Eli Lilly’s therapy with solanezumab didn’t decelerate the illness

Eli Lilli on Wednesday said it would halt development of its Alzheimer’s treatment candidate solanezumab after the antibody failed to slow the progression of the disease.

The failure of solanezumab is a setback to efforts to treat Alzheimer’s disease in people who are very early in the disease and have not yet presented clinical symptoms.

The study involved more than 1,000 seniors who had normal memory and thinking function but showed signs of brain plaque associated with Alzheimer’s.

Solanezumab did not clear or stop the buildup of the plaque called amyloid or slow cognitive decline in the participants who received the treatment.

“These data suggest that we may need to be more aggressive in removing amyloid even at this very early stage of the disease,” said Dr. Reisa Sperling, neurologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and leader of the study.

Solanezumab was designed to target plaque that swims in the brain. Lilly is developing two other Alzheimer’s treatments that are in late-stage clinical trials, donanemab and Remternetug. These antibodies target plaque that has built up in the brain and are designed to treat people who have early symptoms of the disease.

Join CNBC’s Healthy Returns on March 29, where we’re hosting a virtual gathering of healthcare CEOs, scientists, investors and innovators to reflect on the advances made today in reinventing the future of medicine. We also have an exclusive look at the best investment opportunities in biopharma, healthcare technology and managed care. Learn more and register today: http://bit.ly/3DUNbRo

Lilly expects to release clinical trial data for donanemab in the second quarter of this year. The company plans to ask the Food and Drug Administration to approve the treatment if those data are positive.

Lilly had asked the FDA for an accelerated approval of donanemab, but the agency denied the company’s application in January. The agency told Lilly that it must provide data from at least 100 patients who received the treatment for 12 months.

Lilly said it didn’t have that data because donanemab quickly cleared brain plaques in many patients.

“Because of the speed of plaque reduction that we observed, many patients were able to stop taking donanemab as early as six months of treatment, resulting in fewer patients receiving donanemab dosing for 12 months or more,” said Dr. Dan Skovronsky, Lilly’s chief scientific officer, told analysts during the company’s earnings call in February.

“We remain hopeful that donanemab may be a new treatment for people with early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease,” said Skovronsky.

The FDA approved Eisai’s and Biogen’s early-stage Alzheimer’s treatment Leqembi on an accelerated basis in January. The companies expect the agency to make a decision on full approval in July.

Medicare only covers Alzheimer’s antibody drugs that receive accelerated approval for people participating in clinical trials. The public health insurance program for seniors said it will offer broader coverage once the FDA grants full approval.

Ivanka Trump betrays her father and brothers in fraud case

Ivanka Trump went with the tried and true defense of when people start trying to save themselves. She blamed her father and brothers for the fraud.

The Independent reported:

In court documents, Ms. Trump’s attorneys argue that the fraud lawsuit filed against her and her co-defendants by New York Attorney General Letitia James last year “does not contain a single allegation that Ms. Trump directly or indirectly created, prepared, verified, or any of her father’s financial statements.

“Other people were responsible for these tasks,” wrote her attorneys.

Subscribe to our newsletter:

The New York Attorney General has a very different view of the case in which Ivanka Trump is just as involved in the Trump Organization fraud as the other family members.

Ivanka Trump clearly won’t be taking legal bullets for her family. Just like her father, she blamed someone else and that person is her father.

The scam Ivanka Trump may have been involved in involved paying consulting fees despite being a Trump Organization official. Donald Trump then wrote off monies paid to corporate tax adviser Ivanka.

Trump demanded loyalty from everyone around him, but even his own daughter threw him under the bus.

Jason is the managing editor. He is also a White House press pool and congressional correspondent for PoliticusUSA. Jason has a bachelor’s degree in political science. His thesis focused on public policy with a specialization in social reform movements.

Awards and professional memberships

Member of the Society of Professional Journalists and the American Political Science Association

WeightWatchers inventory surges after Sequence deal

shares of WW Internationalalso known as WeightWatchers, soared on Tuesday after the company announced it would buy Sequence, a telehealth platform used to treat obesity.

