGE.

Musk and his lieutenants at DOGE are carrying out an unprecedented effort to reduce federal spending, moving through agencies and personnel offices and recommending that thousands of civil servants be reclassified, and in some cases, fired.

 “We spent the weekend feeding U.S.A.I.D. into the wood chipper,” Musk wrote on X Monday, referring to the U.S. Agency for International Development.

There is currently no record of DOGE members visiting the NLRB or contacting the agency. The NLRB declined to comment on Wilcox’s suit.

Read more CNBC politics coverage

Wilcox’s lawsuit also sets up a challenge over the extent of Trump’s power, as he and his aides, including Musk, rapidly attempt to unilaterally reshape and reduce the size of the federal government.

“The President’s action against Ms. Wilcox is part of a string of openly illegal firings in the early days of the second Trump administration that are apparently designed to test Congress’s power to create independent agencies like the Board,” her attorneys wrote in the suit.

They added that Wilcox is aware that “if no challenge is made, the President will have effectively succeeded” in defanging the protections of the longstanding labor law, “and, by extension, that of other independent agencies.”

Wilcox was sworn in as an NLRB member in August 2021, and was confirmed by the Senate in September 2023 for a second five-year term. On Dec. 17, Biden designated Wilcox chair of the board.

The lawsuit also noted that Wilcox was the “the first Black woman to serve on the Board.”

The National Labor Relations Act of 1935 specifies that the president can only remove the agency’s board members in cases of “neglect of duty or malfeasance in office,” and only after that member receives a “notice and hearing.”

Wilcox never received a notice and hearing, according to her lawsuit. And instead of identifying any neglect or malfeasance by Wilcox, the email noticing her removal allegedly cited Trump’s view that “heads of agencies within the Executive Branch must share the objectives of [his] administration.”

Papoose Raps Throughout Claressa Shields’ Boxing Ring Stroll-Up

IKDR! Roommates, this past weekend, Papoose stepped into the spotlight with his support for Claressa Shields! He was front and center for his boo leading up to her highly-anticipated match with Danielle Perkins. After securing the W, she thanked Pap for being by her side!

RELATED: Claressa Shields Shares Message About “Upgrading” Along With Photos In High-Slit Dress

Footage released on Sunday (Feb. 2) shows Pap and Shields arriving at her weigh-in together. She later reposted a clip of them at the event with the caption, “Very supportive, very demure.” 

He later performed a rap performance as Claressa Shields made her way to the ring against Perkins. According to the video, the crowd was rocking, but the boxer was seemingly feeling her intro the most! She had a huge smile while her man was on the mic! Another video shows them walking with her arm cuffed with his.

What Tea With Papoose, Claressa Shields & Remy Ma? 

All of the public unity aside, Papoose has yet to express what’s REALLY tea with Claressa. Is it giving serious or causal dating? We’ll have to wait and see. 

But here’s what we DO know! The undisputed heavyweight champion and Papoose have been an item in the public eye since early December. Days before Christmas, Remy Ma exposed their situationship, including their private texts. After a series of shady exchanges, the drama died down by the time 2025 rolled around. Remy Ma appears to be boo’ed up with Eazy E–the same battle rapper she faced cheating allegations over last year.

Eazy The Block Captain coming through with those bars as he asks Remy Ma to confirm her love for him. ✍🏾: #TSRStaffJW pic.twitter.com/dt5gWAmzQ7

— TheShadeRoom (@TheShadeRoom) January 6, 2025

Ironically, the text messages Remy released saw Claressa allegedly asking Papoose to be more communicative. Now, Remy Ma’s estranged husband is playing his “ride-or-die” role to another strong, Black woman!

RELATED: That’s Bae! Social Media Goes IN After Papoose Pops Out With Claressa Shields At Her Weigh-In (VIDEO)

What Do You Think Roomies?

Reid Hoffman launches Manas AI, a brand new drug discovery startup

Reid Hoffman, Partner at Greylock and co-founder LinkedIn, speaks during the WSJ Tech Live conference hosted by the Wall Street Journal at the Montage Laguna Beach in Laguna Beach, California, on October 21, 2024.

Frederic J. Brown | Afp | Getty Images

LinkedIn co-founder and venture capitalist Reid Hoffman became a billionaire from his business social-working company, and has made lucrative bets on companies including Airbnb and Zynga while also backing nuclear fusion startup Helion Energy.

Now Hoffman is diving into the health care, which he describes as “wondrous and terrifying,” with his latest startup, Manas AI. 

Hoffman and Dr. Siddhartha Mukherjee, an oncologist and Pulitzer Prize-winning author, unveiled the company on Monday. Manas will use artificial intelligence to try and accelerate the drug discovery process, starting with new treatments for aggressive cancers like prostate cancer, lymphoma and triple-negative breast cancer. 