The stock closed 79% higher on Tuesday. Its market value was more than $488 million.

“As the trusted leader in weight management, it is our responsibility to support those interested in finding out if medication is right for them,” WW CEO Sima Sistani said in an announcement Monday.

Tuesday’s jump follows a year of flagging performance for the stock. The company’s shares have fallen 57% over the past year as it struggled to focus on wellness and move away from weight loss.

Sistani took over as CEO in late February and steered the company back toward weight loss.

The Sequence announcement comes as companies in the weight-loss industry seek to offer obesity drugs as a way for customers to shed pounds.

The trend has led to a shortage of drugs like Ozempic, which are commonly prescribed for type 2 diabetes.

Florida stripper arrested after throwing wad of money at ex’s head

An angry one Florida The stripper was arrested last month after allegedly throwing a “large amount of rolled up money” on a colleague’s head, according to a criminal complaint smoking gun.

Tierah Miller29, is accused of assaulting the 34-year-old man she previously dated, who also works as a security guard at the Baby Dolls strip club in Clearwater.

Stripper ‘ambushed’ co-worker/ex-boyfriend with huge wad of cash, criminal charges say

The incident is said to have happened at the club around 11:55am on February 26, just a week after the couple split, the complaint said.

Miller, who appeared sober at the time, allegedly threw a “large” wad of cash at the man after “trying to walk across the stage to speak to another colleague” and hit him in the back of the head.

As she left the club, she intentionally knocked over a stool with the victim’s cell phone, an ID scanner and a metal detector, according to the complaint.

RELATED: Portland woman creates PowerPoint presentation to reveal to her parents she’s a stripper

Her ex-boyfriend said when he found his cellphone in the parking lot, it was broken and it cost an estimated $100 to fix the screen, the complaint continues.

Stripper charged with misdemeanor, victim largely unharmed

The complaint said she was charged with trespassing.

Meanwhile, no blood was shed in the attack and the man sustained no serious injuries.

The exact amount of money thrown at the victim remains unclear, but the outlet reported that “single (dollar bills) appear to be a likely component.”

Miller was released from prison without bail and ordered to refrain from all contact with her ex, but has been allowed to continue dancing at the club where the two are employed.

She was previously convicted of reckless driving, marijuana possession and driving without a license, according to Smoking Gun.

Rivian raises $1.three billion amid considerations about EV demand

The Rivian name is seen on one of their new electric SUV vehicles in San Diego, the United States, on December 16, 2022.

Mike Blake | Reuters

Rivian Automotive plans to raise $1.3 billion in cash through the sale of convertible debentures and join a growing list of electric vehicle manufacturers scrambling to hoard cash when demand slacks.

Rivian shares closed down over 14% on Tuesday.

related investment news

CNBC Investing Club

Rivian said late Monday it plans to sell the convertible bonds — bonds that can be redeemed for cash, stock or a mix of both — to fund the development and launch of its forthcoming smaller R2 car line, now expected in 2026 . The institutional investors purchasing the Notes will have the option to purchase up to $200 million in additional Notes if they wish, in addition to the initial $1.3 billion.

Rivian isn’t in an urgent liquidity crisis, at least not yet. The EV maker had $12.1 billion on tap at the end of 2022, it said during its fourth-quarter earnings presentation on Feb. 28, enough to fund its operations through 2025. But he recently took a number of measures to save cash, laying off 6% of the workforce and pushing the R2’s launch forward by a year.

Rivian would be facing its final days if it weren't for the Saudi support, says ZoZo Go CEO

Rivian also said last week that it expects to produce 50,000 vehicles in 2023, down from the roughly 60,000 Wall Street analysts had been expecting. That could be a sign that demand for its high-priced pickups and SUVs is falling short of expectations.

ClearAnother startup that makes high-priced electric vehicles also led investors to lower-than-expected production in 2023 and said it plans to ramp up its marketing in the coming months, suggesting it may be less too orders than expected.

Rivian raised nearly $12 billion when it went public in late 2021, helping it amass a cash hoard that still dwarfs most other EV startups. However, the company’s shares have lost over 80% of their value since the debut.

Rivian said the convertible bonds would qualify as “green bonds,” meaning they meet a set of criteria that tend to attract institutions willing to accept lower yields in exchange for supporting sustainable development.

The Notes mature in March 2029. The interest rate and other terms will be determined when the offer is priced.

White Home approves Senate TikTok invoice and urges Congress to move it quickly

U.S. Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) and other U.S. senators unveil legislation that would allow the Biden administration to “ban” foreign tech products like Chinese video app TikTok during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington in March or to ban”. 7th, 2023.

Bonnie Cash | Reuters

The White House on Tuesday backed a new bipartisan Senate bill that would give the Biden administration the power to ban TikTok in the US

The legislation would empower the Department of Commerce to review deals, software updates, or data transmissions through information and communications technology in which a foreign adversary has an interest. TikTok, which has become a viral sensation in the US by allowing kids to create and share short videos, is owned by Chinese internet giant ByteDance.

Under the new proposal, if the Commerce Secretary determines a transaction poses an “unreasonable or unacceptable risk” to U.S. national security, it can be referred to the President for action, up to and including a forced divestment.

The bill was dubbed the RESTRICT Act, which stands for Restricting the Emergence of Security Threats that Risk Information and Communications Technology.

Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, formally introduced the legislation on Capitol Hill along with a bipartisan group of Senate co-sponsors. The White House issued a statement publicly endorsing the bill, while Warner briefed reporters.

“This law provides a systematic framework to address technology-based threats to the security of Americans,” said White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan said in a statement, adding that it would provide the government with new tools to mitigate national security risks in the technology sector.

Sullivan urged Congress to “act quickly to send the bill to the President’s desk.”

“Critically, it would strengthen our ability to address discrete risks created by individual transactions and systemic risks created by certain classes of transactions involving countries of concern in sensitive technology sectors,” Sullivan said.

A TikTok spokeswoman did not respond to CNBC’s request for comment on Tuesday.

Sullivan’s statement marks the first time a TikTok bill has received the Biden administration’s explicit support in Congress, and it catapulted Warner’s bill to the top of a growing list of congressional proposals to ban TikTok.

As of Tuesday, Warner’s legislation had not had a companion version in the House. But Warner told CNBC he already has “a lot of interest” from both Democrats and Republicans in the lower chamber.

Warner declined to say who he and Republican co-sponsor Sen. John Thune, RSD, might ask for assistance in the House of Representatives, but added, “I’m very pleased with the keen interest we’ve received from some of ours.” Housemates.”

Earlier this month, the House Foreign Affairs Committee passed a bill that would force the president to impose sanctions on Chinese companies that could potentially leak Americans’ private information to a foreign adversary.

But unlike Warner’s bill, the House legislation known as the DATA Act has no Democratic backers, and it has advanced out of committee along party lines, making its prospects in the Senate with a Democratic majority difficult.

Senators introducing the bill Tuesday stressed that unlike some other proposals, their legislation does not single out individual companies. Instead, it aims to create a new framework and legal process for identifying and mitigating specific threats.

“The RESTRICT Act is about more than just TikTok,” Warner told reporters. “He’s going to give us that comprehensive approach.”

The new Senate bill defines foreign adversaries as the governments of six countries: China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Venezuela and Cuba. It also says it will apply to information and communications technology services that have at least 1 million active US users per year or that have sold at least 1 million units to US customers in the past year.

That could go far beyond TikTok, which claims it had 100 million monthly active users in the US in 2020

The company came under scrutiny by the US Committee on Foreign Relations following ByteDance’s 2017 acquisition of Musical.ly, a precursor to the popular video-sharing app.

But that process has stalled, and lawmakers and administration officials are impatient to address what they see as a critical national security risk. TikTok has claimed that CFIUS approval of a new risk mitigation strategy is the best way forward.