Developing new drugs is traditionally a costly and complex process. It can take more than 10 years and cost billions of dollars to develop a single medication, according to a report from Deloitte. Manas said it will use its proprietary chemical libraries and AI-powered filters to identify drug candidates more quickly, ideally reducing the decades-long discovery process to just a few years.

“Most people have had friends, family members, etc., who’ve died from cancer or had serious cancer problems,” Hoffman told CNBC in an interview this week. “If we can make a huge difference on this, and this is the kind of thing that AI can make a huge difference in, it’s the kind of reason why AI can be great for humanity.”

Manas raised $24.6 million in seed funding, led by General Catalyst and Hoffman with participation from Greylock, where he is a partner. Hoffman has been deep in AI in recent years. He was an early investor in OpenAI, when the project was still a nonprofit, and he helped start Inflection AI along with DeepMind co-founder Mustafa Suleyman. Last year, Suleyman joined Microsoft, where Hoffman is a board member, as CEO of a new unit called Microsoft AI. Several Inflection employees joined him.

Manas has also inked a partnership with Microsoft, and will leverage its Azure cloud-computing platform. Hoffman, who sold LinkedIn to Microsoft for $27 billion, said Manas is deploying several additional tools from Microsoft as well, including some that are not generally available to the public yet. 

Hoffman has been working with Mukherjee to create Manas for about a year, though the process picked up steam in the last couple months. Hoffman said the team felt ready to publicly share its ambitions this week since its baseline, foundational resources are in order. 

‘Totally delighted’ to see competition

The company has a long road ahead, and the drug discovery market is very competitive. Other startups along with major pharmaceutical companies like Eli Lilly, Pfizer and Merck, are also exploring how to leverage AI to accelerate drug research and development.  

Hoffman said he feels confident in Manas’s approach, though he would be “totally delighted” to see multiple companies flourish. 

“We also bring the thing that a startup usually brings, which is a willingness to go very hard, abandon things quickly that aren’t working,” he said. “Live like this week matters, and the result of this week matters.” 

Following Manas’s launch on Monday, five different potential strategic partners have already approached the company, Hoffman said.  

Hoffman said the company is in “build quickly” and “learn and deploy” mode. One of its early initiatives is called Project Cosmos, which is an effort to map out the fundamental rules of drug binding, according to the company’s website. Hoffman declined to share any additional details about the project. 

Manas currently has just four employees – including Hoffman and Mukherjee – but Hoffman said it will grow. He’s been acting as the company’s “AI guy” while Mukherjee serves as the “bio guy,” he said. Ultimately, Manas is about melding the two fields.  

“It isn’t just the best of science and it isn’t just the best of AI, because either of those two are insufficient,” Hoffman said. “You need to put those two together.”

As the AI guy, Hoffman was paying close attention this week to the sudden emergence of China’s DeepSeek in the U.S.

DeepSeek began generating buzz in January, when the startup released its open-source reasoning model R1, which rivals OpenAI’s o1. The model was reportedly developed at a fraction of the cost of rival models by OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and others.

Hoffman said that while DeepSeek might encourage American companies to pick up the pace and share their plans sooner, the new revelations don’t suggest that large models are a bad investment.

“The competition game is on,” he said, “But I don’t think it’s the ‘Oh my God, we’re losing!’ as American technology.”

WATCH: LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman on DeepSeek

LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman: DeepSeek AI proves this is now a 'game-on competition' with China

Trump tariffs take intention at commerce loophole utilized by Temu, Shein

Shein and Temu icons are seen displayed on a phone screen in this illustration photo taken in Krakow, Poland on August 27, 2024. 

Jakub Porzycki | Nurphoto | Getty Images

President Donald Trump’s tariffs against China, Canada and Mexico target a trade provision that helped fuel the explosive growth of budget online retailers, including Temu and Shein.

Trump on Saturday signed executive orders imposing tariffs on the country’s top three trading partners. Goods imported from Canada and Mexico will be slapped with a 25% tariff, while goods from China will be charged a 10% tax. Energy resources from Canada will have a lower 10% tariff. The duties are expected to take effect on Tuesday.

The orders against China, Canada and Mexico all halt a trade exemption, known as “de minimis,” which allows exporters to ship packages worth less than $800 into the U.S. duty free.

The de minimis provision has existed since the 1930s, but its use has come under increasing scrutiny in recent years. The Biden administration took steps last September to curb the “overuse and abuse” of de minimis, arguing it has helped Chinese e-commerce companies undercut competitors with lower prices. Officials have also argued that de minimis shipments are “subject to minimal documentation and inspection,” raising product safety concerns.

The U.S. processed more than 1.3 billion de minimis shipments in 2024, according to data from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency. That’s up from 139 million a year in 2015, the CBP said.