“The Biden administration does not need additional powers from Congress to address national security concerns related to TikTok: it can approve the deal negotiated with CFIUS over two years, which it has been reviewing for the past six months,” said Brooke Oberwetter, spokeswoman for TikTok, in a statement before the text of the law was released.

“A US ban on TikTok is a ban on the export of American culture and values ​​to the more than 1 billion people who use our service worldwide,” the company said. “We hope Congress will seek solutions to their national security concerns that do not result in the voices of millions of Americans being censored.”

Will Farrell, TikTok’s interim security officer, described in a speech Monday the multi-pronged approach the company plans to take to mitigate the risk that the Chinese government could disrupt its operations in the United States

The so-called Project Texas would be involved in this oracle hosts its data in the cloud with strict procedures on how that information can be accessed and even sends verified code directly to the mobile app stores where users can find the service.

Farrell said TikTok’s commitments would result in an “unprecedented level of transparency” for such a tech company.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

WATCH: TikTok Ban Law: What you need to know

California Gov. Newsom says the state is not going to do enterprise with Walgreens

California Gov. Gavin Newsom successfully defeated a recall attempt in California last year. When asked if he was preparing to run for president, Newsom insisted he wasn’t.

Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

California Gov. Gavin Newsom said Monday the state would no longer do business with him Walgreensafter the drugstore chain told 21 Republican attorneys general it would not sell the abortion pill in its states.

Newsom said on Twitter that the state was “done” with dealings with Walgreens. Brandon Richards, a spokesman for the governor, said California is reviewing all of Walgreens’ relationships with the state.

“We will not do business with companies that give in to right-wing bullies who are pushing their extremist agenda, or companies that prioritize politics over women’s and girls’ health,” Richards said.

According to a statement, Walgreens plans to sell mifepristone “in every jurisdiction where it is legally permitted to do so.” “Once we are FDA certified, we will be distributing this drug in accordance with federal and state laws,” the company added.

The Food and Drug Administration in January allowed retail pharmacies to sell the abortion pill mifepristone if they are certified under an agency program that oversees how the drug is used and distributed.

Walgreens plans to become certified to sell mifepristone where legal under state and federal law, the company said. In February, 21 Republican attorneys general warned Walgreens not to ship mifepristone in their states.

Join us for CNBC’s Healthy Returns on March 29, where we’re hosting a virtual gathering of healthcare CEOs, scientists, investors and innovators to reflect on the advances made today in reinventing the future of medicine. We also have an exclusive look at the best investment opportunities in biopharma, healthcare technology and managed care. Learn more and register today: http://bit.ly/3DUNbRo

The company told attorneys general it would not sell or ship the pill in their states. Politico first reported the news.

Mifepristone, used in combination with another drug called misoprostol, is the most common method of abortion in the United States, accounting for about half of all abortions.

CNBC Health & Science

Read CNBC’s latest global health coverage:

Mifepristone has become a central issue in the fight for access to abortion after the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade had picked up.

A group of anti-abortion doctors have petitioned a Texas federal court to stay the FDA’s approval of mifepristone. On the other hand, Democratic attorneys general have asked a federal court in Washington to declare the FDA’s remaining restrictions on mifepristone unconstitutional.

The FDA approved mifepristone more than two decades ago, but the agency has imposed restrictions to ensure the pill’s safe use. The agency has gradually eased these restrictions over the years as more evidence of their safety and effectiveness accumulates.

The agency removed the requirement for patients to receive the pill in person at certain health facilities and allowed the drugs to be mailed. Patients still need a prescription from a healthcare provider that is FDA certified.

This operating jacket from Amazon with over 7,600 5-star critiques is now on sale

We have independently selected these offers and products because we love them and we think you might like them at these prices. E! has affiliate relationships, so we may earn a commission if you buy something through our links. Items are sold by the retailer, not E!. Prices are correct at time of publication.

Sometimes all you need to run is a good running jacket. Fortunately, we’ve found the perfect one for you, and it’s currently available on Amazon for under $50. The best part? This sports jacket has over 7,600 positive reviews and trust us when we say they will convince you to buy more than just one!