The loophole has enabled low-cost e-commerce companies like PDD Holdings-owned Temu, Shein, and Alibaba‘s AliExpress, which all have links to China, to offer a virtual smorgasbord of cheap apparel, household items and electronics, such as $15 smartwatches and $3 shoes.

Shein and Temu have gone on a digital marketing blitz over the last few years in an attempt to lure more deal-hungry shoppers. Temu in 2024 vaulted to the top of Apple’s list of the most downloaded free apps in the U.S. for the second year in a row, while Shein came in at number 12.

Representatives from Temu, Shein and Alibaba didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. Temu has previously denied that its growth is dependent upon de minimis.

Shein previously told CNBC that import compliance is a “top priority.” Shein’s executive chairman, Donald Tang, has also said he supports efforts to reform de minimis, saying it needs a “complete makeover.”

Their popularity in the U.S. prompted Amazon to launch its own bargain outlet, called Haul, last year that allows third-party sellers to ship goods to consumers directly from China. Amazon reportedly relies on the de minimis trade rule to import items sold on Haul to bypass tariffs, The Information reported, citing people familiar with the program. An Amazon spokesperson didn’t immediately respond to CNBC for a request for comment.

Amazon, eBay and Etsy could stand to benefit from the Trump administration’s clampdown on the de minimis loophole. The companies operate online marketplaces that let third-party sellers market wares directly to consumers, competing directly with Temu and Shein.

Amazon has long connected Chinese manufacturers to American shoppers through its sprawling third-party marketplace. The marketplace is a key component of Amazon’s retail strategy, accounting for about 60% of products sold on the site. Amazon also generates fees by providing fulfillment, shipping, account support and advertising services to sellers.

China-based merchants have made up a sizable contingent of Amazon’s marketplace for many years, though the company acknowledged for the first time in 2023 that they account for a “significant portion.” By some estimates, they outnumber American sellers on the platform, according to data from Marketplace Pulse.

Temu and Shein have also expanded their strategies as the de minimis loophole came under threat. Last year, Temu began onboarding Chinese sellers to its site that have inventory at U.S. warehouses, allowing it to ship packages faster to American shoppers, according to The Information. Shein has also opened distribution centers and a supply chain hub in the U.S.

WATCH: Amazon Haul takes on Temu to bring shoppers cheap goods from China

Trump’s tariffs on Mexico and Canada problem auto business

A car carrier trailer waits in line next to the border wall before crossing to the United States at Otay commercial port in Tijuana, Baja California state, Mexico, on Jan. 22, 2025.

Guillermo Arias | AFP | Getty Images

DETROIT — Tariffs announced Saturday by the Trump administration of 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico as well as an additional 10% on products from China are expected to have a profound impact on the global automotive industry.

For months, automakers have been taking a “wait-and-see” approach to the Trump administration’s tariff threat. That waiting period is coming to an end and automakers will likely need to implement prior contingency plans to attempt to offset additional costs in the coming weeks and months.

Depending on the details, the tariffs on Mexico could have the greatest impact on the automotive industry, followed by Canada and then China, depending on the automaker.

“Any tariff action must be followed with a renegotiation of the [United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement], and a full review of the corporate trade regime that has devastated the American and global working class,” Shawn Fain, president of the United Auto Workers Union, said in a statement.

Read more CNBC tariffs coverage

General Motors and other major automakers did not immediately respond for comment regarding the tariffs Saturday night. Others such as Ford declined to comment, while Honda issued a broad statement: “North American auto trade is key to the success of Honda globally and we look forward to a swift resolution that provides clarity and stability throughout the region.”

Most major automakers have factories in the U.S. However, they still rely heavily on imports from other countries including Mexico to meet American consumer demand.

Nearly every major automaker operating in the U.S. has at least one plant in Mexico, including the six top-selling automakers, which accounted for more than 70% of U.S. sales in 2024.

A tariff is a tax on imports, or foreign goods, brought into the United States. The companies importing the goods pay the tariffs, and some fear the companies would simply pass any additional costs on to consumers — raising the cost of vehicles and potentially reducing demand.

The formal announcement provides some clarity for companies but could cost automakers, many of which have produced vehicles without tariffs in Canada and Mexico for decades, billions of dollars.

Uncertainty about trade took a toll on GM on Tuesday, when the automaker’s stock had one of its worst days in years even after it beat Wall Street’s expectations for its 2025 guidance and its top- and bottom-line for the fourth quarter. 

“Our key take from GM’s 4Q [earnings] result is that while the opportunity for GM is highly compelling, US policy uncertainty must be navigated for the time being,” Barclays analyst Dan Levy said in an investor note Wednesday.

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

GM stock

GM did not account for potential tariffs in its guidance, which CFO Paul Jacobson described as a “cautious” approach given no duties on North American goods had been implemented yet.