This slim fitting sports jacket ranges in size from X-Small to 4X-Large, but the sizes have already sold out because it’s comfortable, high quality, flattering and affordable. The jacket has a high collar to keep you warm while you run, performance cotton-soft fabric and thumb holes to keep your hands warm. It also comes in a ton of cute colors, but you definitely can’t go wrong with the simple black.

The reviews speak for this running jacket! One reviewer calls the jacket a “well-made, well-tailored, super-soft jacket at a great price,” while another says, “I’ve never been happier with a purchase.” I bought two of these and the quality of the material is amazing, definitely worth the price! Conforms to the body and accentuates every curve you have. They’re chunky but in an athletic way. I use them for regular outfits and workouts and it’s really more than I expected! 10/10 would recommend.”

Scroll down to shop Amazon’s running jacket while it’s on sale!

Alec Baldwin ‘Rust’ prosecutors slammed for missteps

Actor Alec Baldwin leaves his home as he faces involuntary manslaughter charges in the fatal shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of the film ‘Rust’ January 31, 2023 in New York.

David Dee Delgado | Reuters

It’s been a little over a month since New Mexico authorities charged Alec Baldwin with manslaughter for fatally shooting a crew member on the set of the film Rust, and already prosecutors have come under fire and scrutiny.

First of all, the question arises as to whether the chief prosecutor is even entitled to hear the case. The state constitution prohibits a member of one branch of government from exercising power in another branch. Andrea Reeb, the special prosecutor, also serves as the Republican legislature. Baldwin’s attorneys filed a motion on February 7 to have Reeb removed from the case.

The Reeb and New Mexico prosecutors denied that disqualification motion, calling the defense’s argument a “misunderstanding” and saying it rests “on a novel theory that has no support in the statutes or jurisprudence of New Mexico,” according to those filing Court documents Monday.

“Accepting the defendant’s theory would require the court to enact new legislation that would have nationwide implications and be based on nothing more than creative, unsupported arguments,” prosecutors wrote in the court filings.

Legal experts have also criticized Reeb for overcharging Baldwin based on a law that wasn’t in effect at the time of the fatal shooting. She relented and downgraded the charges, which could result in a shorter prison sentence for Baldwin if convicted.

Lawyers also found inflammatory press statements and media appearances by prosecutors strange, as prosecutors are usually advised to save their comments for the courtroom.

“From the beginning, there were some unusual facts surrounding the prosecution’s prosecution,” said John Day, a Santa Fe-based attorney who has practiced law in New Mexico since 1996.

The charges stem from the October 2021 shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins while filming independent film Rust. Baldwin, who also starred in The Departed and Beetlejuice, held the gun, which was loaded with live ammunition.

Baldwin, who is also a producer of Rust, and the film’s gunsmith at the time, Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, were both charged in January by New Mexico First Circuit Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies with two separate counts of involuntary manslaughter. By law, a jury can only convict her on one of those charges, each of which carries a maximum possible sentence of 18 months in prison.

David Halls, the film’s first assistant director, signed an agreement to plead charges of negligent use of a deadly weapon and receive a suspended sentence and six months’ probation.

Baldwin and Gutierrez-Reed are scheduled to appear virtually for a status hearing on Thursday.

The Special Prosecutor

Carmack-Altwies appointed Reeb as a special prosecutor in August. Reeb was previously the ninth Judicial District Attorney, but retired a year ago shortly after she launched her legislative campaign. She won the race in November but stayed with the “Rust” case.

Reeb’s dual roles as legislator and prosecutor caused a stir in the local legal community. George Heidke, a former attorney with the First Judicial District Attorney’s Office, told CNBC it was the first time in his 25 years as a New Mexico attorney that he had seen a sitting legislature double as a prosecutor.

Baldwin’s attorneys argue that Reeb should be removed from the case. “A prosecutor who also serves as a legislature could be pressured to make prosecutorial decisions that serve her legislative interests,” Baldwin’s attorneys wrote in a filing. Baldwin is an outspoken supporter of Democratic and progressive issues, making him a target for Reeb’s Republican peers.

The prosecutor’s office responded to that argument on Monday, saying such claims “are purely hypothetical and show which limb the defendant must step on to allege some sort of ‘interference or interference’.”

There are other complications too.

An aerial view of the film set at Bonanza Creek Ranch where Hollywood actor Alec Baldwin fatally shot cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and injured a director while firing a prop cannon on the film set of the film ‘Rust’ in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA. in this frame from the October 21, 2021 television footage. The footage was captured on October 21, 2021.

KOB TV NEWS | Reuters

“I think everyone can agree that she’s unduly placed in two different branches of government at once,” Lisa Torraco, the New Mexico attorney representing Halls, told CNBC. “There’s a good reason for that: I’m donating to her campaign as a legislator, and now she’s the special prosecutor on my case.”

In September, Torraco donated $250 to Reeb’s campaign, believing that if Reeb won the legislature race, she would automatically withdraw from the Rust case. That didn’t happen.

“If I had known that, I probably wouldn’t have given her any money,” Torraco said.

In addition to Torraco, Carmack-Altwies, a registered Democrat, and Dennis Maez, the Halls private investigator, also contributed to Reeb’s campaign.

Torraco said there was no connection between her small campaign donation and Halls’ pleading. But according to Santa Fe attorney Day, “Looks matter.”

“When you donate money to legislators, you have to understand that people will have access to it and they’re going to be like, ‘What’s going on?'” he said. “That’s exactly why you don’t want a legislature who also doubles as a prosecutor.”

Heather Brewer, the prosecutor’s spokeswoman specially hired for the Rust case, confirmed Torraco’s donation. She added that Reeb’s “integrity could never be compromised by a $250 donation β€” or a donation of any size.

Gutierrez-Reed’s attorneys co-signed Baldwin’s motion to disqualify Reeb. The prosecutor’s office declined to comment on the application before submitting its response.

“A mistake in the first year of law school”

Aside from Reeb’s role in the legislature, local attorneys found it odd that Carmack-Altwies should even appoint a special prosecutor. In the past, when prosecutors did not have the resources to handle a case, they would turn to the Attorney General for help.

Instead, Carmack-Altwies demanded $635,000 from the New Mexico Treasury Committee and claimed that her office needed an additional attorney, a media liaison and other personnel to deal specifically with the “Rust” case, one said Writing that you on 13 30.

When asked by a member of the CFO if she had contacted the attorney general, Carmack-Altwies said she had not “specifically addressed this case,” according to the transcript of a hearing regarding her funding request. Reeb is the better option, Carmack-Altwies said, because she has “over 25 years of experience and this will be her only case for the next 12 to 18 months, which is intended.”

The state awarded the Attorney’s Office $317,750, about half of the original request.

Torraco said the charges Baldwin and Gutierrez-Reed face are among the lowest-level crimes in New Mexico.

“And they’re asking the Legislature for hundreds of thousands of dollars to prosecute them? It’s just absurd,” Torraco said. “They track fourth-degree crimes every day…why all the hype?”

The legal risk Baldwin faced was much higher until last month, when his attorneys challenged another prosecutor’s decision.

When Reeb first filed criminal charges, she included a so-called firearms enhancement lawsuit, which carries a possible five-year prison sentence. Baldwin’s attorneys filed a motion on February 10 to remove this amendment because it became law seven months after the fatal shooting and violated the legal concept known as “ex post facto.”

It was a “first-year law school mistake,” Day said. “As a prosecutor, it’s your duty to make sure you’re prosecuting the right law. And it’s embarrassing when that happens because it shows they don’t pay attention to details.”

Reeb reminded Baldwin’s attorneys of their legislative obligations in a Feb. 12 email after they objected to the amendment. She’s been “busy in session all week,” she wrote, and is now only able to take a closer look at the specifics of the weapons expansion.