Both Jacobson and GM CEO Mary Barra said the company has contingency plans for any actions, but that wasn’t enough to appease anxious investors.

“There’s just so much noise,” Jacobson told investors Tuesday, citing the inauguration and California wildfires, among other issues and events. “We’re being cautious until we get a little bit more smooth data from the marketplace just because January was so noisy.”

‘Massive impact’

Tariffs could have a massive effect on the global automotive industry and potentially reduce earnings for companies such as GM, which has significant manufacturing operations across North America.

“Regardless of timing, these blanket tariffs would have a massive impact on the auto industry,” S&P Global Mobility said in a report this week. “Virtually no [automaker] or supplier” operating in North America would be immune, according to the report.

Flanked by Blackstone CEO Stephen Schwarzman (L) and General Motors CEO Mary Barra (R), U.S. President Donald Trump holds a strategy and policy forum with chief executives of major U.S. companies at the White House in Washington February 3, 2017.

Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

Nearly every major automaker operating in the U.S. has at least one plant in Mexico, including the six top-selling automakers, which accounted for more than 70% of U.S. sales in 2024.

The industry is deeply integrated between the countries, with Mexico importing 49.4% of all auto parts from the U.S. In turn, Mexico exports 86.9% of its auto parts production to the U.S., according to the International Trade Administration.

Wells Fargo estimates that 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada imports would cost the traditional Detroit automaker billions of dollars a year. The firm estimates the impact of 5%, 10% and 25% tariffs on GM, Ford Motor and Chrysler parent Stellantis would collectively be $13 billion, $25 billion and $56 billion, respectively.

S&P Global Mobility, formerly IHS Markit, estimates a 25% duty on a $25,000 vehicle from Canada or Mexico would add $6,250 to its cost — some if not most of which could be passed on to the consumer.

Automakers most at risk

S&P Mobility reports plants in Canada and Mexico produce roughly 5.3 million vehicles, with about 70% — nearly 4 million — destined for the U.S.

Mexico accounted for a majority of those vehicles, as five automakers — Ford, GM, Stellantis, Toyota Motor and Honda — produced only an estimated 1.3 million light-duty vehicles in 2024 in Canada, largely for the U.S. market, according to a Canadian manufacturing nonprofit research group.

Some of those automakers also heavily rely on production in Mexico, but not all producers would face the same disruptions. On a percentage of sales basis, German automaker Volkswagen is the most exposed to tariff risk in Mexico, followed by Nissan Motor and Stellantis, S&P Global Mobility reports.

“We are working, obviously, on scenarios,” Antonio Filosa, head of Stellantis’ North American operations, said Jan. 10. “But yes, we need to await his decisions and after the decision of Mr. Trump and his administration, we will work accordingly.”

Here are the automakers that are most exposed to tariffs on vehicles imported from Mexico, based on the percentage of their U.S. sales being produced south of the border:

  • Volkswagen: 43%
  • Nissan: 27%
  • Stellantis: 23%
  • GM: 22%
  • Ford: 15%
  • Honda: 13%
  • Toyota: 8%
  • Hyundai: 8%

Jamie Raskin Blasts Trump Over FBI Purge

PoliticusUSA serves readers who want their media without billionaires and corporations. Please support us by becoming a subscriber.

The purges that are happening within federal law enforcement are not surprising. They are exactly what Donald Trump said he was going to do while campaigning for a return to the White House.

Trump’s revenge tour has so far been focused on 1/6 and those within law enforcement who investigated him, and any watchdogs within the Executive Branch who might investigate him in the future.

House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jamie Raskin didn’t hold anything back while responding to Trump’s FBI purge.

Raskin said in a statement:

In another repulsive affront to the rule of law and our nation’s law enforcement officers, the Trump Administration today moved to fire scores of FBI agents and DOJ prosecutors simply for enforcing the law and impartially carrying out the largest criminal investigation in American history which they had been assigned to work on. On Day One, the unpopular President Trump pardoned the members of violent militias and street gangs who beat police officers to a pulp with pipes, flagpoles and broken furniture when they attacked the Capitol on January 6, 2021 to overturn the presidential election Trump had lost by more than 7 million votes, 306-232 in the electoral college.

“Today, shockingly but not surprisingly, Trump takes aim at the career FBI agents and DOJ prosecutors who investigated and prosecuted the violent insurrectionary assault on our police officers to block the peaceful transfer of power, as well as those FBI agents who were assigned to investigate Trump’s efforts to illegally retain classified records at his Mar-a-Lago club, defy judicial subpoenas, obstruct justice, conceal evidence, and lie to law enforcement.

Trump’s outrageous attack on the DOJ and FBI is a clear and present danger to public safety, and a wrecking ball swinging at the rule of law.