Reeb soon after admitted that she misapplied the correction and dropped it from the case.

Media circus

The case has received significant media attention, which has continued due to press communications from Baldwin and the prosecution. Baldwin gave an interview to ABC’s George Stephanopoulos in December 2021. Carmack-Altwies and Reeb have both appeared on CNN and Fox News.

In addition, Brewer, the spokesperson specifically hired for the Rust case, has made several heated statements about Baldwin and his attorneys on behalf of the prosecution.

Camerawoman Halyna Hutchins can be seen in this undated handout photo obtained by Reuters on October 23, 2021.

Nursing Studios | via Reuters

Following the Feb. 10 motion to reduce firearms enhancements, Brewer told CNBC that the prosecutor’s office was intent on holding anyone, “even celebrities with outlandish attorneys,” accountable under the law. Almost two weeks later, when Reeb dropped the amendment, Brewer said in a statement that the charges were dropped “to avoid further contentious distractions by Mr. Baldwin and his attorneys.”

“The priority of the prosecution is to ensure justice, not to ensure billable hours for metropolitan attorneys,” Brewer added.

Brewer has also implied that Baldwin’s attempts to remove Reeb from the case are aimed at diverting focus from Baldwin’s alleged criminal conduct. “Mr. Baldwin and his attorneys can use any tactics they wish to distract from the fact that Halyna Hutchins died on the ‘Rust’ film set as a result of gross negligence and a reckless disregard for safety,” Brewer said in a public statement.

The American Bar Association advises attorneys against making public statements that could harm a jury in a criminal trial, especially when it involves the “character” or “reputation” of the defendant.

“Prosecutors have to walk a very fine line between what they can say publicly,” said Day, the local attorney. “You don’t want to be accused up front of poisoning the jury pool. And that could certainly be an issue here.”

Rachel Maddow dismantles Georgia GOP for making an attempt to avoid wasting Trump

Rachel Maddow showed Georgia Republicans are willing to destroy democracy to save themselves and Trump from prosecution.

Video:

Maddo says:

And I don’t know, maybe that would be easier to see if it happened in another country. And you know, maybe the leader of your party is still going to be charged in other jurisdictions where he’s under investigation, like the federal level, or in upstate New York where he’s under investigation. Maybe he will, maybe he won’t. None of us know. But in the one place where he’s being criminally investigated and his party has full control of the state government, they’ve just decided, for the first time in the state’s history, that it’s in their own power to remove prosecutors from the country say of their own accord in the midst of their duties. And yes, this is a story about Georgia, and yes, this is a story about Trump and the potential charges he faces. But this is a whole new step for us as a country. This is new for us as a democracy.

This is not baiting the investigators. We’ve seen that before. And berate people and even single out individuals in the law enforcement system to try and make enemies of them. As bad as that is, we’ve seen it all before. This not only delegitimizes the entities verbally and politically. These are bad things to do.

But this is more.

stick and stone, right? But doing so will dismantle the workings of the legal system so that it will no longer work against him. This is not a resolution denouncing a prosecutor who could bring charges against Donald Trump. That gives the Republicans, that’s the Republicans voting to give themselves the power to unseat a prosecutor who’s acting in ways they don’t like because they’re on the brink of possibly filing charges against him. This passed the Georgia state legislature tonight and will soon be on its way to the governor. For Georgia yes, but for us as a country this is a milestone.

Subscribe to our newsletter:

Republicans are ready to destroy Georgia democracy to save Trump and their own skins. The idea that Georgia Republicans will give themselves the power to unseat prosecutors who are elected officials if they do something Republicans don’t like.

Maddow was right. What Georgia Republicans are trying to do is a threat to democracy. Georgia GOP would rather destroy democracy than see Trump indicted/

Jason is the managing editor. He is also a White House press pool and congressional correspondent for PoliticusUSA. Jason has a bachelor’s degree in political science. His thesis focused on public policy with a specialization in social reform movements.

Awards and professional memberships

Member of the Society of Professional Journalists and the American Political Science Association